Nothing to celebrate about Periyar

Today is the 135th birth anniversary of Erode Venkata Ramaswamy Naicker, or as he is affectionately called Periyar (the Great Man).  In the birth anniversaries of great men who are no longer with us, it is the usual practice to highlight their greatness. According to the followers of Periyar, his greatness comes from the following:

  • He was the Tamilar Thalaivar (the leader of the Tamils), who instilled pride in the hearts and minds of the Tamils.
  • He ensured that the elites don’t take away the rights of the have nots.
  • He espoused the cause of rationalism.

Even today, intellectuals who write about Tamil society and polity continue to put forward Periyar as an important figure of social progress based mainly on the aforementioned points. They go ahead and equate Periyar with the likes of Babasaheb Ambedkar, Sree Narayana Guru and Mahatma Ayyankali.

However, these comparisons do not stand the test of accuracy. The intent of this piece is not to sketch a biography of Periyar but an attempt to re-examine the ideas and causes he espoused. That Periyar was the pioneering leader of the so-called “Dravidian” movement is beyond doubt, and it is where we need to begin. And so, the first thing that we need to examine is Periyar’s chief motivation and the wellspring from whence he derived this motivation. That wellspring was his unshakable belief in the now debunked Aryan Invasion Theory. (AIT)

It has been pointed out in an earlier piece  that the ideology of the Dravidian movement can be traced back to the works of Bishop Robert Caldwell, an evangelist and a linguist who aggressively popularized the idea of an Aryan invasion of India. In Caldwell’s analysis, the Aryans sent their agents, the sly Brahmins who through their faith now known as Hinduism enslaved the Dravidian people who were given the title of ‘Shudra.’ The main aim of Caldwell in projecting the Aryan-Dravidian divide was to make way for mass conversions because many in South India were led to believe that Hinduism is a racist cult dominated by the Aryan Brahmins.

caldwell

This belief was turned into a combative political ideology by Periyar. He saw all of South India as a separate nation from rest of what he called the ‘Aryanstan.’  To the bulk of his Tamil and other South Indian admirers, he presented Hinduism as a racist, Aryan-Brahminical cult as per Caldwell’s diktat. So obsessed was Periyar with the AIT that by the 1940s, as India approached independence from Britain, he feared that North India would take the place of Britain to dominate South India.

Periyar responded by calling for a separate nation, comprising Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam and Kannada-speaking regions—roughly corresponding to the then  Madras Presidency but failed to get British approval.Fortunately, his mangled views were only accepted in present-day Tamil Nadu, while other South Indian regions—Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, and Karnataka rejected them without batting an eyelid.

Periyar bemoaned the independence of India from British rule as he believed that the South would now become “Sanskritised” leading to a subjugation of the Tamils by the Aryans. And so the concept of Dravida Nadu was modified down, and restricted to Tamil Nadu. This then led to a proposal for a union of the Tamil people of not only South India but including those of Sri Lanka as well.

This proposal for a “sovereign Tamil” raised concerns among the Sinhalese politicians in Sri Lanka. In 1962, a Sinhalese M.P. stated in the Parliament:

The Sinhalese are the minority in Dravidistan. We are carrying on a struggle for our national existence against the Dravidistan majority.

The island nation which was already simmering with tensions between the Sinhalese majority  and Tamil minority can obliquely thank Periyar for his contribution to this sensitive issue. As for India, even today, many Tamils view themselves as a separate nationality from the rest of India, and at times, they even refuse to celebrate India’s cultural and civilizational heritage.

And so the whole claim of Periyar being a rationalist boils down to his unexamined faith in a spurious racial theory.Now, to examine the next claim that Periyar was a champion of progressive Tamil identity, a sample from his 1954 speech would be a good place to begin:

In Tamil Nadu’s entire population it seems the Brahmins are 2.75 per cent, the Christians 4 per cent, the Muslims about 5 per cent, the Malayalis 8 per cent, those from Canara are it seems 5 per cent – if we combine these, it emerges that the non-Tamils in Tamil Nadu constitute 25 per cent of the population. However, in employment these non-Tamils hold 75 per cent of the top posts. Not just that, the reason why the Tamils are suffering is because the Brahmins, Christians, Muslims and others claim themselves to be Tamil.

