Revisiting a Classic—The Calcutta Quran Petition: Book Review

Background The average educated person today, anywhere in the world, is likely to be both…


The average educated person today, anywhere in the world, is likely to be both confused and frightened by Islam. On the one hand, it is supposed to be a religion of peace that preaches equality and justice for all, while on the other, it is hardly possible to escape the sight of the most unspeakable acts of violence being committed by individuals and groups in its name.

To make the situation more confusing, there is no shortage of ‘experts’—Eastern and Western—who tell us that Islamic terror is an aberration that has nothing to do with the ‘true’ Islam.

It is fair to say that a majority of the people in the world has swallowed this explanation while remaining ambivalent about Muslims and their behavior.

Sita Ram Goel

In the book under review, Sita Ram Goel, one of the world’s most incisive students of Islam, blows away this confusion by giving an unvarnished, scholarly yet highly readable account of the theory and practice of Islam.

By a detailed analysis of its scripture and history, he explodes the charade that Islamic terror can somehow be separated from its teachings. In the process, the prolific and erudite Mr. Goel has probably written his masterpiece.

To return to the confused state of knowledge about Islam, there has long been a need – more urgent today than ever before – for a work that can explain the theory and practice of Islam for the average reader. This void is now effectively filled by the book under review – ‘The Calcutta Quran Petition’ by Sita Ram Goel.

Goel’s pluralistic Hindu background gives him a distinct advantage over his Western counterparts, who, despite their best efforts, cannot entirely break free of the shackles of their exclusivist Judeo-Christian heritage that springs from the same soil as Islam. Goel on the other hand looks at Islam as a complete outsider, disregarding its pious claims. If there is one book on Islam that a concerned person should read, it is his ‘The Calcutta Quran Petition’.

The book could with equal justice be titled ‘Islam for Nonbelievers: Its scripture, history and practice’. The reason for the unusual title is historical.

On 29 March 1985, one Chandmal Chopra filed a writ petition in the Calcutta High Court seeking a ban on the Quran under Sections 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code because it “incites violence, disturbs public tranquility, promotes, on the ground of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities, and insults other religions or religious beliefs of other religious communities of India.

The Calcutta High Court disallowed the petition, but the issues raised by it remain relevant, especially now when the need to understand the causes of terror in the name of Islam is greater than ever.

More significantly for the present discussion, it led Sita Ram Goel to write the volume under review. The sordid details of the case in question would probably be of little interest to the average reader today though they shed much light on the ignoble conduct of the Governments of India and West Bengal in the face of real or perceived Muslim threats.

Out of a total of 345 pages, the author devotes no less than 230 pages to a general discussion of Islam that has little directly to do with the Calcutta Petition. These pages, covering Chapters 2 through 10, constitute for all practical purposes an independent manual on Islam, beginning with the message of the Quran. This is what is reviewed here.

Quran and the Hadis

The first point about the Quran is that it does not stand alone. The Suras (verses) of the Quran were created in specific situations arising out of specific military, political and sometimes personal needs. They invariably reflect the convenience of the Prophet who found it expedient to invoke Allah as authority to have his own way with his people.

Seeing this, his favorite wife A’sha once observed, “I find that Allah is prompt to proclaim commandments in accordance with your desire.” This means that the context in which a Sura was created is all-important. Taking Quranic passages out of context can lead to outlandish interpretations like Sir Abdullah Suhrawardy’s sayings of Muhammad, which Mohandas Gandhi hailed in his Foreword as among the “treasures of mankind.”

The all-important context for interpreting the suras of the Quran is provided by the Hadis. They may be described as the record of the activities of the Prophet. They are so detailed that it is possible to obtain a more or less complete picture of the private and public life of the Prophet.

It may fairly be said that the Hadis rather than Quran form the basis for Islam, for without them the Quran becomes virtually incomprehensible. As Goel makes clear (Chapter 3) there is practically no difference between Allah and the Prophet; Allah does the Prophet’s bidding.

This made the great Maharshi Dayananda Saraswati observe, “Allah is the Prophet’s domestic servant.” As Goel explains, this makes the Quran (the ‘Word of Allah’) and the Hadis (‘Acts of Muhammad’) interchangeable.

In other words, the Hadis describe the Quran in action, meaning the acts of the Prophet. These in turn became the model of behaviour to be emulated for every true Muslim from the highest to the lowest. As Goel observes:

“It is this fixed and frozen image of the Prophet which is meant when a Muslim proclaims his Din (fundamental faith). In fact the Prophet produced a ‘revelation’ (33.21) presenting himself as the perfect model for those who look forward (with hope) for the Day of Judgement. For a pious Muslim, human life is best lived when it conforms to Muhammad’s conduct even in minor matters such as defecating… , cutting one’s beard to a specific size and so on. Islam leaves no room at all for individual initiative or judgment…

      In case of doubt, a pious Muslim must go to a mufti (jury-consultant) and obtain a fatwa [ruling] about how the Prophet would have conducted himself in a situation which, according to all sources, the Prophet is not known to have faced.”

