Ten People You Will Definitely Meet in Hell: A 2016 List

If history has taught us anything it is that the world is full of people with the propensity and ability to do great evil.

If history has taught us anything it is that the world is full of people with the propensity and ability to do great evil. Some are barbaric by their very nature, others are able to commit cruel acts because of their religion while still others contribute to human misery by their self-serving actions.
Since there have been a lot of evil people throughout history, it can be quite difficult narrowing it down to just 10 people. Also, different countries have their own local rogues so they may feel left out if they don’t find their favourite villains below. But you are unlikely to find fault with this list of nasty people who have caused untold human misery.

So on this new year, it pays to peruse this list and keep these folks in mind.

10. Yahya Khan

yahyaIt took Adolf Hitler 12 years to round up and kill six million European Jews, but the Pakistanis led by their President Yahya Khan killed three million of their own Bengali citizens in less than a year. The Punjabis of Pakistan’s western half had such a racist, visceral hatred for their Muslim brethren in the eastern half that Yahya is recorded as saying in fury: “Kill three million of them, and the rest will eat out of our hands.” Ten million Bengalis fled to India. The disruption of normal life in the region was of such a cataclysmic nature that more than 30 million people – that’s nearly half the population – left the cities and went to the villages.

It is believed more than two million of those killed were Hindus. The rest, over a million, comprised Awami League members, students and academics. The Pakistanis then targeted women and raped at least 200,000. Among Yahya’s executioners in East Pakistan was General A.A.K. Niazi, who let loose his Punjabi and Pathan soldiers on the defenceless womenfolk, saying: “Main iss haramzadi qaum ki nasal badal doonga.” (“I will transform the breed of this bastard race.”) (http://tribune.com.pk/story/405014/genetic-engineering-in-east-pakistan/)

The saddest part is that after the surrender of 93,000 Pakistan Army soldiers to the Indian Army, none of these soldiers or generals were held accountable. India’s victorious generals not only prevented Bengali guerrillas from taking revenge on these Pakistani soldiers, but worse they ensured the comfort of these scumbags in POW camps for more than a year.

There is a special place in hell for Yahya.

9. Talat Pasha

talatNot many may have heard about the name of this genocidal maniac, but what he did is reasonably well known. Talat Pasha (http://imgur.com/gallery/YeCD7) was the Grand Vizier of the Sultan in the Ottoman Empire from 1917 to 1918. In 1915 he issued an order to wipe out the Armenian race, forcing the entire population of Armenia – then under Turkish rule – into concentration camps.

People were overloaded with supplies and forced to trudge miles with no food and they were killed if they couldn’t continue. People were naked when they marched. The whole male population of Angora was exterminated. Out of the population of 2.5 million Armenians, 1 to 1.5 million people were killed. Talat was killed in 1921 by an Armenian assassination squad.

Hell isn’t a complete place without Talat.


8. Dick Cheney

cheneySeventeen of the 19 hijackers of 9/11 were Saudi Arabians and yet the US invaded Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with Islamic terror. US Vice President Dick Cheney lied and fabricated evidence to get the US to go to war with Iraq. This led to the destruction of a secular country, its infrastructure, its army but more tragically the war caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and displacement of millions. American, British and European soldiers used Iraqi civilians as target practice in an orgy of violence that lasted more than a decade.

Cheney also authorised physical and sexual abuse, torture, rape, sodomy and murder of Iraqi prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison by the US Army and the Central Intelligence Agency.

Worse, he used the war to make billions for his old company Halliburton. This makes it very likely that he destroyed an entire country with a view to make money for himself and his cronies.

Iraq was once a bulwark against Islamic fundamentalism but America’s war is directly responsible for the emergence of Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

The reason Cheney’s boss for eight years isn’t here is because George W. Bush was “an ignorant person who wanted to show his mother he could do things his father couldn’t”. (http://www.rawstory.com/2015/07/dick-cheney-should-and-eventually-will-be-tried-as-a-war-criminal-former-international-court-judge/) Cheney was the Svengali who prodded the IQ-challenged Bush to invade Iraq.

Dick is likely to be singled out for special treatment in hell.

7. Pol Pot

pol potWhat’s unique about Pol Pot, the Prime Minister of Cambodia from 1976 to 1979, is that he wiped out 25 to 33 per cent of the population of his country – that’s nearly three million.