Without mincing any words, Periyar called for an exclusive Tamil identity. Periyar’s “Dravidian” movement also contained in it a disdain for Dalits which often manifested itself in offensive forms as can be deduced from one of Periyar’s own statements on Dalit leaders of the then Madras Presidency who were asking for social equality:

Whoever your leaders be, they parade you – as lame, diseased, blind, leprous – for money; and even without buying milk to feed you, nor applying any balm on your wounds, they further emaciate you, and display your condition to others to earn more money.

In another instance, he asked:

If Sahibs [Muslims] get proportionate representation and the Scheduled Castes get representation in jobs and education, and if the rest of the slots are monopolized by Brahmins, O Shudra, what will be your fate and future?

As for Periyar being on the same pedestal as Babasaheb Ambedkar, Sree Narayana Guru and Mahatma Ayyankali, nothing could be farther from the truth.

It is true that Periyar praised Ambedkar. However, his praises were motivated by his keenness to belittle Tamil Nadu’s Dalit leaders as cited above. Post-1947, he attacked Ambedkar for supporting a “United India.” It is correct to say that Babasaheb Ambedkar was harsh on Hindu society particularly on the question of varna. Yet, he did not fall for false propaganda. This is what Ambedkar said about the Aryan Invasion Theory:

Enough has been said to show how leaky is the Aryan theory expounded by western scholars….. Yet, the theory has such a hold on the people that what has been said against it may mean no more than scotching it. Like the snake, it must be killed…..In the face of the discovery of new facts, the theory can no longer stand and must be thrown on the scrap heap.

 

ambedkar

Mahatma Ayyankali who after numerous struggles was successful in winning educational rights for Dalits in Kerala also rejected the false Aryan-Dravidian racial constructs and steadfastly supported the efforts taken by the Arya Samaj and the Hindu Mahasabha to eradicate caste prejudices.

a

Even Sree Narayana Guru, the great apostle of social advancement in Kerala never used the racial framework to reverse the foundations of Hindu society. The Guru was able to change the Keralite society by drawing from and with the support of Hinduism without causing any social discontent.

sndp

 

On the other hand, Periyar was so deeply faithful to Caldwell’s Aryan Invasion fantasy that he actively promoted hostility towards the Brahmin community. Here is another Periyarite gem:

The Brahmin is a snake entangled in our feet. He will bite. If you take off your leg, that’s all. Don’t leave. Brahmin is not able to dominate because power is in the hands of the Tamils.

Even the great nationalist poet Subramanya Bharathi was not spared because of his caste:

They say Bharati is an immortal poet…All of Tamil Nadu praises him. Why should this be so? Supposedly because he sang fulsome praises of Tamil and Tamil Nadu. What else could he sing? His own mother tongue, Sanskrit, has been dead for years. What other language did he know? He cannot sing in Sanskrit….

Periyar’s Brahmin-hatred was unparalleled and with time and rabble rousing on a massive scale, it wasn’t long before violence followed words. The Brahmin exodus from Tamil Nadu was one of the greatest “gifts” that Periyar gave in his ascent to carving out a rational and progressive Tamil identity.  Even the modern manifestation of this anti-Brahmin stand has been detrimental and fatal as can be seen by these two incidents:

1. Recently numerous Dravidian organizations staged irate demonstrations against the central government’s decision to celebrate ‘Sanskrit Week,’ with some even threatening to attack schools if they go ahead with the celebrations.

