Another Godhra in the Making?

I am beginning to worry about India’s national security in the wake of the Pakistani…

I am beginning to worry about India’s national security in the wake of the Pakistani terrorist attacks on Gurdaspur and Udhampur as well as rumbles about cyber security, and the Taliban advance on Kunduz.

Gurdaspur terror attack

I hark back to NDA1 and the concentrated efforts then to defeat the government; if anything, the malign conjunction of forces looking to hamstring PM Narendra Modi is stronger, which suggests even worse things are being planned.

The first concern is Pakistani intent, as bolstered by Chinese and possibly Western advice. The second is the role of the compromised Opposition and fifth columnists.

As far as Pakistan is concerned, the first taste of the Modi Administration was salutary. They started off with their usual tactic of heavy unprovoked shelling across the International Border and the Line of Control. Much to their surprise, the return of fire was withering, and three times as heavy, and so they quickly ran up the white flag after casualties mounted.

Lesson 1: the Pakistani Army understands pain when applied directly to their bottoms.

Lesson 2: in conventional warfare, India has a big edge, hence Pakistan needs to revert to Plan B: terrorism.

Then we had the Yakub Memon hanging, which, Pakistanis have been told by their friends in the Indian mainstream media, has deeply divided society. Moreover,Memon was an innocent Muslim whom “they” (as in the provocative Indian Express headline) “killed”. Pakistanis may calculate that this ‘atrocity’ will be a good excuse for them to attack India, with support from the usual quarters.

Thus acts of terrorism using ‘sleeper’ infiltrators whom they had already introduced into India. The goal is to goad India into escalation and retaliation. But as many commentators have pointed out, India’s response does not have to be binary: appeasement (Manmohan style) or war (Modi’s presumed style).

There are a few more nuancedresponses: economic, diplomatic, cultural, and special operations. (The latest comment by the MEA is salutary: they unambiguously pointed out that Pakistan suffers from terrorism only because it is the fount of terrorism.)

Economic approaches could be based on cutting off trade or at least reducing trade. However, sanctions have limited bite since trade is already quite low, as Pakistan refuses to follow their obligations under WTO to provide Most-Favored-Nation status for low-tariff imports from India. India really doesn’t have a great deal of clout on this front. Far more discomforting to them would be a suspension of, and demand for renegotiation of, the Indus Water Treaty, which is heavily biased in Pakistan’s favor.

As for diplomatic isolation, a Commonwealth get-together was boycotted by India (but only because Pakistan refused to invite somebody from J&K). Now that is a pinprick (and incidentally, I have long argued that India should exit the British Commonwealth anyway, as it needs India more than vice versa). Who cares? It doesn’t hurt anybody.

What would hurt is a diplomatic freeze, and cancellation of the PM’s projected trip to Pakistan. I have no idea why India agreed to this in the first place, because it doesn’t serve India’s interests. It serves Pakistan’s interests to be seen as a normal country that India needs to engage.

On the contrary, the PM ignoring Pakistan so far in his ‘concentric circles’ of foreign policy (Subcontinent and Southern Asia, Indian Ocean Rim, East Asia, Europe, Americas) has caused India little to no harm, but it has incensed Pakistan.

As for cultural issues, several Leftie pundits have been arguing about ‘Track 2’, ‘people-to-people’, links, including cricket. Why on earth?

If Pakistanis are allowed to play cricket with India, that leads to transfer of Indian money to Pakistan, which will be recycled to fund more terror. With apologies to Yossarian in Catch-22, who needs the intermediary? Just give the cricket funds directly to the terrorists!) Better to treat them as pariahs: remember how it hurt rogue, apartheid South Africa to be excluded from sports?

Finally, there are Special Operations, i.e. covert operations in Pakistan. I think the time has come to ratchet these up. IK Gujral, in a fit of desperate idiocy, betrayed all the human intelligence resources (that is, spies) that India had infiltrated into Pakistan: it remains to be seen if Ajit Doval has been able to reintroduce Indian spies there. I am assuming he has (there’s nothing as good as spies on the ground).

One set of covert operations would be to smuggle in weapons and propaganda. Thus, the colonized and oppressed people of Balochistan and Gilgit-Baltistan, none too thrilled about Punjabi Pakistani tyranny, could be supplied with army movement intelligence, logistics support, satellite photography, internet-based intelligence, weapons (preferably discreetly marked ‘Made in China’), counterfeit money (preferably with clues leading to China), real money, satellite phones and bomb-making know how.

Just to add to the general mayhem, it would be nice to do the same for Uighurs in Chinese-Occupied Xinjiang (COX) and Tibetans in Chinese-Occupied Tibet (COT) – the weapons and money should be recognizably ‘Made in Pakistan’.