Needless to say, this is not a climate conducive to progress.

This also has a sinister side with far-reaching implications. Since the later part of the Prophet’s career is full of war and bloodshed in the name of Allah, religious war or Jihad is seen as the highest goal of Islam.

What the world is faced today – from Kashmir to Kosovo (and now West Asia and Syria, pushing into Europe) – is Jihad or religious war to bring the whole world under the sway of Islam.

Walter Laquer

This reality cannot be wished away as is done by liberal academics in East and West, by giving an abstract interpretation of Jihad. As Walter Laquer, an American expert on terrorism observed,

“Many interpreters of jihad in the Muslim world, and an equal number in the West, have explained that jihad has a double meaning: it stands for jihad bi al saif (holy war by means of the sword) and also for jihad al nafs (literally, struggle for one’s soul against one’s own base instinct).

Both interpretations are true, but Islamic militants have rejected the spiritual explanation as dangerous heresy. …The Taliban in Afghanistan and many militants (especially ISIS today) are not impressed by the speeches and writings of more moderate exegetists about the ‘poverty of fanaticism’ and the ‘spiritual mission of Islam,’ and this fact is what matters…”

The fact of the matter is that influential Muslim leaders see the violent version of Jihad as the only valid one. Jihad to them is “the most glorious word in the vocabulary of Islam,” and by this they don’t mean striving for inner perfection.

Goel explains this vital fact with clarity and thoroughness with profuse illustrations from the history and scripture of Islam. As he points out, the Quran studied alongside the Hadis is a nothing but a manual on Jihad – or religious war. Just as the Prophet became the model for Muslim behavior, his blood soaked career became the model for a succession of Muslim leaders down to the present.

While the Hadis are indispensable for understanding Islam, they present a bewildering mass of detail to the uninitiated. In Chapter 4 (‘The Prophet Sets the Pattern’), the author takes the reader through the Prophet’s career by presenting a systematic picture of the historical background and the key events.

He describes also two interesting episodes that are not widely known: the Prophet’s invitation, in a time of distress, to the Christian Abyssinians to invade Mecca, claiming that his teachings were no different from theirs; and the famous ‘Satanic verses’ inspired by the need to regain the support of the Meccans.

In Chapter 5 (‘The Orthodox Exposition of Jihad’), the author produces evidence from primary sources to demolish the claim of modern apologists that Jihad has – or ever had – a spiritual meaning. This ‘spiritual’ interpretation is exhumed only when they feel insecure – as in India today, or when faced with powerful opponents like the United States – to be buried again when conditions turn favorable.

Chapter 6 (‘Jihad in India’s History’) may be read as a practical demonstration of Islam in action. It is to be hoped that every policymaker in India as well as the West will read this capsule account of the ‘bloodiest story in history’ – as Will Durant called it – and learn its lessons.

Indians in particular must face this historical truth and not seek escape in fantasies written by soothsayers calling themselves historians. This chapter should be made required reading for students in India, if mistakes of the past are not to be repeated.

In some ways, the most interesting as well original section is Chapter 10 (‘A Close Look at Allah of the Quran’). In this, Goel compares Allah of Prophet Muhammad with the Mongol sky god Tengiri who inspired Chengiz Khan on his world conquest.

Sita Ram Goel shows how from the Jaxartes (Syr Darya) in Central Asia to the Nile, the soldiers of Allah were no match for Tengiri’s Mongols. Baghdad along with its Caliph were reduced to dust literally under the hooves of the horses of Chengiz’s grandson Huelgu Khan and his ‘Devil’s Horsemen’. This fact though is rarely found in history books in use in India. (Tengiri had a redeeming feature though – he was tolerant of all religions.)

In summary, Sita Ram Goel has produced a manual on Islam that is a ‘must read’ for everyone concerned about the threat posed by Islamic terror in our time.

Dr. N.S. Rajaram is an Indian mathematician, notable for his publications on the Aryan Invasion debate, Indian history, and Christianity. Among his numerous books, the “The Dead Sea scrolls and the crisis of Christianity” is widely acclaimed.
  • shallu kalia

    Just read Sita Ram Goel’s Hindu society under siege on VOI site. The writing is addictive & once you start reading you cannot put down before finishing the complete book.For the first time in my life I realised that i am truly a Macaulaian hindu. I am wondering that why one of the greatest if not greatest hindu thinkers of 20th century is still not a well known name amongst educated hindus.