2. In an interview given  by Kumaran Pathmanathan a former leader of the dreaded terrorist group LTTE, he claimed:

Even after Periyar is gone, his ideas have been passed to people like Prabhakaran, especially anti-Brahminism. Prabhakaran’s idea was to struggle against the Brahmins. Because of this Tamil Nadu politicians made a marvelous hero out of Prabhakaran….That’s why he made this blunder against Rajiv Gandhi.

ltte

The “blunder” was the assassination of the former PM. When asked if Dravidianism played a role in the assassination, Kumaran states:

This I cannot say yes, but you know that influence…they fed him against the Brahmins. That’s why he hated the Prime Minister of India.

The inescapable conclusion is this: Periyar gave birth to a movement which rests on an edifice of hatred to justify its existence. The Dravidian movement still practices racial hatred for Brahmins although to a lesser degree.

I think Periyar’s speeches and writings were passionate enough to inspire a whole generation of Tamils to believe in his cause. In modern day Tamil Nadu, politics is dominated by parties which subscribe to the “Dravidian” ideology crafted by Periyar—the ideology is paid lip service today, but none in that state can dare criticize it without incurring significant costs. 

 

  • Ha ha this Idiot thought Telugu came from Tamil and all South Indian languages are from Tamil. Such an brainless dumb asshole. .

  • Vaachaspathy Telugu

    EVR is a drohi who spoke against the Telugus being himself a Telugu.

    • Bhavana V

      Heis not telegu. But a kannda balija. In balija caste there is kannada nd telegu speaking based on mother tongue. My mother side kannada and father side telgu balijas we r in border area. Of two states. Both my parents don’t have ancestry from Andra.the customs that follwed in border area r kannda customs and traditions from marriage to death. Andra and telegana customs r very different from us.dont generalise very balija is telegu no we r not . As far as I see they r kannada and telegu balijas

  • twitudhay

    Better change the name of the site to idiotfacts instead of indiafacts, that suits you the best …

    • Shashikumar Kasi

      The title is perfect; and apt is the content. I have posted some reasons above substantiating my this statement. If you differ, please explain in detail.

      Thanks

    • ராஜன்

      So said a monkey

  • jean

    I think this article, by a stupid guy, needs a point by point answer and
    clarifications. I hope someone will do it.

    For my part what I want to say is:

    India is the only country in the world that kept 95% of the population as the slaves by
    another 5% – slavery and humiliation organized in the name of the religion.
    Periyar is the first in india to revolt against the system. The situation was such he did
    not have the choice but to use a provocative language.

    Jean

  • cool
  • Ram Lakshman

    A pointless half baked article with no basis what so ever…..It looks like the Brahmans are back with a Vengeance…. Long live Manusmriti, long live Sanatana Dharma

    • Shashikumar Kasi

      Periyar was a racist
      He propagated the false Aryan Invasion theory and claimed that India or Tamil Nadu belonged to Dravidian; and the Brahmins(Aryan or Hindus) invaded and imposed their religion. Well this is false and it has also been proved by Dr. Ambedkar in his book “Who were Shudras” in chapter 4.
      Periyar was ani-national
      Well, this is not my conclusion. This is what Dr. Ambedkar has hinted us. When Hindi was to be made as national language, Periyar’s group protested it and started anti-hindi campaign. In response to this Dr. Ambedkar wrote a book entitled “Thoughts on Linguistics” where he says that anyone who do not accept Hindi as our national language is not and Indian.
      Regarding Brahmanism and caste
      In his book “Annihilation of caste”, Dr. Amedkar has said that Brahmanism and caste are poison of Hinduism which has to killed. But at the same time unlike Periyar and his follower he recognizes that previously there was not caste system, it was varna. And Dr. Ambedkar states that Varna and caste are not only different but also opposite. And he goes on to say that varna is sensible as it is defined by worth and not birth.
      Unfortunately due to “So-called Brahman”, this flexible varna turned into Jati which started to become rigid and later into caste which became cruel, insensitive and in human. What is not spoken this todays caste is actually defined by Risley(Britisher). He categorized the people based on caste what we know today. Al though the fact remains that caste existed from long time and it is stupid and in human which has be removed.
      Dr. Amedkar was against caste, but he promoted religion. In the book “Annihilation of caste” he says that Religion should be the foundation of society. He even goes to define how priesthood should be there is Hinduism, which is followed today by many Bhakti movements. Dr. Ambedkar reject caste but promoted religion as the most essential pillar of society.
      I would like to open a discussion where I can share more information. Please ask questions if you have any.