Pol Pot represents the ultimate fantasy of communists – to destroy their ‘class enemies’. His plan was to uproot the civilisation of Cambodia and turn it into an agrarian society and turn people into workers and peasants. He is the only man in history that ordered an official genocide against his whole country and he declared that the Buddhist religion, money, schools, markets and personal possessions would all be banned. His communist government forced mass evacuations of cities. People were separated from friends and families.

Torture of class enemies happened on a massive scale, with millions including the elderly, pregnant women and children beaten to death after being forced to work for insanely long hours. You would be expected to work until you dropped dead. Doctors, teachers, engineers and other skilled people were systematically killed.

Pol Pot was supported both by the Chinese and the Americans, who saw him as an enemy of the Vietnamese.

Cambodia’s nightmare finally ended in December 1985 when the highly professional Vietnamese army invaded the country and completely destroyed Pol Pot’s headquarters. He fled to Thailand and after a few years moved to China, where he was treated for cancer.

Pol Pot died in April 1998 of natural causes but is surely undergoing a painful time in hell.

6. Timur

timurMurderous tyrants fill history’s pages, but Timur of Samarkand was cruel towards both men and beast. Among his favourite pastimes was throwing elephants down steep cliffs.

Once a bandit and cattle rustler, Timur conquered Persia and Mesopotamia, invaded Russia, Georgia, Syria, Turkey and India. At Baghdad he had 90,000 of the inhabitants beheaded so that he could build towers with their skulls. At Sivas in Turkey, where he promised no bloodshed in return for surrender, he had 3,000 prisoners buried alive and pointed out that he had kept to the letter of his oath. (http://www.historytoday.com/richard-cavendish/death-tamerlane#sthash.FKRhUxjN.dpuf) He also captured the Ottoman Sultan and his wives, kept the Sultan in a cage in his parlour and had his wives get naked and serve everyone food and drinks.

In 1397, Timur invaded Delhi which was then ruled by Sultan Nasiruddin Mahmud of the Tughlaq Dynasty. The entire stretch of land extending from the Khyber Pass to the northern plains was scorched by massacres, rape, pillage and kidnapping.

Strong resistance from the Sarv Khap coalition of the Jats made Timur even more vengeful than usual. After defeating the Sultan, he entered Delhi and left it in ruins. More than 100,000 Hindu slaves had been seized by his soldiers and camp followers. Even a ‘pious’ Muslim saint had 15 slaves. All of them were slaughtered before the attack on Delhi for fear that they might rebel.

During the ransacking of Delhi, almost all inhabitants not killed were brought out and distributed as slaves among Timur’s nobles. In his memoirs, he claims his 15,000 Turks each “secured from 50 to 100 prisoners….there was no man with less than 20” and that “women were obtained in such quantities as to exceed all count”.

Timur declared his army had only killed Hindus and spared Muslim civilians. That’s rich coming from someone who wiped out the city of Baghdad.

Timur is most likely being repeatedly thrown off a steep cliff into a lava lake in hell.

5. Alamgir Aurangzeb

AurangzebThere’s a reason Canadian Tarek Fatah (http://www.firstpost.com/living/why-i-danced-when-i-found-out-delhis-aurangzeb-road-was-being-renamed-after-dr-apj-abdul-kalam-2414280.html) said he danced at 2.00 in the night when he heard Delhi’s Aurangzeb Road had been renamed after APJ Abdul Kalam.

Aurangzeb was a piece of shit singularly responsible for the continuing Hindu-Muslim divide in India. The Mughal emperor came to the throne by murdering his scholarly older brother and heir apparent Dara Shikoh and blinding his young children.

He claimed he was (unsuccessfully) “endeavouring to destroy the ancient sovereignties of this country”. According to Fatah, “Aurangzeb today would be the equivalent of Caliph El-Baghdadi of the Islamic State (ISIS), if not Osama Bin Laden or Mullah Omar of the Taliban.”

Here was a man who had killed his elder brother to stage a palace coup, who had his own father imprisoned for life and had several Islamic leaders of India hanged to death, among them the spiritual head of the Dawoodi Bohra Muslims of Gujarat.
As emperor, Aurangzeb banned music, dance and the consumption of alcohol in the Mughal Empire. In Sindh and Punjab where many Muslims attended discourses by Hindu Brahmins, he ordered the demolition of all schools and the temples where such interaction took place, making it punishable for Muslims who dressed like non-Muslims.