    What about the lynching of 3 ‘suspected’ cow smugglers by Hindus ? Can we label this Hindu terrorism ? What does Hinduism preach ? Are these not unspeakable acts of violence ?

    First look within before you castigate others.

    • Anuj Pratap Singh

      You sir are a chutiya. Was that Hindus who invaded Arab countries to enslave their women as sex slaves and kill their men? Was that Hindus who invaded Arab to break millions of masques? It was those bastards who invaded our country killed our forefathers and raped our foremothers, destroyed lakhs of wonderful temples, sacked universities and converted millions to a cult called islam.
      Hinduism doesn’t teach to kill or rape kafirs as Quran does.
      Ignorant like you are curse to our civilization.

  • Ahmed

    1. if Islam is so violent why has it surviced 1400 years?
    2. if Islam is so violent, why on earth Arabs Muslim were not defeated right at first attempt
    3. how come Indonesia became the largest muslim populated country when no muslim invading armies cane there.
    4. Afghans and all the istans are so brave and valorous, how come they did not thwart invading Muslim Arab armies
    5. Indians were able to kick out the British in 90 years (1857 – 1947), why have they not been able to kick out islam for almost 800 years. and You had last 50+ years under total Hindu control. I think Muslim made India excel in space/technology – Dr. kalam, etc
    6. who was responsible for WW1, WW2, six million Jews, 12 million Russains, and million all over the world being killed through out centuries. Islam came only 1400 years ago.
    so do not blame Islam for the ills of humanity. Yes, Islam is not easy to follow and yes main tenant is Jihad. and the biggest Jihad is Jihad bin nafs.

    • 2. Rajputs and Chalukya Dynasty defeated Arabs and Turks but the mistake Prithviraj Chauhan made by forgiving his enemy is what cost India dearly. Rajputs were mostly never united after Bappa Rawal while muslims were always united when their rulers called for jihad. even then many states of India and also the country of Nepal never came under islamic rule.

      3. Indonesia story is related to India because it was kind of Indian colony and Indians used to trade with them. after Western Gujarat Region was islamized many traders became muslims and this opened up the trade routes to SE Asia for arabs.

      4. Afghans adopted khan name after they were raped by Mongols.

      6. WW1 and WW2 are irrelevant to this discussion because they were not religious war.

      Point 1 and 5 are baseless.
      1. Christianity was also violent but it was reformed and Church lost most of its control over state during the Age of Enlightenment.

      5. British just packed their bags and left India after WW2 instead of suffering more causalities at the hands of trained Indian navy/army who were showing signs of revolt.

      • Ahmed

        When are you getting married? AppleSamsung is not going to be happy marriage. Apple is pure, Samsung is ….I cannot use desi/Punjabi here.

        if you are in Bay area, we can chat over cup of chai/biscuit and see if we can blame Islam for all the ills of humanity.
        1. why is it baseless. it is to be studied well by the Hindus and anyone not Muslim and even by muslims. best is that Indians should study it as they have brain and intellectuals and may be come up with a mathematical theory.
        2.How did the same Mongols who pillaged Islamic territories and killed almost everyone, that the horses hooves were soaked with blood, that same nation reverted to islam in less than fifty years and gave the world the Turks, etc. I am not historian but Turks have some links with Mongols/Tatars.
        3. so the Hindus in India resisted muslim invasion, but the Indonesians sat idle, why? they had warrior blood as well, they did fight ferociously against the Dutch, Why Not muslims.
        4. everyone when united never falls/surrender no matter how weak they are. that is why you see now muslim are under seige now because they are not united. even in India, they are divided over Barelvis, Doebandis, shia, sunni, kababi, wahabi/etc. which is why the like of RSS/Shiv Sena and other take advantage of this division.
        6 .you say WW1/WW2 were not religious wars then why do you associate a muslim action with his/her religion. why can’t you just say that Muslim are also greedy and worldly and that is why muslim invaded india for its Somnath Mandir. religion or no religion, it does play and is well played by sarkars/politicians in all age and time.
        so all I am saying is stop blaming Islam for the ills of the humanity.

        • better you keep your rants here about islam instead of concerning about my ID
          2. turks relation to Mongols is the same as afghan. Mongols never killed their subjects just because they followed a different religion. Timur killed 100000 Indian civilians on a single day just because of their religion.