      • Ram Lakshman

        There is enough Literature around to understand Periyar… I would suggest you to do so…. BTW Periyar and BR Ambedkar had a lot of differences and never get along well, but that does not make an argument who is right or wrong… They are both progressives who lived in an era of bigotry/casteism. My opinion is that their Ideas during independence was considered anti-national. And today, pretty much all of their ideas are the platform for modern day liberal/progressive idealogies in India….They are both important nation builders in their own-way, without either one we might not be what we are today….So just chill…..

        • Shashikumar Kasi

          I appreciate your candid and honest view regards to the differences in the opinion of Periyar and Ambedkar. Unfortunately many people place both of them on same pedestal as they both fought against casteism and strived to establish equality.
          However I differ on the point that both of them were considered ani-national. Ambedkar was never considered anti-national. I never came across a single work, talk or speech where he expresses any anti-national view; neither could any of the critic could should show any unambiguous statement of Ambedkar in context where he could be termed anti-national. In fact the opposite is true. Here is an excerpt from a talk of Ambekar at Columbia University on 9th May 1916
          “It may be granted that there has not been a thorough amalgamation of the various stocks that make up the peoples of India, and to a traveller from within the boundaries of India, the East presents a marked contrast in physique and even in colour to the West, as does the South to the North. But amalgamation can never be the sole criterion of homogeneity as predicated of any people. Ethnically all people are heterogeneous. It is the unity of culture that is the basis of homogeneity. Taking this for granted, I venture to say that there is no country that can rival the Indian Peninsula with respect to the unity of its culture. It has not only a geographic unity, but it has over and above all a deeper and a much more fundamental unity— the indubitable cultural unity that covers the land from end to end.”
          Ambedkar believed that nation is one and all the people are same. It is Periyar he said that the Aryan are different; not only different but also an invader. Ambedkar said that Aryans and Dravidians are same and they are not invader.
          Therefore I can conclude that Ambedkar was pro-national and Periyar was definitely anti-national. Moreover Ambedkar ventured to write a response(Thoughts on Lingustics) to Anti-Hindi movement campaigned by Dravida Kazhagam and Periyar. Below are some excerpts
          “Since Indians wish to unite and develop a common culture it is the bounden duty of all Indians to own up Hindi as their language. Any Indian who does not accept this proposal as part and parcel of a linguistic State has no right to be an Indian. He may be a hundred per cent Maharashtrian, a hundred per cent Tamil or a hundred per cent Gujarathi, but he cannot be an Indian in the real sense of the word except in a geographical sense.”
          ” The only way I can think of meeting the danger is to provide in the Constitution that the regional language shall not be the official language of the State.”
          ” With regional languages as official languages the ideal to make India one United country and to make Indians, Indians first and Indians last, will vanish. I can do no more than to suggest a way out. It is for Indians to consider it.”
          Amedkar was working to break India and Periyar was working to break India. Well, this is what I could conclude from above statement of Ambedkar.
          On one side Periyar was up in arms against caste system; but by promoting Aryan- Dravidian racism he sided an equally poisonous concept of racism. I do not deny his fight for caste system; but how can I ignore his idea of racism. Unfortunately, Dravida Kazhagam till date support Aryan-Dravidian racism just because Periyar said that. Aryan Invasion has failed- scientifically, historically and archaeologically(and Ambedkar used all these proof to debunk it).
          I also agree that Ambedkar and Periyar ideas are today the platform for nation building. But as long as Periyar idea was aligned with Ambedkar’s; it is platform for nation building. Whatever idea of Periyar was different from Ambedkar it could never helped nation building. For example Periyar wanted communism and Ambedkar was strongly against communism. Check what he has to say about communism
          “The Scheduled Castes Federation will not have any alliance with a Party like the Communist Party the objects of which are to destroy individual freedom and Parliamentary Democracy and substitute in its place a dictatorship”
          – Writing and speeches; volume 17 part1
          “The Communist system is based on force. Supposing tomorrow the dictatorship in Russia fail and we see signs of its failure, what would happen? I really like to know what would happen to Communist system. As I see it there would be bloody warfare among the Russian people for appropriating the property of the state. That would be the consequence of it”
          “..Their morality is always in a flux; there is no morality.”
          – Dr. Ambedkar’s Life and Mission.
          Well we have also seen the genocide caused by communism in millions. A good record can be found in ” The Black Book of Communism”. If our nation would have incorporated the idea of communism, things would have been really worst. Amebdkar saved us from communism and established the nation of the pillar of democracy.
          You might find my writings against Periyar but this is my support for the ideas of Ambedkar; on which periyar not only differed but was also against it. I look forward to your further inputs on this subject. I find this as a good forum to share ideas and learn more.
          Thanks