But nothing is more of a testimony to the cruelty and bigotry of Aurangzeb than the executions of the Muslim Sufi mystic Sarmad Kashani and the ninth Sikh Guru, Tegh Bahadur. He considered the majority Hindus of his realm as ‘Kufaar’ and placed them as second class to Muslims, waged jihad against Shia Muslim rulers and wiped out all traces of the liberal, pluralistic and tolerant Islam introduced by his great-grandfather Emperor Akbar.

Islam, under the influence of Hinduism and the strong and sustained Hindu resistance, had lost its edge in India. By the time of emperor Shah Jahan in the late 1680s, a unique culture had formed in northern India, with Islam ready to shed its terrorist outlook towards other religions. Dara Shikoh, who translated the Rig Veda and other ancient Hindu texts, was symbolic of this remarkable transformation –albeit not without the resistance of the Islamic clergy – in Islam.

However, Aurangzeb not only set the clock back on this reconciliation but alienated all his Hindu allies. The partition of India (although British midwifed) can be attributed to the divide dug by this terrorist emperor.

His legacy lives on in the hearts of many Indian Muslims who regard him as a true Muslim as against the apostate Akbar. A young reporter whose byline can be seen in the Hindustan Times goes by the name of Aurangzeb. That some Indian Muslims continue to name their sons after an emperor most hated by Hindus is an indication of their fundamentalist mindset.

Hell is the right place for such a scumbag.

4. Adolf Hitler

hitlerAdolf Hitler needs no introduction. Compared with other tyrants, he may have killed far fewer people but where he’s head and shoulders above the other is the Teutonic efficiency of his killing machine.

Hitler’s Nazi regime was responsible for the deaths of more than 11 million people including 6 million Jews, 3 million Russians, 3 million non-Jewish Poles, 750,000 non-Russian Slavs, 500,000 Gypsies, 100,000 of the mentally ill, 100,000 Freemasons and 15,000 homosexuals. His actions caused the deaths of over 50 million people.

He believed Jews and Slavs were untermenschen or less than human, and therefore had to be eradicated from the face of the earth. His plan was to separate Jewish men from the women permanently and then work them to death so that within a few years there would be no Jew left in Europe. His Nazi cronies and scientists devised more efficient gas chambers that could kill tens of thousands of Jews an hour.

After dealing with the Jews, Hitler next planned to conquer Russia and turn Moscow into a lake in order to destroy the symbol of Slavic power. His plan for the Slavs was to transport them all beyond the Urals so that the entire stretch of land from the Atlantic to the Urals would be populated only by ‘superior’ Germans and Nordic races.

Hitler also refused to shake hands with Subhas Chandra Bose when the Indian leader approached him for joint war against Britain. Hitler’s refusal to allow captured Indian POWs to fight against British imperial troops may have cost him the war in Africa.

Not only did the Russians kick his butt hard, but he died knowing that Russia would take half his country.

Adolf has a permanent membership of hell.

3. Mohandas Gandhi

gandhiMohandas Gandhi’s pacifism has caused great harm to India and Hindus. Muslims refused to listen to him and attacked Hindus who had been effectively disarmed by Gandhi’s appeals for peace. This encouraged Muslims to attack Hindus even more because they knew Hindus weren’t going to retaliate.

Had Hindus been allowed to attack Muslims, or at least be prepared to defend themselves with weapons, the cycle of Muslim violence could have been nipped in the bud. By going on hunger fasts against Hindus retaliating, Gandhi was the chief villain of Partition.

Hundreds of thousands of Hindus were killed and thousands of women raped because of Gandhi’s imposed pacifism. He advocated a senseless surrender to murder.

According to Indologist and orientalist Koenraad Elst, “The fundamental problem with Gandhi’s pacifism, not in the initial stages but when he had become the world-famous leader of India’s freedom movement (1920-47), was his increasing extremism. All sense of proportion had vanished when he advocated non-violence not as a technique of moral pressure by a weaker on a stronger party, but as a form of masochistic surrender.”

Gandhi’s advice to the victims of communal violence was “breathtaking for its callousness in the face of human suffering”. During his prayer meeting on 1 May 1947, he prepared the Hindus and Sikhs for the anticipated massacres of their kind in the upcoming state of Pakistan with these words:

“I would tell the Hindus to face death cheerfully if the Muslims are out to kill them. I would be a real sinner if after being stabbed I wished in my last moment that my son should seek revenge. I must die without rancour. You may turn round and ask whether all Hindus and all Sikhs should die. Yes, I would say. Such martyrdom will not be in vain.”

