When God incarnated as Man-Lion

One of the unique elements of Hinduism aka Sanatana Dharma is the concept of Avatara (incarnation).

namaste narasiṁhāya,


hiraṇyakaśipor vakṣaḥ,

śilā-ṭaṅka nakhālaye

Translation: I salute to Lord Narasiṁha, who gives joy to Prahlada and whose nails are like chisels on the stone like chest of the demon Hiraṇyakaśipu

NarasimhaOne of the unique elements of Hinduism aka Sanatana Dharma is the concept of Avatara (incarnation). Hindus believe that God, which is called as Brahman, is not only transcendental in nature, it is also immanent.  More importantly, Brahman assumes various forms and takes Avatara for the sake of devotees and Dharma. This taking of Avatara from time to time, makes it possible for people to establish a direct connection, an intimate relationship with the Lord.

Among all the innumerable incarnations that Brahman assumes, the Avatara of Narasimha is unique not only because the deity has a unique form- half lion, half man, but also because the entire account of the incarnation imparts many important lessons about Vedanta, Bhakti, and Dharma. Detailed accounts of Narasimha Avatara are present in various Puranas- Bhagavata, Agni, Matya, etc., Valmiki Ramayana, Harivamsa, and briefly in Mahabharata as well.

According to these accounts in Puranas, Demon king Hiranyakashipu, overcome by his pride, wanted to teach a lesson to his son Prahlada, who had refused to obey him and had instead worshipped Lord Vishnu. When Prahlada told his father that God is the supreme controller and is present everywhere, Hiranyakashipu gets angry and asks whether God is present in the pillar. When Prahlada replies in affirmative, Hiranyakashipu strikes the pillar. From inside the pillar, Lord Narasimha emerges and takes Hiranyakashipu on his lap and cuts open his stomach using his finger nails and thus kills Hiranyakashipu.

The Puranas are by definition accounts of the past- that includes, human history, cosmology, genealogy, cosmic cycles, metaphysical accounts, philosophy, etc. The purpose of the Purana is not only to serve as a document for human history and genealogies, but also to impart important life lessons about Dharma, Jnana, Bhakti, and Moksha through various stories and accounts- both historical and metaphysical- that would help the reader/listener to attain Spiritual emancipation. Thus, even in the account of Narasimha Avatara, one can find various important lessons incorporated within them.

One of the most important lessons that the incarnation of Narasimha teaches is the fact that Brahman or God is not only transcendent, but is also immanent. In fact, Brahman exists as the Atman-innermost Self of all objects- living and non-living and all these objects derive their very existence and strength from Brahman. Thus, Prahlada says to Hiranyakashipu:

My dear King, the source of my strength, of which you are asking, is also the source of yours. Indeed, the original source of all kinds of strength is one. He is not only your strength or mine, but the only strength for everyone. Without Him, no one can get any strength. Whether moving or not moving, superior or inferior, everyone, including Lord Brahmā, is controlled by the strength that One (Brahman)” [1]. This statement is a direct reflection of the Upanishadic statement [2]: “Lord exists here everywhere in all the objects of this Universe”. The same is reiterated by Lord Krishna (Gita 15.15), when he says he exists in the heart (Hrdaya) of all beings.

Prahlada continues and says that Brahman is Ishwara- the Supreme controller of the Universe, and He using his own power manifests, maintains, and annihilates this universe [3]. This statement again is the reflection of how the Upanishads describe Brahman [4]. Thus, contrary to the popular assumption (rooted in Abrahamic notion) that God or creator is separate from his creation, Hinduism puts forward the concept of Brahman being the only reality and hence is both transcendent and immanent. Further, Brahman manifests, sustains, and absorbs back the Universe within himself.

The account of Prahlada powerfully imprints these concepts into the minds through its description of how Lord Narasimha emerged from a mere Pillar- which is a non-living entity. People, similar to Hiranyakashipu, imagine that the material world is the ultimate reality and they reject any notion of God as being the ultimate all-pervading reality. They, in their arrogance, ask, where is God? If God indeed exist why cannot I see him? Does God exist in this object, in that animal? Etc. The story powerfully brings forth the fact that God indeed pervades everything and is the source of strength of all life. In fact, the Puranic account [5] itself says that Narasimha emerged out of the pillar to prove as true the assertion of Prahlada that God inhabits everywhere. In other words, the very purpose of the incarnation of Narasimha was to demonstrate that He (Brahman) is the all-pervading Reality.

The only reason that most people, just like Hiranyakashipu, fail to perceive this all-pervading Reality is because they are too ensnared by ego and the six internal passions- lust, anger, greed, illusion, pride, and jealousy- and as a result of this, they fail to develop Bhakti that is essential for perceiving and realizing God. This is reiterated in Prahlada’s address to his father: “My dear father, please give up your demoniac mentality. Do not discriminate in your heart between enemies and friends; make your mind equipoised toward everyone. Except for the uncontrolled and misguided mind, there is no enemy within this world. When one sees everyone on the platform of equality, one then comes to the position of worshiping the Lord perfectly.”