          3. arabs along with converted muslim traders from India provided incentives to the Indonesian king if they converted to islam. So some kings readily converted to islam and many of his subjects too followed next. just because a ruler was a muslim, it cannot be assumed that the process of Islamisation of that area was still complete; rather the process was, and remains to this day, a continuous process in Indonesia. After conversion many religious battles were fought, a clear turning point occurred when the Hindu empire Majapahit in Java fell to the Islamised Demak Sultanate.In 1527, the Muslim ruler renamed newly conquered Sunda Kelapa as Jayakarta which was eventually contracted to Jakarta. This is how islam spread to Indonesia.
          In some parts of the Indonesian islands, towns emerged as a result of foreign Muslim traders settling there. In other parts Islam never became the majority-religion, probably due to the distance from the important trade routes (such as eastern Indonesia). In parts where there was a strong presence of animism or Hindu-Buddhist culture, Islam met profound cultural barriers (such as on the island of Bali which is still dominated by Hindu culture today) or it became blended with the per-existing belief-systems (examples of which can still be found in Central Java).

          All I am saying is keep your islam anywhere except India where it is meant to be and praise muhammad, practice sharia and suicide bomb each other to jannah while shouting allah akbar.
          India does not want any of it.

          • Ahmed

            rant is yours to keep. There is more Islam and Muslim population in non-Arab countries than Arab countries so forget about keeping Islam limited to Arab lands. India itself has some 200 million Muslims. Day dreaming is good for you.

          • Should I post your comments to make you realize who is the ranter here?

          • your holy book quran is actually a hate propaganda against Kuffars(Indians) and asks muslims to not make friends with Kuffars then explain why should Kuffars befriend and accept muslims? why should Kuffars respect your holy book and your prophet?

            here are the verses from terrorist manual quran.
            your quran calls kuffars as the vilest of animals.

            Surely the vilest of animals in Allah’s sight are those who disbelieve. (8.55)

            Quran: 8:55
            إِنَّ شَرَّ الدَّوَابِّ عِندَ اللّهِ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ فَهُمْ لاَ يُؤْمِنُونَ
            Inna sharra alddawabbi AAinda Allahi allatheena kafaroo fahum la yuminoona

            Muhammad Asad

            (Asad) Verily, the vilest creatures in the sight of God are those who
            are bent on denying the truth and therefore do not believe.
            Asad (8,58)

            They desire to deceive Allah and those who believe, and they deceive only themselves and they do not perceive.

            There is a disease in their hearts, so Allah added to their disease and they shall have a painful chastisement because they
            Qur’an 2:9-10

            your holy book quran along with other islamic texts are very clear in teaching that there is no equality between muslims
            and non-muslims, and hence no basis for a relationship of peers. allah through Prophet muhammad describes unbelievers as “perverted transgressors”, the “worst of creatures”,[ “unloved by allah”, and destined for eternal torture in Hell. Thus, by the quran’s most literal interpretation, there is little sense in befriending these “creatures” of such inferiority.

            YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for
            your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each
            other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them.
            Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust.

            PICKTHAL: O ye who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for
            friends. They are friends one to another. He among you who taketh them for
            friends is (one) of them. Lo! Allah guideth not wrongdoing folk.

            SHAKIR: O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians
            for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst
            you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely
            Allah does not guide the unjust people.

            YUSUFALI: Thou seest many of them turning in friendship to the
            Unbelievers. Evil indeed are (the works) which their souls have sent
            forward before them (with the result), that Allah’s wrath is on them, and in
            torment will they abide.

            PICKTHAL: Thou seest many of them making friends with those who
            disbelieve. Surely ill for them is that which they themselves send on
            before them: that Allah will be wroth with them and in the doom they will

            SHAKIR: You will see many of them befriending those who disbelieve;
            certainly evil is that which their souls have sent before
            for them, that Allah became displeased with them and in chastisement
            shall they abide.

            YUSUFALI: Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers
            rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from
            Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them.
            But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah.

            PICKTHAL: Let not the believers take disbelievers for their friends in
            preference to believers. Whoso doeth that hath no connection with Allah
            unless (it be) that ye but guard yourselves against them, taking (as it
            were) security. Allah biddeth you beware (only) of Himself. Unto Allah is
            the journeying.

            SHAKIR: Let not the believers take the unbelievers for friends rather
            than believers; and whoever does this, he shall have nothing of
            (the guardianship of) Allah, but you should guard yourselves
            against them, guarding carefully; and Allah makes you cautious
            of (retribution from) Himself; and to Allah is the eventual


            YUSUFALI: O ye who believe! Take not into your intimacy those outside
            your ranks: They will not fail to corrupt you. They only desire your ruin:
            Rank hatred has already appeared from their mouths: What their hearts
            conceal is far worse. We have made plain to you the Signs, if ye have

            PICKTHAL: O ye who believe! Take not for intimates others than your own
            folk, who would spare no pains to ruin you; they love to hamper you. Hatred
            is revealed by (the utterance of) their mouths, but that which their
            breasts hide is greater. We have made plain for you the revelations if ye
            will understand.