Worse, believing he was some kind of mahatma (great soul), he tried to prove his self-control by often sleeping and bathing naked with other women. These women included his grandniece, Manu, and the wife of his grandnephew, who were both 18 when they started sleeping in the same bed as Gandhi, who was 77 years old at the time.

Graeme Donald writes in Lies, Damned Lies and History: A Catalogue of Historical Errors and Misunderstandings: “All had to sleep naked and, just to make doubly sure of his resolve, Gandhi would take them to bed in pairs. Some as young as 12, several girls later acknowledged that they did often ‘render service’ to Gandhi but refused to elaborate.”

Donald adds that the girls were selected for their “pertness” to “stiffen his resolve” for celibacy. “Very much a case of ‘damn, failed again, must try harder tomorrow night.”

Such a man belongs in hell and you will certainly meet him there.

2. Mother Teresa

teresaMother Teresa took money stolen from pensioners by financial fraud artist Charles Keating. She accepted donations from the murderous dictator Haitian dictator Jean-Claude Duvalier. She was also a friend of Enver Hoxha, the communist dictator of Albania.

Worse, Teresa’s 600 missions in 123 countries have been described as “homes for the dying” by visiting doctors. The doctors observed a significant lack of hygiene, even unfit conditions, as well as a shortage of actual care, inadequate food and no painkillers. ”There is something beautiful in seeing the poor accept their lot, to suffer it like Christ’s passion. The world gains much from their suffering,” was her reply to criticism.

Her nuns were not provided with medical advice, the use of mosquito repellents, or information about malaria and vaccinations because Teresa believed “God” would look after the nuns. One of her nuns got into trouble with the order for helping a man with dysentery who was in danger of dying. Teresa quoted Peter 2:18-23, which orders slaves to obey their masters even if they are abusive and difficult, and used this text to urge her nuns to obey superiors without question.

And she was a hypocrite. Each time Teresa herself fell sick she sought the finest medical care. Despite the fact that medical tourists from the West travel to India for treatment, Teresa reckoned India wasn’t good enough for her. She was admitted to California’s Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation.

Teresa was stingy even during national emergencies. During numerous floods in India she offered numerous prayers and medallions of the Virgin Mary but no direct or monetary aid.

All the abandoned children who are taken in Teresa’s missions are brought up as Christians. In India Teresa was (and her mission continues to be) actively engaged in proselytising work, which is not only illegal but will negatively impact India’s complex social hierarchy.

For her lies, taking stolen cash and letting little children suffer painful deaths, she is a favourite member of hell.

1. Winston Churchill

winstonThis sick scumbag deservedly takes the pole position in this list.

Like Yahya Khan, the British managed to outdo Hitler and his Nazi cohorts. The Nazis murdered 6 million Jews in 12 years but their Teutonic cousins, the British, managed to kill almost 4 million Indians in just over a year, with Prime Minister Winston Churchill cheering from the sidelines.

Australian biochemist Dr Gideon Polya has called the Bengal Famine a “manmade holocaust” because Churchill’s policies were directly responsible for the disaster. He knowingly and enthusiastically caused the famine in 1942-43 by transferring vast quantities of foodgrain from India to Britain.

Churchill was totally remorseless in diverting food to the British troops and Greek civilians. To him, the starvation of anyhow underfed Bengalis (was) less serious than sturdy Greeks. When the British administrators urged him to release food stocks for India, Churchill responded with a telegram asking why Gandhi hadn’t died yet.

Churchill’s hostility toward Indians has long been documented. At a War Cabinet meeting, he blamed the Indians themselves for the famine, saying they “breed like rabbits”. His attitude toward Indians may be summed up in his words to Amery: “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion.” On another occasion, he insisted they were “the beastliest people in the world next to the Germans”.

According to author Madhusree Mukerjee, “Churchill’s attitude toward India was quite extreme, and he hated Indians, mainly because he knew India couldn’t be held for very long.”

The fact is the British Prime Minister possessed an extraordinary range of prejudices. During World War II, in a memorandum to the war cabinet about policy towards Italy, he wrote: “All the industrial centres should be attacked in intense fashion, every effort being made to terrorise the population.”

