The Myth of the Hindu Right

In media accounts today, particularly in India, it seems that any group which identifies itself as Hindu or tries to promote any Hindu cause is quickly and uncritically defined as ‘right-winged’.

In the Marxist accounts that commonly come from the Indian press, Hindu organizations are routinely called fundamentalists, militants or even fascists. This may be surprising for the western mind, inclined to think of India as a Hindu country. But not only have states in India like Bengal and Kerala been long dominated by Marxists, most of academia and much of the English-language media has been as well. Their slanted views are often uncritically accepted by the western media as well.

However, if we look at their actual views, Hindu groups have a very different ideology and practices than the political right in other countries. In fact, most Hindu causes are more at home in the left in the West than in the right.

The idea of the ‘Hindu right’ is largely a ploy to discredit the Hindu movement as backward and prevent people from really examining it. The truth is that the Hindu movement is a revival of a native spiritual tradition that has nothing to do with the political right-wing of any western country. Its ideas are spiritually evolutionary, not politically regressive. Let us examine the different aspects of the Hindu movement and where they would fall in the political spectrum of left and right as usually defined in the West.

 Hinduism and Native Traditions

The Hindu cause is similar to the cause of native and tribal peoples all over the world, like native American and African groups. Even Hindu concerns about cultural encroachment by western religious and commercial interests mirrors those of other traditional peoples who want to preserve their cultures. Yet while the concerns of native peoples have been taken up by the left worldwide, the same concerns of Hindus are styled right-wing or communal, particularly by the left in India!

When native Americans ask for a return of their sacred sites, the left in America supports them. When Hindus ask for a similar return of their sacred sites, the left in India opposes them and brands them as intolerant for their actions! When native peoples in America or Africa protest missionaries for interfering with their culture, they are supported by the left. Yet when Hindus express the same sentiments, they are attacked by the left. Even the Hindu demand for rewriting the history of India to better express the value of their indigenous traditions is the same as what native Africans and Americans are asking for. Yet the left opposes this Hindu effort, while supporting African and American efforts of a similar nature.

In countries like America, native traditions are minorities and thereby afforded a special sympathy. Leftists in general tend to support minority causes and often lump together black African and native American causes as examples of the damage caused by racism and colonialism. In India, a native tradition has survived the colonial period but as the tradition of the majority of the people. Unfortunately, the intellectual elite of India, though following a leftist orientation, has no sympathy for the country’s own native tradition. They identify it as right-wing in order to express their hostility towards it. They portray it as a majority oppression of minorities, when it is the movement of a suppressed majority to regain its dignity.

Not surprisingly, the same leftists in India, who have long been allied to communist China, similarly style the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan cause as right-wing and regressive, though the Dalai Lama is honored by the American left. This should tell the reader about the meaning of right and left as political terms in India. When one looks at the Hindu movement as the assertion of a native tradition with a profound spiritual heritage, the whole perspective on it changes.


Hindu Economics

The Hindu movement in India in its most typical form follows a Swadeshi (own-country) movement like the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch. It emphasizes protecting the villages and local economies, building economic independence and self-reliance for the country. It resists corporate interference and challenges multinational interests, whether the bringing of fast food chains to India, western pharmaceuticals or terminator seeds.

Such an economic policy was supported by Mahatma Gandhi with his emphasis on the villages, reflected in his characteristic usage of the spinning wheel. Its counterparts in the West are the groups that protest the World Trade Organization (WTO), the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). However, these protest groups are generally classified as ‘left-wing’ by the international press.

The international press considers the economic right-wing to be the powers of the multinational corporations, particularly, the oil industry, which certainly are not the allies of Hindu economics. Clearly Hindu economics is more connected with the New Left in the West and has little in common with the right. The Republican right in America, with its corporate interests, would hardly take up the cause of Hindu economics either.


Hindu Ecology and Nature Concerns

Hindu groups are well known for promoting vegetarianism and animal rights, particularly the protection of cows. The Hindu religion as a whole honors the Divine in animals and recognizes that animals have a soul and will eventually achieve liberation. Hindu groups have tried to keep fast food franchises, which emphasize meat consumption, out of India. Such a movement would be part of consumer advocacy movements that are generally leftist or liberal causes in the West. Again it is hardly an agenda of the right-wing in America, which has a special connection to the beef industry; or to the right-wing worldwide, which has no real concern for animal rights and is certainly not interesting in spreading vegetarianism.

Hindus look upon nature as sacred, honoring the rivers and mountains as homes of deities. They stress the protection of Mother Earth, which they worship in the form of the cow. They have a natural affinity with the western ecology movement and efforts to protect animals, forests and wilderness areas. This is also hardly a right-wing agenda.