            SHAKIR: O you who believe! do not take for intimate friends from
            among others than your own people; they do not fall short of
            inflicting loss upon you; they love what distresses you; vehement
            hatred has already appeared from out of their mouths, and what
            their breasts conceal is greater still; indeed, We have made the
            communications clear to you, if you will understand.

            Book 001, Number 0417:

            ‘Amr b. ‘As reported: I heard it from the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) quite audibly and not secretly: Behold! the future generation of my fathers, that is, so and so, are not my friends. Verily Allah and the pious believers are my friends.

            Book 41, Number 4815:

            Narrated AbuHurayrah:

            The Prophet said: A man follows the religion of his friend; so each one should consider whom he makes his friend.

          • Ahmed

            good to know you are studying Quran. One day you will be enlightened if you read it with open heart.

          • Rajalakshmi J


            NEVER fall for such invitations to “cup of chai & biscuits” at all.

            Their motives are very sinister.

  • Ahmed

    Wonder if Islam is so bad how come it survived 1400 years. Indians got rid of British in 90 years (1857 to 1947), why haven’t they succeeded in getting rid of islam. Instead produced Allama iqbal whose poetry is quran in human language and yes does call for all sort of Jihad. Donot blame world geopolitical problems to Islam.

  • Rajalakshmi J

    Let us consider the galling double standards of indian secularists , the shameless appeasers.
    In Islamic countries including so called modern ones ( like UAE , Kuwait etc ) they are absolutely strict in ensuring all non muslims abide by their Islamic rules.

    When any non muslim takes the name of their Prophet (PBUH) has to necessarily write PBUH. If not , nothing short of death awaits that person. Any muslim can KILL ( not necessarliy the government machinery) & this is accepted by all. India’s monumental idiot appeaser mk.gandhi himself approved of such double standards. The so called “moderates” who I prefer to call thisisnotislamists are very clever. They wring their hands posturing to feel sympathetic like dhritharashtran with his “ye kya hora ha hai”.

    Whereas in Tamil Nadu & all over India any sleazeball can spout any amount of blasphemous statements on our Lord Sri.Rama , our entire Pantheon of Goddesses & Gods & the people not only enjoy but also elect such sleazeballs to power.

    dmk , its ally congress , the communists , farookh abdullah , his son omar abdullah , prannoy roys , bollykolly THUGS including kamalhassans a RENEGADE tambram (whose worshippers constitute mostly renegade tambrams. manirathnam , deceased writer IITian sujatha , crazy mohan , certain Tamil lecturers all suck up to him) all are anti Vedic . This gets tolerated in the guise of “secularism”. It is the same kollybollywood THUGS who have long been shooting their movies that are but torrid porn INSIDE Hindus’ Temples. It is congress , its ally dmk ( dmk controls kollywood film industry) , communists & the people in overwhelming numbers who ALLOW such unpardonable violations. Hindus are pathetic wimps pleading like craven beggars ” why can’t dmk eat at least one modak with us during our Vinayaka Chaturthi…why is he always having Iftar parties with muslims wearing the same attire ..the skullcap…boooohoooo. “.

    Pakistan does not decide our policies. Pakistan is not involved in film shootings also. It is indians themselves who are the main culprits. And they go & plead before arrogant shitheads called barkha dutts , sagarika ghoses , vikram chandras etc etc. Whatever barkha dutts , brinda karats , seema mustafas , teesta setalvads fart is gospel for bbc , its yalda hakims , mishal hussains , American leftist media.

    Hence I strongly suggest Sri.Narendra Modi , RSS , VHP enter into a deal with Dawood Ibrahim himself. That he should eliminate all of these putrefying scum infesting Bharath . Pakistan would not be in awe of amir khans, rajkapoor dynasty , saif ali khans,manirathnams , shah rukh khans , kamalhassans , dmk , dk atheists , various appeasers etc etc I suppose.

    • Absolutely Wrong when making a deal with devil and if this fails they will be termed as traitors.

      • Rajalakshmi J

        I said this as Hindus so far have not done anything save talking & talking with virulent adversaries like sagarika ghoses & barkha dutts. They are looking elsewhere at China I guess, when the enemies are WITHIN.