He also pushed for the firebombing of German population centres such as Dresden, Leipzig and Chemnitz which killed 200,000 civilians in 1945. It was the only way the British were able to announce they were in the war.

In 1944, Churchill okayed a cataclysmic plan to convert Germany into a “country primarily agricultural and pastoral in its character”. The Morgenthau Plan if implemented would have starved 10 million Germans to death in the first year alone. US President Franklin Roosevelt said Churchill was “bought off” after the Americans agreed to offer Britain $6.5 billion in Lend Lease.

No human being deserves to be in hell more than Winston Churchill.

Rakesh is a journalist at New Zealand’s leading media house. He mostly writes on defence and foreign affairs.
His articles have been quoted extensively by universities and in books on diplomacy, counter terrorism, warfare, and development of the global south; and by international defence journals.
Rakesh’s work has been cited by leading think tanks and organisations that include the Naval Postgraduate School, California; US Army War College, Pennsylvania; Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC; State University of New Jersey; Institute of International and Strategic Relations, Paris; BBC Vietnam; Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk; Centre for Air Power Studies, New Delhi; Institute for Defense Analyses, Virginia; International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, Washington DC; Stimson Centre, Washington DC; Foreign Policy Research Institute, Philadelphia; and Institute for Strategic, Political, Security and Economic Consultancy, Berlin.
His articles have been published by the Centre for Land Warfare Studies, New Delhi; Foundation Institute for Eastern Studies, Warsaw; and the Research Institute for European and American Studies, Greece, among others.
  • Ken Fawcett

    Tell us what they look like when you meet the there!

  • Hipo

    what about antonio manio

  • Sledgehammer

    The top three scoundrels made my day.

  • Romi

    Sometimes it take tremendous courage to speak up and report FACT. This article shows such courage that i could not believe a journalist in India would dare write it. Then i realised , with relief, he is not in India, good for him. Wish he was here, and it was possible to do real journalism and be successful right here, not just where the author is now. But never mind, at least the INTERNET make it possible to benefit from his courage.

  • Prem Kapoor

    Oh Duratma Gandhi , We Curse You !!!
    Oh Duratma Gandhi !
    You are still a Hot Topic
    For a debate
    People take sides debating over you,
    blog’s, forum’s and groups and
    Make themselves illusive fools
    Of modern India
    These days your charm is on RSS too,
    Beside hypocritical Hindus
    They lost their senses & started owning you
    In the name of soft Hindutva RSS now,
    Became a symbol of treachery, by praising you.
    As they are unable to face “sickliar”
    Gangs of media, brain dead politicians
    And the intellectuals in coma
    Suddenly RSS found Villainous act
    In Godse’s tribute of eliminating you
    Cowardly they condones His patriotic act
    to wash away the stigma of killing you,
    But we love the ever born great avenger,
    Who laid his life for Hindu cause!
    Nathuram,you deserve greatness
    You were so cunning and clever politician
    That you saw the future Indian Rupee with your photo
    And you spent your mind in making it happen
    You, time and again changed your actions
    Only to establish Yourself as the sole leader of India
    For this autocratic Hitlerism we curse you!
    Hey Duratma , unlike cowardly hypocritical
    Brain dead HINDUS,
    We,Hindu youth are still against you
    We never forget that, You were that Villain
    Because of whom my motherland got vivisected
    You have pampered the Muslim thugs
    And sow the seeds of partition
    For this Oh Duratma Gandhi We curse You !

  • Pranav

    There are lot of names left out in the list the likes of Stalin, Mao et al

  • Indian

    Sir u left out Red Rags like Stalin, Mao, Reksas the beasts who killed more than all 10 combined above n the Indian Chinese n Soviet (Now Italian shitlickers) products, Nambodiripad, Bardhan, Surjeet,Jyoti Basu AND WHR DO U EXPECT SONIA.Hell of hells

  • AdvaitaRocks

    It is appalling to see that the same website indiafacts.org which places Ramana Maharshi at a very high level reserves a place for Gandhi in hell ! We can only conclude that the author has no clue what Bhagavan Ramana said about Gandhi. In case people are interested, here it is, and I quote:

    (Page 11)
    When Rajendra Prasad, a leading Congress politician came to Ramanasramam and asked Bhagavan for a message to take back to Gandhi, Bhagavan replied, ‘Adhyatma sakti [the primordial power of the Self] is working within him and leading him on. That is enough. What more is necessary?’