The idea of the ‘Hindu right’ is largely a ploy to discredit the Hindu movement as backward and prevent people from really examining it

Hindu Religious Pluralism

The Hindu religion is a pluralistic tradition that accepts many paths, teachers, scriptures and teachings. One cannot be a Christian without accepting Christ or a Buddhist without accepting Buddha, but one can be a Hindu without accepting any single figure. In fact there are Hindus who may not follow Krishna, Rama, Shiva, Vishnu or other Hindu sages or deities and still count as Hindu.

Hindus have been at the forefront in arguing for the cause of religious diversity and the acceptance of pluralism in religion, rejecting the idea that any single religion alone can be true.

This Hindu idea of religion—which is also subscribed to by so-called right wing Hindu groups like RSS—is obviously not part of the agenda of the religious right in the West. The American Christian right is still sending missionaries to the entire world in order to convert all people to Christianity, the only true religion. It is firmly fixed on one savior, one scripture and a rather literal interpretation of these. Yet when Hindus ask the pope to make a statement that truth can be found outside of any particular church or religion they are called right-wing and backwards, while the pope, who refuses to acknowledge the validity of Hindu, Buddhist or other Indic traditions, is regarded as liberal! Such pluralism in religious views is hardly a cause for any right-wing movement in the world, but is also considered progressive, liberal, if not leftist (except in India).


Hinduism and Science

Unlike the religious right in the West, the Hindu movement is not against science or opposed to teaching evolution in the schools. Hinduism does promote occult and spiritual subjects like astrology, Ayurvedic medicine, Yoga or Vedanta, but these are the same basic teachings found in the New Age in the West, generally regarded as a liberal or leftist movement, not those of the religious right in the West. Many leaders of the Hindu movement are in fact scientists. For example, RSS leaders like former chief Rajinder Singh, or BJP leaders like Murli Manohar Joshi have also been professors of modern physics. The Hindu movement sees the union of science and spirituality as the way forward for humanity, not a return to medieval views of the universe.


The Hindu Movement and Caste

The Hindu right is often defined in the media in terms of caste, as favoring the upper castes over the lower castes. This is another distortion that is often intentional. Modern Hindu teachers have been at the forefront of removing caste. This includes great figures like Vivekananda, Mahatma Gandhi and Aurobindo. It includes major Hindu movements like the Arya Samaj, the largest Vedic movement in modern India, and the Swadhyaya movement.

The Hindu movement can be an ally for any native causes, environmental concerns, women’s spiritual issues and movements toward economic simplicity and global responsibility, to mention but a few.

The VHP, the largest so-called Hindu right wing group, rejects caste and works to remove it from Hindu society, giving prominence to leaders from lower classes and working to open the Hindu priesthood to members of all castes. While caste continues to be a problem in certain segments of Hindu society, it is generally not because of these current Hindu social, religious and political movements, but because their reform efforts are resisted.

The real social problem in India is not simply caste but jati, which refers to family, clan, community and regional interests. Many so-called anti-caste movements in India, including those honored by the left (like movements of Laloo Prasad Yadav) actively promote the interests of one community in the country over those of the country as a whole.

india 1

The Hindu Movement and Women’s Rights

Generally, the right wing in the West is defined as opposed to women’s rights. However, there are many women’s groups and active women leaders in the Hindu movement and in the Hindu religion. Being a woman is no bar for being a political or religious leader in India as it often is in the West. Hinduism has the worlds’ largest and oldest tradition of the worship of the Divine as Mother, including as India itself. Great female Hindu gurus like Ammachi (Mata Amritanandamayi) travel and teach all over the world. The Hindu movement worships India on a spiritual level as a manifestation of the Divine Mother (Shakti).

women pujari

The Indian Left: The Old Left

In India, the political terminology of right and left is defined by Marxists, who like to call anyone that opposes them right-wing or fascists. According to their view anything traditionally Hindu would have to be right-wing on principle, just as only their views are deemed progressive, even if supporting Stalinist tactics. This means that in India such subjects as Yoga, natural healing, vegetarianism and animal rights are all automatically right-wing because they are causes of the Hindu mind, with antecedents in ancient Indian culture. Great Hindu yogis and sages from Shankaracharya to Sri Aurobindo are classified by modern Marxists as right-wing, if not fascist.

