Times Of India’s Tainted Reportage

The Times Of India edition today has published a news story in the name of objective reportage regarding the controversial remarks made by BJP leader and Minister of State for Food Processing Industries Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti.

On 1 December, the Sadhvi got involved in a bitter controversy when during an election campaign in Delhi, she asked the voters of Delhi to make a choice between ‘followers of Ram’ and ‘illicit people.’

The Minister since has apologized for the unfortunate remarks, but the opposition has been demanding her resignation and arrest, but one cannot help but notice the obvious ideological bias the TOI piece seems to harbor as can be understood from this extract:

The minister’s offensive remark is in a series of similar statements by Sangh hotheads that have made people wonder if they have the ruling dispensation’s tacit approval. The absence of any categorical condemnation of these remarks by the party brass has only reinforced the suspicion.

How the TOI can put the term “Sangh hotheads” in a report that appears in the headlines section is for them to explain. Then again the newspaper is famed for having eye-goggling statements to make it newsworthy from glossy advertisements to tasteless excerpts on actresses. And if one reads the aforementioned ‘report,’ it would seem the TOI is giving more off a judgmental sermon than a news report.

If one controversial remark can associate the Minister with the so-called Sangh hotheads what does TOI call the leaders of Congress who made such articulate statements in impeccably decent language:

1.      ‘I don’t understand whether the BJP is a political party or a party of dancers’Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh

2.      In 2009 Lok Sabha campaign rally, Congress leader Rizwan Usmani described Narendra Modi as Badtamiz- Uncouth , and asked for the identity of Modi’s parents.

3.      ‘Every day he repeats Dr. Manmohan Singh ….. Manmohan Singh………… Manubhai is sitting here …….Manubhai, the fact is that he is infected with rabies…. Manubhai, he has bitten by rabid dog…However Chief Minister, within your life what about your married life? Gujarat knows it. Why don’t you disclose it one day? And why it didn’t work out after marrying …’- Gujarat Congress President Arjun Modhwadia in his election rally speech in October 2012.

4.      ‘Ask the BJP to announce their candidate. They are always fighting like cats and dogs.’ – Congress leader the ever so suave Mani Shankar Aiyar.

5.      ‘I promise you in 21st Century Narendra Modi will never become the Prime Minister of the country. …But if he wants to distribute tea here, we will find a place for him.’- Again by the suave Aiyar.

Based on the aforementioned statements, shouldn’t TOI call these eminent leaders “Congressi Uncouths?” The TOI should know that a front-page ‘objective’ report is very different from biased editorials. And while it attacks the Sadhvi the TOI editorial team seemed to have forgotten this gem from one of their own:


  • Radha Rajan

    Nothing controversial about the Sadhvi’s speech. After all the same rascals who are baying for her blood for speaking her mind are passionate proponenets ofn what is called subaltern history and subaltern narrative. And Sadhvi, belonging ton the Nishad community is subaltern too isn’t she? So what, like Gandhi, these morons who are berating her for her rustic speech, think subalterns cannot have agency to speak for themselves but that only they should speak on behalf of the subalterns. Gandhi raged against a scheduled caste gentleman who asked Gandhi directly how many scheduled caste members were going to the Constituent Assemble. This subaltern Nishad lady is now my Minister and she spoke her mind as is typical of her. If Hindi film songs can use four letter English words and if the english-educated intellectual elite (?????) can use four letter words and other expletives at home and at work, why this houha about what Sadhvi Niranjan Jyothi said and how she said it? Because she is so obviously Hindu? That’s the bit sticking in their craw.

    • Ponderer

      Frankly, when Sadhvi used that particular word ‘haramz…’ she was actually bang on the target. If one goes by the behavior of the opposition and other motley crew, in the last few days, they have more or less done full justice to the word ‘haramz…’, they have not disappointed Sadhvi ji and her supporters (like me) at all.

      The sooner this bast#@dized breed of Congis, leftists, sickularists, etc gets exposed, LABELED, ostracized and dispatched to oblivion, the better for Bharatavarsha.