        Also you have no idea how dangerous people of Tamil Nadu are. dmk knows the idiocy of masses . Hence doing some hurried Temple visits. This posturing alone suffices for the masses to bring them back to power.
        Which is highly detrimental to Hindus like us. dmk , dk , congress are not just muslim appeasers but supporters of christian MAFIA. It is they who have been LOOTING Hindus Temples. kerala politicians , congressis , dmk , kashmiri politicians ( I read mufti md sayeed’s pdp party has started levying taxes on Hindus entering Vaishno Devi Temple in Kashmir) all have long PLUNDERED our Temples . They also support & abet Cow slaughter & their smuggling. kollywood kamalhassan , rishi kapoor of bollywood , shobhaa de – ALL eat BEEF. I read Article 22 of Indian Constitution PROHIBITS Cow slaughter unequivocally.

        Muslims & christians of India selectively cite indian constitution where they stand to benefit ( Haj subsidies , right to convert & propagate etc) & REJECT outright wherever they stand to NOT benefit. Both have tasted Hindus’ BLOOD . And have been pampered all these years. They are not going to give up. Would only PRETEND with fake smiles , happy diwali cries , sweets eating as they KNOW hindus are suckers.

        • your suggestion would actually be the last straw since there are many internal traitors who would divulge details in public sabotaging the operation. Never forget the American CIA/NSA spy networks run deep in this country.

          • Rajalakshmi J

            I guess you are right .However I would not mourn AT ALL should all the scum mentioned by me perish. I would be extremely gratified.

            Call it CIA / NSA who would like these bollykolly scum , media sluts , various politicians of india ? They are pragmatic enough to understand . My wish can come true.

  • Rajalakshmi J

    I have always been an ardent admirer of Sri.NS.Rajaram’s writings. Totally agree with what he has written .

    Hindus’ Vedas termed loosely Hinduism / Hindutva is ABSOLUTELY different. Hence it is alarming when various sophists among hindus keep conning us both are different ways of reaching God. There are many persuasive speakers in Tamil Nadu calling themselves ” ஆன்மிக பேச்சாளர்கள் ” who keep lulling Hindus into further idiotic somnolence , pushing us into the very abyss of darkest ignorant somnolence by coming up with some feel good stories that make me go arrrgh.
    They have themselves donned the mantle of peace brokers between Hinduism & other INIMICAL creeds- notably Christianity & Islam.

    It is ONLY in Hindus ‘ Vedas & various Spiritual Puranas , Ithihasas ( all are but Amplifications of Truths enshrined in Vedas) that we come across many Seekers who are perturbed profoundly by the ephemeral nature of everything in this world…..& thus ask meaningful questions. Our Lord Sri.Ram comes up with such magnificently UNPARALLELED summing up of this entire charade called life & world at a very young age . There is NO equal to our Sri.Rama(r). Period.

    When Hindus are already self sufficient where is the need to even look at other creeds leave alone embracing them?
    All of us know God is OMNIPRESENT. The nearest example one can give is Akasam / Space..Can Space ever take a walk?
    So it is highly ludicrous to keep repeating ” different paths of reaching” God.

  • I’d like to expound on this article.

    Many Indians accepted Purdah system under muslim rule(I suppose Rajasthan being the only exception) and so too, out of fear of protecting their girl child from muslims rulers , Indian kings along with other minor chiefs of their time adopted many wrong practices under muslim pressure.

    1. life story of Maharana Pratap who tried to stop marriages between Rajputs who gave there daughters to Mughals.
    2. jodha akbar where jodha was daughter of a rajput.
    3. During Partition, many Indians killed their own wives and daughters to protect them from gangrapes when the muslims asked them to leave their woman behind. Some Indian women even committed suicide by jumping into nearby wells but as they became full, they chose to die at their father’s or husband’s hand.(Honor killings)

    The acts of Sati and Jauhar may have actually helped Indians psychologically during hardships. if this particular statement comes off as male chauvinist then I am sorry.

    These Indians who still practice this female purdah system today or commit female foeticide are referred to as dhimmis(by me, who else) who were subjected to dhimmitude under muslim rule.

    Due to their inability to protect their girl child, Indians rulers in North India started killing them by drowning them in milk as soon as they were born (Honor killings). As the practice became rigid over time it turned into detest for female child. Add the dowry system of India which made this even worse like adding fuel to fire.

    purdah system and covering of woman’s face translates to ac!d attacks and also after Independence, female foeticide, a culmination of 2 factors which are detest for female child(indoctrinated through centuries) and prevalent dowry system.

    This was the evolution of that very same dhimmitude.

    Violent form of this dhimmitude: Honor-killings, acid-attacks and gangrapes.

    Dhimmitude: A psychological problem which becomes ingrained due to prevalent culture and indoctrination by living amongst dhimmis and muslims.
    while some dhimmis become very sympathetic to muslim cause and relate to them (Stockholm Syndrome).
    some convert and some subvert like communists of India.
    Indian communists are lost cause.

    Effect of this dhimmitude on Indian psyche:

    1. dhimmitude makes India lag behind China In IQ.