However, the Indian left is mainly the Old Left, emphasizing a failed communist ideology and state economic planning such as dominated Eastern Europe in the decades following World War II and took it nowhere. It wreaked the same havoc with the economy and educational systems of India and kept the country backward. Indian communists are among the few in the world that still proudly honor Stalin and Mao (while warning of the danger of Hindu fundamentalism)! Communist ruled Bengal still teaches the glory of the Russian revolution for all humanity, though Russia gave up communism ten years ago! The Old Left was itself intolerant, oppressive and dictatorial, sponsoring state terrorism and genocide wherever it came to power. Indian leftists have never rejected these policies and look back with nostalgia on the Soviet Union!

Modern Hindu teachers have been at the forefront of removing caste. This includes great figures like Vivekananda, Mahatma Gandhi and Aurobindo. It includes major Hindu movements like the Arya Samaj, the largest Vedic movement in modern India, and the Swadhyaya movement.

Therefore, we must remember that the leftist criticism of Hinduism coming from the Indian left is that of the old left. This old left in India does not take up many of the causes of the new left like ecology or native rights. It even sides with the policies of the political right-wing in western cultures upholding the rights of missionaries to convert native peoples and continuing colonial accounts of Indic civilization.

The communist inspired left in India has tried to demonize the Hindu movement as a right-wing phenomenon in order to discredit its spiritual orientation. The aim of the Indian left is to keep the Hindu movement isolated from any potential allies. After all, no one likes fascists, which is a good term of denigration that evokes negative emotions for both communists and capitalists.


Hinduism and the Left

The causes taken up by the Hindu movement are more at home in the New Left than in right wing parties of the West. Some of these resemble the concerns of the Green Party. The Hindu movement offers a long-standing tradition of environmental protection, economic simplicity, and protection of religious and cultural diversity. There is little in the so-called Hindu right that is shared by the religious or political right-wing in western countries, which reflect military, corporate and missionary concerns. The Hindu movement has much in common with the New Age movement in the West and its seeking of occult and spiritual knowledge, not with the right wing in the West, which rejects these things. Clearly, the western right would never embrace the Hindu movement as its ally.

To counter this distortion, some Hindus are now arguing for a new ‘Hindu Left’ to better express the concerns of Hindu Dharma in modern terms. They would see the new left as more in harmony with Hindu concerns and a possible ally. Hindu thought has always been progressive and evolutionary, seeking to aid in the unfoldment of consciousness in humanity and not resting content with material or political gains as sufficient. Hindu Dharma should be reexamined by the new left and the distortions of by the old left discarded. The new left will find much in Hindu Dharma that is relevant to its concerns.

The Hindu movement can be a great ally to many social movements throughout the world. It has a base of nearly a billion people and the world’s largest non-biblical religious tradition, with a long tradition of spiritual thought and practice. The Hindu movement can be an ally for any native causes, environmental concerns, women’s spiritual issues and movements toward economic simplicity and global responsibility, to mention but a few.

Groups espousing such causes may have looked upon Hinduism as an enemy, being taken in by leftist propaganda. They must question these distortions of the old left. They should look to the Hindu view for insight, even if they may not agree with it on all points. They should not trust the anti-Hindu stereotypes of the old left, any more than they trust the views of the now defunct Soviet Union.


Towards a Non-Political Social Order

However, the entire right-left division reflects the conditions of western politics and is inaccurate in the Indian context. We must give up such concepts in examining Indic civilization, which in its core is spiritually based, not politically driven. It reflects older and deeper concerns that precede and transcend the West’s outer vision. As long as we define ourselves through politics our social order will contain conflict and confusion. Democracy may be the more benign face of a political order, but it still hides the lack of any true spiritual order. We must employ the vision of dharma and subordinate politics to it, which should be a form of Karma Yoga.

(This was first published in Vedanta Today)


    Hindus look upon nature as sacred, honoring the rivers and mountains as homes of deities. They stress the protection of Mother Earth, which they worship in the form of the cow. They have a natural affinity with the western ecology movement and efforts to protect animals, forests and wilderness areas. This is also hardly a right-wing agenda.

    Absolute humbug ; other than the cow , the right-wing Hindus have nothing to do with the environment ; can anyone name any Hindu activist who has fought for the environment in India ?

  • Dr David Frawley

    Note that the article originally derives from a chapter in my book Hinduism and the Clash of Civilizations (Voice of India, 2001) and has been shared in various forums over the years. I would write it a little differently today, but would still hold to the main points involved.

  • Sama Narayanan

    Such an economic policy was supported by Mahatma Gandhi with his emphasis on the villages, reflected in his characteristic usage of the spinning wheel. Its counterparts in the West are the groups that protest the World Trade Organization (WTO), the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). However, these protest groups are generally classified as ‘left-wing’ by the international press.