          • Ram Lakshman

            I do not deny any of what you said…All are pretty much facts, that s what Periyar was, always on your face…. To start off he was very apprehensive about independemce, he did not trust the Congress to build an inclusive nation. So basically all what he said during the day was considered plain anti-national. Coming to Babasaheb, he too was not a fan of the Congress and very apprehensive about the Idea of India that is being built…What I suggest is that a Nation is not some Utopian Monolithic Idea of Os and Xs…It is a complex collection of ideologies, concepts and tangibles. So nation building is putting all these stuff together, a little bit of Periyarism, a little bit of Ambedkarism and mixing it up…Anti-national is probably lamest thing to call someone when we are not really sure of what the Nation is….Just saying…BTW I am a Periarite who learnt Ambedkarism…

          • Shashikumar Kasi

            Thanks for accepting the falsity of Aryan invasion/ Aryan-Dravidian racism; communism and anti-hindi movement.
            I completely agree with your views regards to congress. Ambedkar has saved the nation by writing constitution on the ground of democracy and by rejecting communism.
            Regards to anti-nationalism, I quoted Ambedkar verbatim in this reards. He considered Dravida Kazhagam campaign as anti-national. It was purely his view; and I subscribe to his view. Therefore I quoted him. At the same time, I would not deny if you differ your view in this regards. You may not agree with Ambedkar’s view on definition of anti-nationalism; that is perfectly alright and I completely welcome that. You have all right to form your opinion and side any opinion. I preferred Ambedkar thoughts which is not only different from Periyar but even against him.
            I also agree with your view on nation building as a collection ideologies; and that is what constitution is all about. That is what democracy is all about. However I am bit apprehensive about mixing Periyar andAmbedkar on this. As I said earlier, that I support Periyar view on abolishing casteism and establishing equality; which is what even Ambedkar said. It is common between them. But when you say about mixing both of them, I presume that you mean that Periyar had some thoughts different from Ambedkar which should be incorporated. I am quite fishy on this subject. Could you please give me some thoughts of Periyar which was different from Ambedkar; and at the same time which can be used in national building. For examples some thoughts of Periyar which differed from Ambedkar was communism, racism, etc. but it cannot help in nation building. I would like to know some thoughts which could help in nation building.
            Thanks

  • Mamata Das

    Sandeep is doing India a great service with his research. This is an excellent article and hopefully people will read it in entirety.

    As always, fine ideas like rationality, abolishing caste and the Self Respect Movement get tarnished when hatemongers take over. Post 1947, Periyar constantly hogged attention by burning the Indian Constitution and flag till the IndoChina war of 1962 diminished the appeal of such drama.