    [Bhagavan again says in reply to a question …]

    Gandhiji has surrendered himself to the Divine and works accordingly with no self-interest. He does not concern himself with the results but accepts them as they turn up.

    [Is the above not LIVING the Gita – Sarva Dharmaan parityajya ..and Kamanyevaadhikaaraste …?]

    (Page 15)
    Papaji, who was briefly an attendant of his in the 1940s, has recorded the following extraordinary story that shows the depth of Gandhi absorption in the divine:

    He [Gandhi] was a great saint. I could see that just by looking at his body. I didn’t need to look into his eyes. He had the most sattvic body I have ever seen. It was copper-coloured and on a subtle level it was glowing with the light of Brahman. He had a beautiful body. The only body that I have seen that was as beautiful as his was the Maharshi’s. Both of their bodies used to shine. I was once sitting with Gandhi when I heard the sound of ‘Ram Ram’ coming from him. His lips were not moving so I looked to see where the sound was coming from. As I focused on the source of the sound, I realised that it was emanating from his body. The sound was coming out of the pores of his skin. He didn’t need to repeat the name anymore. It was going on continuously inside him and flowing outwards through his skin.

    The whole pdf file is also available:


    It is tragic that people who do not even do the basic study of the lives our own people write outrageous articles.

  • Dr. MS

    You can call Gandhi naive…but to equate him to Hitler shows the level of Indian stupidity on this website. It gives plenty of fodder to colonialists who will say, “Look at Simha…these guys equate Gandhi with Hitler. Tells you how stupid they are and how supremacists they are. These Hindus flog their own kind, flog their own women and their Gandhis. They are not different than the fundamentalists in the Middle East…except they are stupid. They don’t know how to evaluate their own people objectively or fairly without being extra harsh to their own kind. Low level unevolved human beings. Lets give more money and weapons to Pakistan to beat these shi&^ heads!”

    Note from Pakistan: “IndiaFacts…working for Pakistan, Mossad, MI5, CIA…while pretending to be helping Hindu victims and claiming to help Hinduism be better understood around the world. IndiaFacts…working against Indian unity and actual Hindus”.

    Simha, I once respected your articles…now I believe you are an idiot.

    • Indian

      You are a bloody 2 bit Rag, a Hidden Jesus Maniac like the Leftist Loon Arya (Fake Name above as Xian demons and Leftist Lunatics are adept at hiding their identities, as they are so ashamed of their parents acharacters, despite left loonies pride at being prds of unknown fathers), you also hide your bloody identity, A paid Italian Vatican slu parader, who asked your certificate, YOU ARE A STREET FOOL. DR IN WHAT, YOU ARE A CRAP AND YOUR CERTIFICATE IS NOT WORTH EVEN THE STREET DOGSHIT, LIKE THAT VATICAN AAP LOON ARYA. TAKE UR BLOODY CRAP ON ON YOUR BILLION BF SCROLL.IN

  • Rajat Datta

    Josef Stalin also needs to be included in this list. He outdid even Hitler in terms of sheer brutality and sadism.

  • Cybil Peril

    Nehru should have been included for his sins against India and her majority ppl.

  • Naanu Naanu

    This article is a bit extreme, but is backed with facts.

    Yes, Gandhi, for all his glory, his pacifism doomed his countrymen.

    It’s one of a kind list, to see Hitler & Gandhi in the same list.

  • raxxx

    What about the peodo called Muhammed? who also claimed he was a prophet who was talking to one and only one true God. And who still has so much power that till today so many innocents are getting killed each day by his followers, including 145 school going kids in peshawar.

  • Pingback: Our 16 Favourites of 2015: Editors’ Picks | IndiaFactsIndiaFacts()

  • Mukesh Bahri

    The most deserving is Mohammad the founder of islam under the banner of which terror was introduced in the world.

  • Pingback: Ten People You Will Definitely Meet in Hell: A 2016 List. Brilliant Piece by Rakesh Krishnan Simha - Satyameva Jayate()

  • Politeindian

    While I agree with most of the names in the list, I would include Karl Marx too. He was a scumbag who “invented” the communist nonsense which has harmed mankind immensely. His views about India also underscores his deserved inclusion in the list.

    According to me, that scoundrel is the third most overrated man in history. No prizes for guessing who the first two are (Hint – Two religious figures whose cults have wrought indescribable havoc on mankind).

    • prashants5 .