  • m p

    Great article. In summary:-
    1) Indian Left, incl Nehruvian left, is against Hinduism because of vote-bank politiics and Hindus are an un-organized majority.
    2) Global left is against Hinduism because it is a blind comrade of Indian left.
    3) Global right is against Hinduism because of conversion agenda.

    #3 will never change it’s stripe.
    #2 might see the light.

  • Individualist

    Hinduism, its preachers consider themselves high elites. The hindu philosophy is similar to the discussion between smoked ppl. It all looks very fantastic but has no practical preference. Most common man don’t even know what does the philosophy means, but it sounds great.

    If the India follows the hinduism, there will be no “right”. RSS and BJP would never exists.

    • Nachiket Parashar

      Most common man of any religion does not know the philosophy of respective religion. Yes, Hinduism helps you to understand existence, if you want to, for self growth. It takes you along as you want to not what it wants you to follow. So take your path when u wish to. Atheist also part of existence and so also Hinduism. Hinduism is as much practical as materialistically as spiritually. It allows all humans to co-exist without hating each other as believer and non-believer, what more anyone wants for a peaceful society?

      • Peter Aremone

        Agreed, a lot of Atheists are Hindus & a lot of Hindus are Atheists & its in perfect harmony. That is something that racist, bigoted left wingers will refuse to see, it doesn’t fit in their hatred agenda.

        • Individualist

          No, I don’t like athesim.

      • Individualist

        Hinduism doesn’t help u understand the existence. In many cases it preaches nilhism.

        Also, the main story is ‘searching for truth’, which I find so ironic, as Hinduism says truth is relative.

        As I said earlier Hinduism as a philosophy, sounds great but lack the practicality.

        I’ll give u one example,

        Take the caste system,

        Philosophy is society would be divided according to birth. It sounds reasonable, but do u not think this will lead to division on birth basis? Sure it will, and philosophers in hinduism ignored that.

        Many philosophers of hinduism were sadhus, which used to smoke pipe and get high. They neither lived in society but preached what society should do. That’s why the gap increased between command man and ‘philosophers’.

        • Nachiket Parashar

          No religion helps you to know the existence, knowledge is your own, guidance can come from outside. Nihilism, not always, but also not negative as the term is sensed by most. It never tells you to stop enjoying whatever you do but keeps telling you where true happiness, flowering of human being rests.

          Hinduism never says truth as relative. The path towards the truth for each individual is relative to his unique identity. The truth, when it arrives, is same.

          Again it is not caste system but Varna, there is difference. Varnas exists whether you follow them or not, Hindus only acknowledged them. In any society, for example take current society, we have Shudras (all salaried employees), Vaishyas (all businessman & professionals), Kshatriyas (Military Establishments & Politicians) & Brahmanas (Enlightened beings, Scientists & Inventors). We have already taken our respective position in this system irrespective of what our Varna by birth is. We follow the protocols even in modern society between the different Varnas. Observe the respect, money, fame earned by different Varnas in our society. Yet we cry over old surnames. Even in modern society son follows footstep of father more so because of knowledge & expertise a son gets by watching father since childhood but he is also free to do something else for livelihood.

          What philosophers you are talking about would probably preach their vidya, could be tantra, to the society for enlightenment.

          Of course there will be cheats in society, it is upto each individual to not get cheated. In spiritualism even if your Guru is unfit for you you still can achieve your individual goal if you are a good shishya.

          What Hinduism teaches and is most beautiful is don’t cry victim, it will not benefit spiritually. Move on.

        • charan


          • Individualist

            Don’t quote others. It kills the argument. If Einstein was athetist, it doesn’t make athetism any better .

          • charan

            Accepted your criticism.But great minds like whom I have mentioned would have said those words only after an honest understanding of what they are saying? (BTW he said it in TIFR) And, sorry, Einstein is not a true intellectual.
            If Hinduism( I don`t like to call it as an ‘-ism’–Hindu Dharma) is only highly philosophical and not practical, it would have not been in existence (relatively peaceful) for almost 5000 years,and contributed
            A LOT to the humanity.(Even though we have enough scientific evidences for the antiquity of India-i.e Dharmic India, going up-to 10000 years,let us not go into an ‘ideological’ argument!!)
            In their book IN SEARCH OF CRADLE OF CIVILIZATION authors, who are also scientists Subash Kak et al. irrefutably mention these facts; we Indians do remember ‘BEING DIFFERENT’!!
            There must ‘something’ in this place ( i.e INDIA) that inspired(and is inspiring) the greatest minds and souls of this world like no ‘other place’. And ‘this place’ is undeniably rooted to the DHARMIC tree-yes, this is indeed ‘A BEAUTIFUL TREE’!!
            Thank You.