    Basically Periyar wanted increased Tamizh clout, so he created an outsider “Aryan” Brahmin enemy to consolidate “Dravidians”. Such people only spread poison and look how generations have suffered in violence when they were supposedly being “socially reformed”. Be very careful when someone packages hatred in shiny new wrapping.

  • TamilNesan

    The article is completely half baked without divulging into the details. If you know a little bit of history, You will understand the truth in Caldwell’s statements. With regards to Periyar, The Brahmins wielded so much power during his days that broad measures to control their dominance were required. Answer me these questions, In the whole of tamil history, who gave the Brahmins the right to become Poojaris and Teachers? Who brought in the caste system that talked about Brahma’s head to feet theory? Both the settlers from Karnataka and Andhra during Vijayanagara rule and the Brahmin domination classified the groups that gave the famous tamil kings, tamil warriors, tamil traders and other groups into SC, ST, MBC, BC castes. If you are a Brahmin thank Periyar, for his measures and the Dravidian movement ensured the stupid rules affecting the brahmin ladies were put out off place. In the name of IndiaFacts dont write Rubbish.

    • suresh nath

      You forget basic fact that periyar himself descendant of so called settlers from Karnataka and Andhra .You have any evidence that Brahmins have controlled total power in Tamil Nadu then how Kamaraj become CM of TamilNadu and many entrepreneurs coming from other communities.

    • Shashikumar Kasi

      Periyar was a racist
      He propagated the false Aryan Invasion theory and claimed that India or Tamil Nadu belonged to Dravidian; and the Brahmins(Aryan or Hindus) invaded and imposed their religion. Well this is false and it has also been proved by Dr. Ambedkar in his book “Who were Shudras” in chapter 4.
      Periyar was ani-national
      Well, this is not my conclusion. This is what Dr. Ambedkar has hinted us. When Hindi was to be made as national language, Periyar’s group protested it and started anti-hindi campaign. In response to this Dr. Ambedkar wrote a book entitled “Thoughts on Linguistics” where he says that anyone who do not accept Hindi as our national language is not and Indian.
      Regarding Brahmanism and caste
      In his book “Annihilation of caste”, Dr. Amedkar has said that Brahmanism and caste are poison of Hinduism which has to killed. But at the same time unlike Periyar and his follower he recognizes that previously there was not caste system, it was varna. And Dr. Ambedkar states that Varna and caste are not only different but also opposite. And he goes on to say that varna is sensible as it is defined by worth and not birth.
      Unfortunately due to “So-called Brahman”, this flexible varna turned into Jati which started to become rigid and later into caste which became cruel, insensitive and in human. What is not spoken this todays caste is actually defined by Risley(Britisher). He categorized the people based on caste what we know today. Al though the fact remains that caste existed from long time and it is stupid and in human which has be removed.
      Dr. Amedkar was against caste, but he promoted religion. In the book “Annihilation of caste” he says that Religion should be the foundation of society. He even goes to define how priesthood should be there is Hinduism, which is followed today by many Bhakti movements. Dr. Ambedkar reject caste but promoted religion as the most essential pillar of society.
      I would like to open a discussion where I can share more information. Please ask questions if you have any.

  • Steve Bakewell

    ” even today, many Tamils view themselves as a separate nationality from the rest of India, and at times, they even refuse to celebrate India’s cultural and civilizational heritage.”

    I’m sorry but if you’re going to single out Tamils like this then we will also band-together and oppose you.. there is no need for Aryan theory hogwash.. all that is required to create a wedge between India&Tamils is the amount of animosity Tamils get from rest of Inida.

    • Jean Paridimal

      India’s heritage is Xenophobia organizd by brahamanism. Tamil culture is basically secular.