Bhedam¸ or creating dissent among the enemy, pays rich dividends.If possible, the same can be done for the Pakistani Taliban, elements of whom are hostile to the ISI and the Pakistani Army. They are massacring Pakistanis anyway, and they’ll be happy to do more.

But a more subtle tactic would be to take into account the maxim that your enemy must feel serious, disproportionate, pain for hurting you. Thus, it would be a good idea to target the current and retired top brass of the ISI and Pak Army. A few judiciously-staged and unfortunate car accidents, house fires, plane crashes, etc have deniability. Of course, Zia’s crate of mangoes and Benazir’s Toyota show that Pakistanis know these tactics, but two can play that game.

The point is that there should be deep, individual pain imposed on decision makers. It is not possible for them to be invulnerable 24×7. Maybe they are safe in cantonments (yes, they were able to keep Osama there), but they do have to leave now and then; they do retire, they do travel abroad, and they have family outside the Army areas, and even abroad. One or two ‘accidents’ after each terrorist strike would get the message across. And these can’t be pinned on India if done discreetly. Plausible deniability.

Second, the role of the Opposition. I still remember a communist woman leader instigating and provoking the families of the hostages on the hijacked AI 814, which led to the ignominious surrender and the release of several important terrorists (by, the way, why not inject released terrorists in future with some horrible disease? I heard a poor, wretched, infected 15-year old Yazidi sex slave has spread AIDS among a lot of ISIS fighters, which gives me the idea).

I have no doubt that today’s opposition Congress and others would not hesitate to hurt India’s national interests in every way possible just to hurt the PM. This goes double for the mainstream media.

In this context, I’d like to revisit the situation in 2001 and 2002 under the NDA. After the Parliament attack – which of course aroused the self-preservation instincts of all politicians – India had begun to amass troops on the Pakistani border under Operation Parakram, and an Indian invasion looked imminent. If you remember, that’s when the Sabarmati Express was burned, in February 2002, and the entire context changed. Several divisions were moved back from the frontlines, and India’s capacity to attack was degraded and then neutralized.

Thus, Pakistan was saved by Godhra, as Anil Athale pointed out on Rediff at the time.

But Athale did not know then what had happened in the US just before, among Indian Leftists there. The chatter among them was that something was going to happen which would change the situation in India: of course they were quite worried that India would attack Pakistan. They did not know exactly what was going to happen, but they were gleefully getting prepared for that something. Clearly, they had been informed either by their Chinese handlers or by the ISI types of Fai-gate fame. Of course, we now know that that something was: Godhra.

I’m afraid we are going to see another Godhra again soon. I anticipate there will be some strong reaction the Pak pinpricks from India, perhaps some ‘accidents’ as above. I suspect the recent, unprecedented demonstrations in Gilgit-Baltistan against Pak rule was helped along by India. Soon, Pakistanis will activate their sleeper cells in India, and induce mass riots. Undoubtedly, they will attack something emotive to Indians, causing a Godhra-train-burning-like chain reaction. And that means for the next few years India will be distracted from development, forced into endless mea culpas by the Deep State-media nexus.

And the Lefties are getting active again. I am not sure what Indian Lefties in the US are doing (although they pre-emptively formed a group at Berkeley to study ‘armed conflict’ in India just before the 2014 elections (Hat tip to Narayanan for telling me about it). I wrote elsewhere I found it distinctly odd: they must be looking to incite armed conflict, not study it. Sherlock Holmes’ dog that didn’t bark in the night-time comes to mind.

Now, Kerala, one of the last bastions of the Lefties, is getting rather strange visits from them. A month ago, a journo, kicked out of his editor job, and known for chumminess with the Chinese, arrived in Trivandrum to deliver a banal lecture. The following week, a female activist, loudly and aggressively anti-BJP, arrived in Trivandrum to deliver another excruciating lecture. Then an OBC crypto-convert masquerading as a conscience-keeper of SCs showed up, too.

Coincidence? I wonder. I suspect they bore good tidings from their handlers: anticipate that something big will happen soon, and be prepared for it. I suspect we’ll see a Godhra 2.0 in Kerala. After all, elections are coming up, the commies may have to take a last stand here, and there are private militias in Kerala. The commies are losing control over their votebank of Ezhavas, who are wising up and moving closer to the BJP. This whole prospect is scaring the daylights out of me.

So it’s déjà vu all over again, as the late lamented Yogi Berra would have said.

Rajeev Srinivasan is a writer and well-known columnist from India.
  • NK Sarma

    Godhra cannot be repeated in Kerala, as kerala hindus are not like gujaratis. In fact, the marad massacre in 2003, which was no trivial in terms of brutality, failed to create even half of the impact that Sabarmati express massacre did. Moreover, you can’t have Godhra with 20% hindus anyway (not including atheists and communists).