      Karl Marx never visited India or have seen India. So his view about India were from hearsay and out of his own delusions.

    • Arya

      not two religious head………JESUS fault????? he was SAINT…..m PROUD SANATANI bt i respect JESUS…….n i dont follow JESUS TOO…….he was SAINT…..don demonize him……….for the ills of CHRISTIANITY or CHURCH ORG

    • Arya

      Marx was genius……we cannot follow his policy as its impractical…..bt his ideologies and mvment creates scenario for the upliftment of labour and lower echelon of people and weakening elitism and aristocracy…..

      so he deserve HEAVEN albeit we must not go for carbon copy of implementation of his ideologies….

      • Cybil Peril

        Only theoretical, not practical. USSR broke off and China is now looking for business in rest of world needing to open her doors. China of Mao is transformed lot…. only in sixty odd years….

  • Usha

    I would put Teresa first in the list as she caused incredible harm to India while pretending to be an ‘angel.’

  • Shreevalsan

    You forgot to include Barkha Dutt, Rajdeep Sardesai, Sagarika Ghose, Karan Thapar, Veer Sanghvi, Tarun Tejpal, Rana Ayyub, Arnab Goswami etc etc etc. Surely, they cant go to Heaven. LOL!

    • Surya Narayana Venkata Nishtal

      This is only for the first 10 places ! All these Presstitute Scumbags are just ” Local Rogues and Shit-eaters of Sonia “. Sure ! They’ll also be in Hell only , pimping for the inmates !

  • अहं ब्रह्म अस्मि

    Heaven & Hell are temporary constructs according to our belief system. I’d rather be more comfortable with the idea of them being reincarnated as stones somewhere, and, people peeing on them.

    • nanda

      Haahahahaha coool !!!!
      but will be devoid of pain which they inflicted on others..

      • अहं ब्रह्म अस्मि

        Not really. So the idea is that they would spend some time in hell and undergo pain (or whatever the author has suggested). Then, would get reincarnated. This process is consistent with dharmic world view.

        • nanda

          OK , then its fair enough, else i felt it would be too soft a treatment, missed the period they would spend in hell :))

  • Here is top 2 in the list.
    1. The 2 Prominent Prophets of the 2 Major Abrahamic Religions Today for spreading hatred amongst Human beings with believer and non-believer bullshit.
    followed by
    2. Asoka and Buddha together occupying the next slot.

    nehru would be the chaprasi, bootlicker and court jester of these people on the list.

    • Rohit Raj

      why jesus and budhha?

    • Arya

      why ashoka and buddha and why even jesus……they were not………..this is wrong…….by this, u r making others not to trust even ur genuine reason…..

      • you are an aapturd!
        Are you jesuit?

        • Arya

          I’m proud SANATANI …….and having fierce attitude towards those who try to harm our civilization………. bt i don hate others just bcos they are different……2ndly……i m staunch SANATANI…..bt i respect BUDDHA/JESUS and other saint……bt i don follow them……m follower of RAM/KRISHNA/SHIVA as its not practical to follow BUDDHA , as he did not face problem facing us…..cannot follow JESUS as he got crucified by rabid daemonic group n he cud not do anyth………….bt i respect them…..

          i follow RAM ,Krishna, Shiva bcos they believe in destroying daemon……

          3rdly…..i don support AAP albeit m in support of alternative polity in country in regional election……..bt in National Polity….only BJP…….

          • But I still don’t believe you since you are affiliated with AAP.

          • Arya

            m not affiliated wid AAP…..hav been core supporter of BJP since time immemorial 😛 , btw…..does it matter…..our discussion sud consists logic and facts only………not our identity or political orientation……

          • Indian

            HA HA HA HA a Jesus Vatican Mass Murdering pimp of Italian Opus Dei (Xian ISIS) pretending to be false Hindu…Hi Lefty Loon ITS DEMON not DAEMON like Doremon, anyway AAP read this site itself 4 your Demon Kejri’s financer the Ford and killing of Indian children

          • Arya

            this is called ‘Bal ka khal nikalna’, btw u hav keen eye….2nd…..whether m AAP/BJP/Congress supporter….does it matter……only logic n facts…… don act like peaceful community members…..we r known for SHASTRATHA……dis way….u r making fence-sitters repel away from u and ur ideology…do u want it?

            n m not leftist….instead i hate Indian Leftist…..dey r not even leftist….dey r defeatist…..