      • BenDoverUranus

        Considering how India was invaded by violent Greeks,Turks,Afghans,Persians,Brits etc etc i think India’s “xenophobia” is not completely unjustified. Heck, even now India has “neighbours” that are more dangerous than enemies(this applies to lanka&Nepal too).

        Tamil culture is basically secular.
        That is something you’re destroying by basically reducing Hinduism to institutionalized slavery(something that IS indeed sanctioned in certain very popular books from desert

        FYI Tamil history&heritage is Hindu moreso than the mughal influenced North, can you name one non Hindu Tamil freedom fighter or a king? Me neither!

  • Krishnan

    Pls do not refer Ramasamy Naicker as Periyar. This scum is the biggest fraud and hypocrite Tamil Nadu has ever seen. Did you know that
    1. His hatred towards brahmins is because at the age of 10 he stole from a brahmin’s house and he was caught and punished by his parents
    2. For someone claiming to work for women empowerment, he married a 25 year old at the age of 74…
    3. For someone professing to Tamil values, he is not a Tamilian, and he is a Kannadiga, who used to hate Tamil

    There are lots of facts about this fraud, and will need a whole book [incidentally there are a few] to write about the fraud & hypocrite that Ramasamy Naicker is…….

    • Steve Bakewell

      He is not a kannda he was born to Telugu Parents… that son of a b!tch just happened to be born in Erode Tamil Nadu.

    • Muthukumar Nadar

      well said, because of him, tamils unity & peace was destroyed, even now naam tamizhar and dmk is following this fraud.
      karunanidhi is also not tamil, he is also a big gamer.

    • Vijay

      married a 25 year old at the age of 74? like marrying a grand daughter? wow, this guy (EVR) is lustful and dangerous. really working HARD for women!

  • Ramachandran Guruswamy Iyer

    The independent movement leaders did the greatest injustice to Tamilnadu Rajaji let down Tamil speaking Brahmins by haplessly watching Periyar’s bizarre acts and made the most stupid comment– If Nayakar breaks one idol there will be hundreds of Pillaiyar idols? Rajaji et down Hinduism. Gandhiji never reacted and Nehruji sided with Periyar and supported the Aryan invasion theory of Ramayana. It is even more puzzling for a leader of caliber of Rajaji who did not openly come out with the evolution of British Many Law and he would have very well known the famous succession case of Tanjore principality from Amar Singh to The Rajah of Kolhapur vs TS Raja Iyer and others how British were exasperated by double standard of court pundits the nepotism and trustworthiness need of Andhra/Maratta Brahmin and Non Brahmin Tamil/Telugu elite. The Tamil speaking Brahmin diaspora were nowhere and they were intellectual vagabonds covering a vast area from Ganjam in the north to Kanyakumari in the south. The zBritish were skeptical about this group. But the remarkable characteristics of this group is hidden intellectual passion/superiority which they fully utilized through English education displacing all in the whole of South India and marching to North India and East Asia through Nagarathar. It is only when they began to exert their intellectual arrogance over British the British wanted to cut them. Nobody has yet analysed why Periyar Kannadiga Tuluva Balija of Vijayanagar lineage of Tuluva dynasty became famous among Tamils. The peculiarity of PERIYARISM is that it transcedents countries– It is a puzzle why KP made the obnoxious statement ANTI BRAHMIN SENTIMENT OF DRAVIDISM INFLUENCED LTTE FOR RAJIV ASSASSINATION It is even more puzzling that by not reacting Srilankan Tamils/Entire political spectrum in India acknowledges that Tamil Brahmins alone are Aryan marauders worse than Kashmiri Pundits.Why should entire Non Brahmin community in Tamilnadu — Sowrashtras/all Muslimoutfits join the bandwagon of dubbing Tamil Brahmins as Aryan marauders! Why do Rediyars and Naidus display their hatred in Tamilnadu as Aryan marauders while their counterparts in Andhra never raise Aryan bogey? Tamilnadu like Kashmir and Pakistan has become hysterical. Only in Tamilnadu a High Court can say a person may be Hindu by law and Christian by faith and allow people like Umashankar indulge in hate phobia. People in Tamilnadu never feel shy of adopting double standards abusing Hindu Gods/Brahmins in public and solicit them on the pressure given by womenfolk on the advice of astrologers. India and Indian independent leaders can never understand the double standards of Tamilnadu including Brahmins(who hide their predicament yet in public pose as if everything is same). I had the bitter experience when a Sowrashtra colleague asked me it is because of you Varna system persists to which I retorted Friend you have chosen a wrong person since myself is cursing forefathers in begetting children when they themselves are intellectual vagabonds having no place. You should better ask a Gujarati Brahmin and not myself. His face became red. Still I don’t know what Tamilnadu wants. MGR boldly declared which Periyar failed–The Religion ofvTamilnadu is Tamilism when he was ridiculed.Nobody compels Tamilians to be Hindus. Yes Tamil speaking Brahmins alone Aryan Marauders and Tamilnadu can get rid of them and let their religion be Tamilism. Heavens will not fall ifcTamilnadu is devoid of Hinduism or Tamil speaking Brahmins. After it will be will of God.