    2. This is the very reason India has now turned into ‘suicide state’ and Indians migrating to western countries to lead a better life.


    The only solution here is

    1.ex3cution(follow China model for most number of ex3cutions) of criminals who commit any heinous crimes like [email protected]@p3sand ac!dattacks to instill f3ar of law in likely off3nders

    2. Separate fast-track courts when dealing with such h3inous crimes

    3. Ban p0rninBIMARU states

    Half of the problem would have got solved during Independence.But it wasfu çk3dby a dhimmi anti-Hindu [email protected] non-elected leader.

    Now this problem can only get solved if

    1. there is strong, assertive law&order without any political interference.

    2. Cyber Cell monitors internet of their respective cities forch!ldp0rn and raid the suspects.

    3. NSA keeps regular tabs on likely, repeated and convicted s3xoffenders

    This will make sure the dhimmis start fearing the law.

    As the economy of the country improves, femalefoeticide eventually will also stop due to education and financial situation will enhance the lives and thinking in many states and citizens will start respecting the law. criminals will start fearing the law.

    India would not be in this state today had it not been for s!ckularization.

    Also Through education which nurtures civilized behavior.
    Dhimmis should give up all the malpractices they accepted under islamic invasion and
    Become Real fullblooded Indians with non-colonized, free-thinking minds.

    *I wanted to add more to this but I think I’ll end here for now*

  • Dharma Youdha

    Actually it doesn’t matter anymore. Islam may have originally meant to do good. Maybe the Prophet was indeed a saint and knew a lot about spirituality and wanted to do good. Maybe these terrorists are just misinterpreting him. Who knows ?? Allah jane !!! But what we do know is that what Islam is doing to the world. What we do know is what kind of barbarism is carried out in the name of Islam. Remember the case of Buddhism. Even though Buddha taught some of the highest methods of God realization and of detachment , Buddhism in the end ,ended up becoming the most intolerant faith of that time.It was doing more evil than good. So it had to be removed. Adi Shankaracharya did it. Same has to be done with Islam.!!! But in their case they only understand the language of bullets !!!

    • are you reading captchewtiyakayi blogs that you are sympathetic to muslim cause and still thinking that muhammad was a saint even when proof is right in front staring at your face.
      Buddha never cared about God and he never believed in Atman. He was an atheist/agnostic.


      • Dharma Youdha

        I recommend you read Swami Vivekananda’s works and views on Buddhism. Like his speech, Buddhism the fulfillment of Hinduism.


        • Then I’d say he didnt know anything about Buddhism. Buddha should not be worshiped nor is he an avatar of Vishnu.

          He did not give anything new to Hinduism but only regurgitated the same facts already known to Indians.

          -“Shakya Muni himself was a monk, and it was his glory that he had the large-heartedness to bring out the truths from the hidden Vedas and throw them broadcast all over the world.”

          Actually he rejected the authority of Vedas hence were categorized as nastiks.

          “Hinduism cannot live without Buddhism, nor Buddhism without Hinduism.”

          No. Hinduism does not care for Buddhism but agree that buddhism is nothing without Hinduism.

          -“Shakya Muni came not to destroy, but he was the fulfilment, the logical conclusion, the logical development of the religion of the Hindus.”

          So hindus should become Buddhist and start following Buddha’s teaching? Again NO. Buddhism was against Hinduism.

          -“At the time Buddha was born, India was in need of a great spiritual leader, a prophet.”
          this stuff about Buddhism is all wrong. I dont think Swami Vivekananda actually understood what Buddhism propagated. It is an totally nihilistic philosophy at higher levels.

          I’ll tell you that IMHO that Buddhism has harmed India more it started with Asoka the Buddhist.

          • Dharma Youdha

            Well now, you should really read about Vivekananda before you go on saying he didn’t know anything about Hinduism or Buddhism.
            All people like Veer Savarkar, Golwarkar guruji , Sri Aurobindo, even Dr Koneraad Elst hold him in very high regards.

            This one is a very long lecture, but it totally explains why Buddhism rose in India , how it benefited our Dharma , how it slowly degenerated and why it was removed

            Do read this when you get time
            Here’s one of his quotes
            Swami Vivekanada says :-
            Thus, inspite of preaching mercy to animals, inspite of the sublime ethical religion, inspite of the discussions about the existence or non-existence of a permanent soul, the whole building of Buddhism tumbled down piece-meal and the ruin was simply hideous. The most hideous ceremonies, the most obscene books that human hands ever wrote or the human brain ever conceived, have all been the creation of the degraded Buddhism. The Tartars and the Baluchis and all the hideous races of mankind that came to India, became Buddhists and assimilated with us, brought their national customs and the whole of our national life became a huge page of the most horrible, bestial customs. Sankara came and showed that the real essence of Buddhism and that of Vedanta are not very different but that the disciples did not understand the master and have degraded themselves, denied the existence of soul and one God and have become atheists. That was what Sankara showed and all the Buddhists began to come back to their old religion

          • I actually read what you shared and I, too, hold Swami Vivekananda in high regards. But his perspective on Buddhism is not what I’d subscribe to.