Thus, if people today fail to perceive the presence of God, it is because of their own attachment to material pleasures. On the other hand, if one were to give up material desire and develop devotion towards Brahman, then one will not only perceive Brahman as a deity, but will also realize Brahman as one own innermost Self- one’s true nature. It is for this reason that Adi Shankara in his Vivekachoodamani (Verse 31) says that for attaining Moksha, Bhakti is the highest tool available.

Hiranyakashipu, therefore, serves as a good representation of most people who are attached to material desires and spend their lives in pursuit of sex, wealth, and power, without a care for Dharma. Prahlada, on the other hand, is a personification of Dharmic life- a life full of truth and righteousness, knowledge and devotion.

Another important lesson from the account is how God protects his devotees. When in trouble, people usually go to their family or friends. But, often these people are able to help only to a limited extent. But, the account shows that, Brahman, who is the source of all power, is infinitely powerful and at the same time, he is infinitely compassionate as well. Brahman himself incarnated as Narasimha to protect Prahlada, who was innocent and righteous and who took refuge in Brahman. Thus, the account is trying to show the fact that Brahman alone is the true refuge of the world and He always protects the righteous and the innocent. And hence, people should practice devotion and take refuge in the Lord, so that one may travel in the path of Dharma and attain overall well-being.

The account of Narasimha is particularly interesting because it serves as an example of what the scriptures term as ‘Viparita Bhakti’ (reverse devotion). Though, Hiranyakashipu considered himself as the Lord of the Universe and refused to acknowledge or recognize Lord Vishnu or anyone else as being higher than him. Hiranyakashipu hated Lord Vishnu so much that his hatred consumed his whole being. His thoughts, his words, and all his actions were directed towards Lord Vishnu. And in this sense, and very much inadvertently, he dedicated his body, mind, and speech to Lord Vishnu. This dedication of Hiranyakashipu was so intense that Lord Vishnu himself was forced to incarnate and grant him freedom from mortal existence. Thus, Lord Narasimha incarnated not only for protecting Prahlada and destroying Adharma, but also for granting freedom to Hiranyakashipu, who had worshipped the Lord through his intense hatred. This is a unique concept, which is not found anywhere except in Hinduism. This is a recognition of the power of Bhakti, which even when done in a reverse way, will bear its result.

Then, the very manner in which Hiranyakashipu was killed is also very illustrative. Lord Narasimha cut open his stomach and killed Hiranyakashipu. The stomach is the seat of Manipura Chakra and the entire story symbolically represents how the worship of this particular form of Brahman i.e. Lord Narasimha will facilitate the attainment of Moksha by making the Kundalini rise instantaneously from Manipura Chakra to Sahasrara.

VishnuThus, the incarnation of Lord Narasimha is very unique and imparts very insightful lessons. The most important lesson being- Brahman pervades the whole Universe and He is the last and only true refuge for everyone. People should imbibe these lessons into their minds and inculcate righteousness and devotion in their daily life, so that they can attain overall wellbeing.

Samsaara Saagara Nimajjana Muhyamaanam Diinam Vilokaya Vibho Karunaanidhe Maam, Prahlaada Kheda Parihaara Paraavataara Lakshmi Nrsimha Mama Dehi Karavalambam

Oh Great God Lakshmi Nrsimha, I am drowned in the ocean of day to day life, Please protect this poor one, oh, Lord, Oh treasure of compassion, Just as you took a form to remove the sorrows of Prahlada, and so, Please give me the protection of your hands. – Sri Lakshmi Narasimha Karavalamba Stotram by Sri Adi Sankaracharya


  1. Bhagavata Purana 7.8.7
  2. Isha Upanishad Verse 1
  3. Bhagavata Purana 7.8.8
  4. Taittiriya Upanishad 3.1
  5. Bhagavata Purana 7.8.17

Disclaimer: The facts and opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. IndiaFacts does not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information in this article.

With a degree in civil engineering, and having worked in construction field, Nithin Sridhar passionately writes about various issues from development, politics, and social issues, to religion, spirituality and ecology. He is based in Mysore, India. His latest book “Musings On Hinduism” provides an overview of various aspects of Hindu philosophy and society. Tweets at @nkgrock

    What deeply frustrates, annoys and disgusts me is the condition of Bhagvan Narsingh’s Murti at Hampi… It is a shame on the current Central Government for having taken NOT EVEN ONE STEP to restore Hampi Kshetra to Its Original Glory of times of Bhagvan Vidyaranya, Bhagvan Madhva, Bhagvan Vyas Tirtha, Bhagvan Vedant Desika…


    I have become Your devotee… Today only got Your Masterpiece “Musings on Hinduism”…

  • dr bulusu prasad

    what i see in the photograph of nitin s’ridhr is a young lad of less than 30 — but , to my astonishment and immense pleasure , what i read in the article is such a devout Hindu , such a mature bhakta who wrote this article not just out of his bookish knowledge but out of intense understanding , devotion and practice of Dharma — may Lord Nr.simha ever take care of this ardent devotee !