    • Muthukumar Nadar

      dravidian concept is meaningless, they are telling that all south states are dravidians but not tamil brahmins.
      if this is the case what about malayali brahmin and tulu brahmin,
      it is just a game played by ramaswamy naicker to break the unity of tamils for his personal benefits
      and he is not a tamil, karunanidhi is also not a tamil and plays big games to increase his family’s wealth.
      Might be ramaswamy naicker’s cunningness have been identified by tamil brahmins and hence to escape from them avaru indha madhiri oru vishayatha thee koluthi vittutaru.

      Everybody must become aware and be united and make TN a heaven

      • suresh nath

        Brother, your correct. Periyar is British agent and bribed by Christian Missionaries in order to dilute Indian Freedom Struggle and propagating Christianity in such away that spreading hatred against Brahmins leads downfall of Hinduism. Brahmins knew the trick but they cannot match cunning nature of periyar. What a sad matter that except Devars and Vanniyars all other communities goes behind Peiyar and stood against Brahmains.

  • Satchitanand

    Very well analyzed article. Truth is coming out!

  • m p

    Superb article exposing Periyar’s hypocrisy. All the periyar slogans of rationalism, atheism, anti-brahminism, dravidian racism, etc were nothing but weapons to attack Hinduism.

    Rationalism — Is it rational to believe in bogus racial theories, marxism, and have irrational hatred towards tiny brahmin minority. Periyar’s excuse for hating brahmin is similar to nazi excuse for hating jews.

    Atheism — Periyar converted to Buddhism. How could you believe in Lord Buddha and be atheist at same time?

    • please fund IB

      Periyar and more so his current generation followers are big hypocrites. They attack hinduism in teh name ot raiotnalism but wont speak anything againts the church or mulsim ulema and emancipation of muslim women…. They dont haev guts to criticize thus exposing their baised nature. Also, they hit brahmis who hardly hit back in their style…. thus leading ot mass exodus of brahmins from villages to urban centres… nad then to other countries

      • Jesadimai PangiRaj

        Bitch please. We speak against all religions. We hate them all.

    • Steve Bakewell

      Also he’s NOT a Tamil.. he shouldn’t be praised by Tamils period..

  • harihara

    irrespective of time and space and level of civilization, anyone showing a disklike for something, some subject, without actually studying and experiencing that something ,can only be called as unfair and the fanatic ones among them as- childish They cannot be called “great”

  • N.Paramasivam

    They go ahead and equate Periyar with the likes of Babasaheb Ambedkar, Sree Narayana Guru and Mahatma Ayyankali.

    However, these comparisons do not stand the test of accuracy//

    This is Correct. Article dealt correctly and presented beautifully. He is nowhere near the great three sons of Mother India.