The story goes that the terms Right wing (RW) & Left wing (LW) were first used in the French Parliament soon after the bloody revolution. The right-wingers were cultured, mostly rich and more importantly, didn’t stink whereas the Left-wingers were the exact opposite. Hence both these groups sat separately on either sides of the center and addressed each other in the direction they sat to each other. So this seemingly innocuous addressing ritual has today become very potent with political meanings, policies and discourses.

The concept of these two opposing views is entirely Western. To simplify matters, each side considers the other to be evil and as the cause of misfortune in society. Both have well-set propaganda mechanisms in place to promote their own ‘superior’ outlook on various issues and also to slander the opponent’s view. This binary divide has been so ingrained into the psyche of the people and the culture, as a result of constant hammering, that an individual can only either belong to the one side or the other. There are some exceptions of course, with some in the center too, but they are few and far between. It is a very polarized society in which the rift is only getting wider with each day passing.

These two diametric views do not represent a homogenous mix of people with beliefs. Instead they contain several groups, divisions, and ideologies within them. Liberals, Communists, Socialists, Democrats in the US and the Labour Party in the U.K. Hippies, feminists, environmentalists and several more groups belong to the Left. There is a considerable population of Christians in some countries who count themselves in this category. They identify themselves as Christian Socialistic liberals, mostly. The Right contains the majority of Christians, the superrich (at least most of them), corporations, Republicans in the U.S, the NRA, the Conservative party of U.K, all conservatives (fiscal & Social) in general and so on.

The Left is of the opinion that the right-wingers are crazy, fascists whereas the Right thinks that the Left is all Communists, and Pussies. The left prides itself as the liberator of the common man from the clutches of the oppressing Right and the Right thinks that there is no oppression: it’s just that some are rich and the others haven’t worked hard enough. And then there are the religious conservatives who think that they are under obligation to the Almighty to preach and proselytize in any way they can, throughout the world. There are also people to the extremes in both sides called, the so-called Extreme Left and Extreme Right. They tend to be more physically violent.

The West has been very successful in categorizing the whole world within these two categories. Be it a Democratic society, which includes several of its own nations, or dictatorships around the World, it has propagated a discourse labeling each society, its ruler(s), its civilization with either of these positions. It is accurate to say that the Western society primarily looks at any other culture alien to it through this lens. And since this narrative is forced upon the rest of the World, through either its hard power or its soft power or a combination of both, this lens and the resulting perceptions (aberrations) have incredibly altered the psychology, morale and self-perception (or identity) of the locales on whom it is imposed.

Now, let us turn to our own backyard, India. India’s civilization, which is one of the oldest and still surviving, has a very different outlook on life. Its philosophies and priorities are different from the West and so are its methods to approach life. Our civilization is Dharmic, based on the Dharma. Yes, it includes even the people of Abrahamic faiths. I personally know Muslims and Christians who, contrary to their own religious teachings, believe in Dharmic concepts like Karma, rebirth etc. It’s a peculiarity of only this civilization. The word Dharma is non-translatable. One can only vaguely approach its meaning using terms in non-Indic langauges which invariably fail to capture its core essence and its all-encompassing application.

It’s a certain Indian experience that makes Dharma unique. Though our civilization encompasses several sects, schools and cultures inside it, they all conform to a common outlook and identity dictated by the values prescribed by Dharma. Be it the Vedic religions, Buddhism, or the Adivasi cultures in the villages, there is a common thread that runs throughout this civilization, that lets us treat others with mutual respect and look at ourselves with contentment. Fortunately or unfortunately it is Dharma that we use as the lens to look at the World.

Does our civilization offer an opposition to Dharma making it bipolar like the West? It does, but not in the same sense though. There is Adharma, which simply means ‘that which is not Dharma’. So for example, if Dharma says something as basic as, ‘respect your parents’, Adharma is simply not doing   so. And there are certain things specifically classified as Adharma by definition. There have been times in our civilization when Adharma has flourished with the help of certain rulers and ideologies, but there never was a time when Dharma didn’t oppose it and fight against it.

Furthermore, the dichotomy between Dharma and Adharma is not borne of out of social status or how people smelled, like that of the West, but by the very nature of Man and his/her aspirations. Neither can it be compared to that of the Christian view of God (or Good) Vs Evil because Dharma has nothing to do with religion and certainly not with an imaginary personification of people’s fear and dark desires.

It is this Dharmic worldview that is at odds with the ‘Left Vs. Right’ worldview of the West. When the West first encountered Indian culture, they couldn’t understand it. And when they began trying to understand it, they were frightened by it, as our systems made more sense than theirs. What they thought would be a country full of barbarians who would need to be taught culture, turned out to be a civilization that was far more superior to theirs. This was one of the chief reasons they were unable destroy it, because they soon realized that it was a treasure house of knowledge that they hadn’t been exposed to and that they could easily appropriate it.