          • Dharma Youdha

            True !! What we need now is a Kshatriya mindset. Like N.S Rajaram writes !!

          • Can you specifically points towards these points I have highlighted below as described by Swami Vivekananda?
            “The most hideous ceremonies, the most obscene books that human hands ever wrote or the human brain ever conceived, have all been the creation of the degraded Buddhism. The Tartars and the Baluchis and all the hideous races of mankind that came to India, became Buddhists and assimilated with us, brought their national customs and the whole of our national life became a huge page of the most horrible, bestial customs”

          • Dharma Youdha

            Do you want me to name the obscene books that he was referring to ???????
            Well I don’nt know. I am no scholar of History

          • Are you from RSS? RSS has a deep fault in their stance.

          • Dharma Youdha

            Well I am not regular you see. I am still in college. I go to the shakha once a month. And I try to attend its functions if they are near me and if I have time .
            So what is the fault you are talking about ?

          • thinking purdah system is Indian.
            promoting vegan diet
            and moral policing woman.

            This makes them lose many votes.

          • Dharma Youdha

            Moral Policing Women ?? I never heard of it

          • there are many instances that VHP indulges in.

          • Dharma Youdha

            You see the VHP is only a part of the parivar and not RSS itself. And I myself don’t agree with the VHP. Unlike RSS they are not disciplined.
            But you won’t find any RSS members doing this

          • They can use modern means So people get to know the facts.

          • Dharma Youdha

            I don’t agree with the whole love jihad matter all together. Its creating a wrong impression. Though it is a grave problem this is not going to solve it.
            That’s why RSS stays away from the matter. It also stays away from Ghar Wapsi and all. VHP is doing it.

          • Dharma Youdha

            We have to focus on more important issues. We must go to the core of all these problems. So the RSS doesn’t go on criticizing others like Muslims and Christians for all our problems. The muslims and others share only 50% responsibility for the problems. The other 50% blame is on us, Hindus. You see the real enemy is not them, but people from our own society who for small personal gains have been demonizing our culture. Thats the way of the RSS. As former sarasanghchalak K.S sudarshan said that the approach of the RSS is “Draw an Even Bigger line approach “

          • Also many RSS members comment on various news websites but none defend when Hinduism and Indian Gods and Kings are abused or someone concoct false stories about them and publish nonsense articles on some left leaning websites. I on many occasions had to present them with facts and refute the baseless arguments from Hindu-haters.

          • Dharma Youdha

            Whats wrong with promoting vegetarianism ??

          • It is not Hinduism.

          • Jishnu

            Not quite, its just a manipulation of public discourse. There are threatened areas where people do understand the need of any practice and there are areas where they not asked for. The liberal play involves playing your words against a wrong audience thus trying to defrauding general public about the meaning, purpose and context. The manipulation of public opinion is a different game and has nothing really to do with what the liberals call moral policing – something they themselves do to deny any legitimate public voice to “Hindu right”.

          • Thanks for this new insight.

          • Rajalakshmi J

            In truth , Kaanchi MaHaPeriyavar & Svami Vivekananda have unmasked the grotesque hypocrites called ‘buddhists’.

            I remember Priyadarshi Dutta had extensively quoted Svami Vivekanada in niticentral where Svamiji Himself describes them “indolent , violent pseudo renunciates gorging on meat , drinking alcohol surreptitiously ……etc etc.

            Sri.Aadhi Ssankarar has scintillatingly ripped apart the flawed doctrine called buddhism in BrihadhAraNyaka Upanishad.

            I can write more but only in Tamil . But this much would suffice for someone like you I am sure.

            China is absolutely spot on as time & again China repeats ” buddhist monks are highly VIOLENT”.

      • Dharma Youdha

        “I am sympathetic to Muslim cause”, hahaaa, see my display pic bro !! Its a bhagwa dhwaj !!

  • Prasad

    Many thanks to Mr.Rajaram. A real eye opener.

  • slayer98

    Muslims in respective States in India with their familiarity over vernacular languages sedated the Musilims and non-Muslims with the pill that speaks ‘Islam is religion of peace’. Many people even Muslims do not know Arabic verses of Quaran and Hadith which is the topic in the above article simply get washed away by the sugar coated propaganda. Time to awaken the masses about the true face of Islam.