    the article is really really good — as if i am reading the original puranic account with bhashya by an acharya !

    just one more ( not very important ) detail :
    the Lord keeps intact all the boons the asura had :
    he can be killed neither by man nor by an animal ( the Avatar is neither )
    neither during the day nor during the night ( Lord killed him during twilight )
    neither inside a building nor outside it ( killed at the door , neither inside nor outside )
    neither on the earth nor in the sky ( killed by keeping him on the lap )
    neither by weapons nor by astras , neither by the living nor by the non-living ( killed with nails )

    and a little correction :
    the proper nouns Brahma and Atma end with the short vowel ‘a’
    they are ” ‘a’ kaaraanta napumsaka linga ” words ;
    in the first case ( prathamaa vibhakti ) , when you mention the name to someone , they don’t end with ‘n’ ;
    ( of course , when you address these entities ( sambodhana prathamaa vibhakti ) they become :
    hey Brahman ! , hey Atman ! )
    so , the proper forms would be ‘Brahma’ and ‘Atma’ ( begins with long ‘a’ and ends with short ‘a’ )

    thank you indiafacts , for the excellent article !

    • Nithin Sridhar

      Thank you Dr Prasad for your comments. Much humbled.

  • Anil Kumar Tandale

    Nara-Simha literally means human becoming ferocious as lions. Compared with modern times, Hiranya was apaprently a tyrant, and every citizen subject was sufferer. The seething anger was so much that each person in the populace became ferocious and waiting for a chance to pounce upon him. The legendary story says that Hiranya asked Prahlad whether God was even in the pillars of the palace, the answer was affirmative. When Hiranya hit the pillar with mace, the people in the vicinity must have pounced upon him and lynched him. The description in Puranas is figurative. Lord Krishna also promised humanity to be reborn to preserve righteousness. It seems the Lord manifested Himself in 1977 and prevented India from becoming vassal state of communism, and now also in 2014.

  • guest

    is it possible that manicure chakra also deals with ego?

  • Ramaswamy Lakshmanan

    Thanks for the article.

    Virodha Bhakti or Vipareeta Bhakti is a concept that can be understood from the lives of Hiranyakashipu or Ravana or Kamsa. But in order to gain Moksha in this form you must have the calibre of these Asuras or Rakshashaas. Your hatred has to be that intense & powerful. We have now amidst us spineless atheists and other specimens whose tapasya is not even a speck in front of these legends. Hence it is not a practical way for any one to develop Bhakti.

    Bhagavad Gita Ch 4 verses 7 & 8 (yada yada hi dharmasya……. & paritraanaaya saadhoonaam…..) capture the quintessential cause & purpose of Avatara magnificently.


    • Rajalakshmi J

      The DhvaraPalakas are extremely devoted to Lord MahaVishnu. Owing to a curse they are ordained by The Lord to quit His Abode & take birth in Planet Earth. They are heartbroken & so beseech The Lord to suggest something so that their return to to Lord’s Abode gets expedited.

      Subsequently The Lord says if born as Asuras they can return sooner.

      Please do not insult them by calling them atheists & comparing them with atheists of India. These Asuras are very zealous Thapasvis. It is The Lord who decides their fate too. These Asuras in their Three Incarnations are full of non stop contemplation of The Lord in a different way – for want of a better word I am constrained to call it ‘negative’.

      For instance Ravanan is a devout Devotee of Lord Ssiva. Vaidehi is actually Lord Ssiva in Female form & Lord Ramar is His Consort Parvathi Devi in Male form. ” Gopthri , Govindha Rupini ” ( Lalitha Sahasranamam). That is the reason unwittingly Ravanan is obsessed with Seetha Dhevi & abducts Her.

    • Rajalakshmi J

      There is another very interesting story that proves the infinite unfathomable compassion of The Lord.

      Sri.Padhmapadhar one of the Disciples of Sri.Aadhi Ssankarar is an Upasakar of Narasimha Svamy. Once he retires to a forest engaging in penance to get a darshan of The Lord. A guileless Hunter who has been living in that forest for many years is curious to know who Padhmapadhar is seeking . So offers his help in capturing whoever / whatever he is after. Padhmapadhar casually describes the Form as being part lion & part human. The hunter having promised his assistance takes it very seriously & goes around searching for such a form of Being resolving to end his very life should he fail in his mission. The Lord is overwhelmed with kindness for the simplicity of that guileless hunter & hence appears before him. The hunter does not KNOW it is The Lord. As Padhmapadhar did not tell him it is The Lord’s form. He assumed the hunter being unlettered would not understand.

      The hunter ties up Narasimha Svamy bringing Him before Padhmapadhar before sunset. But The Lord remains visible ONLY to the Hunter & invisible to Padhmapadhar. Only when the Hunter starts describing the skeptic in Padhmapadhar understands & is in tears.

  • Rama

    Demonic king is so Abramic. Asura king is appropriate. No equivalent terms in English