          • Individualist

            Tell me one big place which doesn’t have a golden past or which has not been eulogized by a big name.

            Arabia, China, western europe, Russia , Japanese peninsula, Africa. All have their golden past and rich history.

            Its not a criticism to hinduism, just a reminder for eulogisers. a place of Hinduism is also the one, which promoted sati, is a place for casteism, intolerant enough to consider more than half of the society as untouchable.

            Also, Einstein was not an intellectual. Really?

          • charan

            A person who has read true history(his-story) about EInstein can understand that he is not a true intellectual.I am saying this with all the due respects to Einstein and as a Physics student.(Refer C.K.Raju for this.)
            Every country(especially Asian) has a glorious past. But the past of India is to glorious to underestimate.
            Hindu Dharma(please, don`t call it an ‘-ism’) does not promote sati and ‘other’ such social evil.Period. (You may not like this, to quote, Rajiv Malhtora and S.Gurumurthy have spoken about this, in IIT`S) As a matter of fact, the number of deaths because of SATI, according to UN, is 3000(maximum). Remember the most ‘liberal’ estimates of deaths of women due to ‘burning’ in Europe is 100,000 according to ‘European’ ( pseudo-) historians.
            Finally, you HAVE to answer to my last question about ‘A BEAUTIFUL TREE’.
            Remember, a learned scholar once asked “Is there an Indian Way of thinking?”
            {As a rejoinder, you can read what David Mumford(A fields medallist, mathematician) has to say about India-–PassagesIndia-journal.pdf}

            Happy for your intellectual honesty and argumentative spirit (something that is rare today, you may know) and in that sense you are a ‘TRUE INDIAN’.

            Thank You.

          • charan

            It is––PassagesIndia-journal.pdf

          • Individualist

            again I hate it when ppl use quotes in the argument.

            All civilizations have their golden period, the golden period of one is not exactly the same for other. For example, if europe has a bloody history, it also has a history of ruling all the world. It also has all contemporary scientist and many philosophers.

            Dissociating sati/caste system from hindu dharma(I don’t see any problem with -ism either) is similar argument, liberals give to dissociate present day extremism with Islam. Its shallow and wrong.

            Finally yes, there is a India way of thinking and there is a chinease way of thinking and there is a arabic way of thinking. the ideal Arabic way of thinking and Indian way of thinking are very similar.

            Then again I reached to my first comment, the philosophy is so irrelavent to the common people that we can just talk about and give lectures but nothing practical.

          • charan

            An honest question-
            How many genuine(read GENUINE) works have you read about Indian history,Philosophy? How many Sanskrit works have you read,the original?With what authority are you asserting those statements?
            You din`t answer my question regarding ‘A BEAUTIFUL TREE’ -a question that we ‘modern Indians’ need to answer.What is that ‘something’ that is again and again inspiring ‘others'( and this includes scientists, poets, philosophers, spiritualists and others) to this Holy Land like no other country? And that land is undeniably rooted to DHARMIC TREE??
            Quoting does not mean defeat-it just means you are providing evidence,justification from authentic sources for your argument.Both the source and the person who quotes need to understand the material honestly, it is my job.You can check the original sources and argue, otherwise it just becomes an ideological argument- we have many pseudo-intellectuals to do that.
            For intellectual progress, we need to kill all the ‘-isms’ and in that sense it is indeed HINDU DHARMA.Period.
            It is only after humble research that any person should speak about what they are saying-listen to Gurumurthy`s lectures here ad a beginner–
            Be open minded, I am quoting again- please read this

            {You may not like ‘alternative opinions’ but that does not mean the truthful opinions are false}

          • Individualist

            Now I’m doubtful as u called for genuine sources, I don’t know which one are those.

            I don’t know sanskrit and I dont hv any authority over anything. My reading abt Hindu philosophy is not necessary here.

            Something that inspire philosophers, scientists etc to come to India is false statement according to statistics. Check the data. Migrations of artists, scientitist always depends on the prosperity of a country.

            When u quote someone’s opinion and I argue against that, it feels like I’m arguing against the person u have quoted. That will give u self righteous feeling, which u have shown in the previous comment, like see those ppl have said this and those are the GENUINE souces.

            Again using hinduism doesnt make someone pseudo intellectual, it is just a suffix. Stop arguing for a word.

  • Sekhars

    why not to see every thing in terms of Dharmic vs dharma ? Rather than calling it left or right. Left and Right would be good for western societies and for us it could be best defined as dharma vs adharma.

  • madhav

    Very good article with indepth analysis by the author.