  • gubradi Jo

    Muslims were given a separate nation because it was conclusively proved that they cant live with Hindus. Muslims are in conflict everywhere they have a critical mass. Why we get so mired in our domestic incidents that we cant understand these two timeless trends is really beyond me. And of course there is the added pressure of a massive population in a dirt poor country, which means people will make groups and fight for dominance.

    None of this confrontations are new. But with each incident people react with horror as if reacting with horror will ensure it will never happen again. But something else happens and the last one is forgotten. Same with terror incidents. Reacting with horror ensures people treat each incident as an aberration rather than a regular trend, and maybe keep enjoying the entertainment that feelings of ‘outrage’ and ‘sympathy for the victims’ provides. If we just accept that these confrontations have always been there and always be there, we can sit down and decided how we can live separately and peacefully instead of trying for the elusive ‘communal harmony’. But the way this is turned into an non-stop pornography, I have little hope

  • Rici

    Danger called pakistan is nothing in front of danger posed by so called liberal left/pressitude media. This danger need to be tacked aggressively and urgently.

  • Awaken Rogue

    Nicely written, we need more of these people in our main stream media so that we can have an unbiased opinion

  • ramjiyahoo


  • Subramaniam Narasimhan

    Respected Sir/Madam,

    A good article expressing certain possibilities based on the past events and logic. It also points to how the leftists shall resort to anything to have their way — defeat of Mr. Modi as a leader, the PM of the Government and finally Mr. Modi as a person and place the defeat and the ensuing failure on the doorsteps of all the Nationalists Hindus.

    However, resorting to anything illegal or amoral is not the exclusive preserve of the leftists alone. What about their alter-ego, and their
    none-too-strange-bedfellows, the congress party? One should be wary of
    them too, as their tentacles can be seen everywhere.

    Since the days of the none-too-successful BJS, every leftist and every liberal always supported the congress party and vice-versa. Their political, ideological and working collaboration was so congruent that they became indistinguishable from one another.

    By 1957, all the Nationalist voices in the congress party had been muzzled or muted altogether. Only Stalinism and Maoism have remained since then. By 1969, the rout of Nationalism was total and complete.

    The perversion of secularism orchestrated by the congress party over the years always had full support of leftists and liberals; the entire NAC comprised of left-liberals; the Kashmir interlocutors appointed by the NAC were leftists; it was their idea to make dhimmies and non-citizens out of majority Hindus that almost became law — Prevention of Communal and Targeted Violence (Access to Justice and Reparations) Bill.

    If securing votes and staying on the chair had been the sole aim of the congress party, they would not have resorted to piloting such an obviously communal, exceptionally unconstitutional and patently illegal Bill! They were more than willing to sacrifice the votes of the majority Hindus to appease the minorities and the left-liberals. Something more than sinister had been at work.

    If a Godhra II is being planned by the leftists and liberals with the help of internal and external resources, connivance and abetment of such seditious acts, if not, active participation in the same by their doppelgänger cannot be ruled out.

    The author has emphasized this more than clearly. Thanks for kindling the
    thoughts of those that can be kindled.

  • jadumandir

    I fully agree with the writer vis-a-vis the Godhra incident repeat. However, my thinking on the reason for this is different to the writers. I see no Paki involvement in this. It will be caused because of the way media is portraying Hindus with the help of the opposition parties and theircrooked MPs – and Hindus will take only so much. This time, it will be worse than Godhra and whether justified or not, it can only hurt India. BJP HAVE TO WAKE UP and take very strong actions against these presstitutes and opposition MPs with very strong and conviction speakers on TV debates – call a spade a spade. The country at large is with BJP and Mr Modi.

  • Wizard.

    leftists = liberals = Terrorists.

    • daibon Ten

      They are not liberals.. Hinduism is liberalism… these anti Hindu leftists are illiberal leftists

      • Wizard.

        agree forgot to put the prefix “so called “.

  • Sumathi Megavarnam

    The point of infecting Horrible diseases to terrorists is something that’s worth its weight in gold……the terrorists must undergo a painful death for their coward & dastardly acts of killing innocents…….

    • gubradi Jo

      I had thought of this technique at the time the terrorists were released, but thought maybe there is something I am missing which is preventing the wise men from doing it

    • NK Sarma

      ya, next time when pakis release 100s of indian fishermen, they would inject those kafirs with diseases. Not definitely worth its weight in gold to me.

  • pradeep

    Superbly written, hats off to the author who bluntly advised the future plan..