    • Romi

      why Buddha?

      i agree with your other points, especially the Abrahamaic ‘prophets’. maybe ashoka wasn’t a good person initially, but he did try to change, and he was far better than any other comparable emperor of other civilizations.

  • slayer98

    why left Nehru for he is not a ‘local rogue’ but an ‘international’ one.

    • Rohit Raj

      Nehru was a fool but not a criminal

      • Deva C

        But that fool has resulted in loss of lives of Kashmiri Hindus today.

      • Cybil Peril

        He hated Hindus including his bitchy daughter who once remarked, “Marry a Hindu, hooooo…”. Such was a remorse of Nehrus for coloured Hindus. Indira liked white skin instead and her romance is well known. How many Indians know a Memuna Begum secretly married Feroze Khan aka Gandhi in a London Mosque and converted into Islam – Memuna Begum.

        Nehru wasn’t fool but he fooled.

        • Dr. MS

          You have a name like Cybil Peril and you are commenting on somebody else’s Indian authenticity? Very cunning and hypocritical. It is like a whole bunch of Christians in India who for some reason give their children names from the First Testament and want to migrate to Israel, or work only with Jews in Silicon Valley. Some have told me this directly. Very strange. That is colonial. Do you not see it?

          Marrying someone just because their skin color is dark is as racist as marrying someone for their fair skin. You marry for love, respect, partnership, support and hope. Paying attention to religion and race for marriage is not Hindu. It might be cultural…but it is not Hinduism, nor recommended or written in Hinduism. Just as converting or converting others is also not Hindu.

          Who are you to comment on Indira Gandhi’s decision to marry another Indian…who happens to be a Parsee. There is something wonderful, daring and truly Hindu to intercaste, inter-religious, international marriage…without conversion of course. Stop being a colonial sexist arse*&&^% and degrading us Indian women. You are least Indian or Hindu. Who are you to comment?

          • Cybil Peril

            What’s your need to lecture me similarly as you dared to question me. Yes, I have every right to question her personal life being a public figure on whom depended the fate n future of entire country people including “ME”. You may not want it but I do. Yes as a legitimate citizen of India, I should and must ask this question. You need to do better home work before trolling n lecturing imbecile verbosity.

          • Samrat Bharat

            OK. Since personal lives effect others…let’s ask some more Qs.

            Why is Modi not taking good care of his wife who was married off to him as a minor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jashodaben_Narendrabhai_Modi?

            Why make the legally wedded wife of India’s PM file RTIs to get basic information http://goo.gl/bEc6vq ?

          • Cybil Peril

            How do u know, Modi is or isn’t taking good care of his “married” of wife while being minor (as per ur version) that I take as true? So where is ur issue if someone filed PIL to get information? But why did ppl not file pils to find out the corrupt treasure earnings of Sonia and her pappu out of sources that are inimical to the sovereignty and security of India? Have u got any concern for it? I suppose no, Mr Samrat Bharat. Fake Samrat….lol…

          • Samrat Bharat

            PIL? That is quite different from RTI, which Mrs Modi herself filed. Twice.

            Subramanian Swamy has already filed enough complaints, and with real information to get SG & RG into trouble. Why confuse courts with duplicate PILs with no new information? Unless of course you have better proof than Swamy. In which case, why the hell are you sitting on it?

            But back to topic. I already added the link to my source. It is not just “as per ur version”.

          • Rajat Datta

            There are serious doubts as to whether or not Feroze Gandhi was parsee. I agree with what you have written but Indira can be questioned as she sure does not represent Indian women. Indira Gandhi cannot be an icon for anyone.

          • Samrat Bharat

            There are serious doubts about the mental stability of those who have doubts like that about Feroze Gandhi. Typical conspiracy nut cases, who make up back-fitting stories to cover for their propaganda.

            Indira Gandhi is an icon only for the loony right wing today in India (besides of course the equally loony Congress party). Like in her Emergency days, they want the constitution suspended, media muzzled and intellectuals jailed.

          • Rajat Datta

            Blah blah blah…….. Stupid musings of a mongrel.

          • Samrat Bharat

            Sigh. How much the Sanatan Dharma has degraded from the great debates that scholars of our past used to confidently invite others to.

            What? No more “well known facts” that your fellow retired uncles forwarded? With so much intellectual laziness, we deserve to have our asses probed by Colonists and slammed by Islamists (he he he.. get it? get it?).