Moreover, the Dharmic system was so inherently part of our culture that it would have been really difficult for them to destroy it physically. So they did the next best thing. They started to discredit it through political interventions, evangelization, education, media etc., which has continued on ever since till today. Whatever they thought would fit in their scheme of things they stole and the rest they discarded with disdain. The effect of this undertaking is today reaping benefits for them as we, Indians, ourselves have now bought into their discourse and just like them, identify with their narrative rather than having one on our own.

Before proceeding any further on why I think we should get out of the Left vs. Right debate altogether, I would like to mention where I stand in relation to both these views. I’m a firm, practicing Hindu. I’m a nationalist. I’m proud of my culture, heritage and traditions. I believe that we ourselves are fully capable to solve the problems we have in our society, without the intervention of any third party, be it physically or ideologically. I believe in the cultural integrity of India. I respect the Sages, Seers, Gurus and the great kings of our country. All these would automatically get me classified as a Right-winger, regressive and a bigot.

But then I’m also very much an environmental conscious person, almost a tree hugger. I respect Mother Earth and care for its living beings. I’m a vegetarian. I’m highly critical of GMO foods, because, first of all, I believe that there have not been enough tests done to fully certify them as being harmless. Secondly, because of my respect for Nature I really don’t want humans messing with it just to earn some dollars, and thirdly, I really don’t want to handover the control of what I eat, to a corporation. However, all these would immediately put me under the leftist category.

Again, I also believe that it is not the business of the government to interfere in business. I respect free market in a lot of things, as I believe it to be a fair, level playing field if not tampered with. I believe in the privatization of many services, which are currently run by the government.  All this would again put me with the ‘Right wing nuts’.

I’m sure like me, there are millions of others who have similar beliefs that simultaneously spread over both the sides. So it makes no sense to classify them as left or right as more often than not one is made to choose between these two.

But if we look from the Dharmic viewpoint on where I stand on issues, I believe my position, like many other Indians, would be fully compatible with Dharma. I’m not supporting anything that is Adharmic. To me what I believe essentially falls into this: ’Yogakshema Vahamyaham’, one of the best expressions of Dharma.

Why a Dharmic point of view is the best for India

The Left Vs. Right fight is essentially a political one. Every issue that is encompassed in either of the categories is given a political colour. Be it economics, environmentalism, religion, you name it and it becomes an election issue. So inevitably, instead of a mature understanding of issues and finding acceptable solutions by people as a family or as a collective society, people in power administer them from the top. Hence, the incessant acerbity between both the sides and a fierce struggle to capture power in any way possible. The wounds from these struggles persist for ages—sometimes there are no healing attempts from both sides. For example, in the U.S, the South still considers itself cheated by the North during the civil war, which was fought about one hundred and fifty years ago and till date has a great amount of disdain (to say the least) to its Northern brothers and Sisters.

On the other hand, Indian society already has a framework, with a mechanism to look at issues and find solutions for them through Dharma. It might need some updates for the present time, but that’s only natural. Moreover the Dharmic system allows for these updates. Issues aren’t politicized automatically. Instead of ‘rights’, there is still a huge population that believes in ‘duty.’ Hence we don’t have the ‘Right’ to exploit or the ‘Right’ to a personal space etc, but duty to our fellow beings, animals, birds, plants and even rocks. Environmentalism is not a movement, vegetarianism is not a lifestyle but an integral part of Dharma with a clear meaning and purpose that anyone born into it or accepts it, is able to imbibe that essence, understands it and follows it accordingly. We don’t expect the government to pay us when we are unemployed or grow old. Our family system takes care of it. Hence there is lesser burden and dependency on a central power.

A God or a King or a Social reformer didn’t implement this system. It wasn’t brought into existence by a single event or a book. It exists because of the collective experience, understanding, and wisdom of people who have been living here for thousands of years through imbibing its culture and the civilization. It has grown organically like the roots of a tree.

One of the peculiarities of almost all Western worldviews and philosophies is that they tend to be impractical. The Greek imposed a certain sacredness to numbers and the result of that idealization can be felt even today with Maths being a difficult subject for most children to learn.  Especially since only the Western mode (at least in Mathematics which is based on age old Greek methods) of teaching is prescribed and encouraged in schools in India. In Indian Mathematical systems such unnecessary imposition never occurred. The early Indian mathematicians were fine with treating Maths and numbers as just tools for every day’s livelihood. Similarly in the Western religion, you go to ‘Heaven’ in the future, after you are dead, where an Impersonal God with a white beard sits in the throne, judging the dead people. Whereas our Dharmic philosophy insists that Moksha is now and anybody can attain it. You don’t need to die to attain the state of perfection or Bliss.

In line with these esoteric standards, are the West’s various Economic models. What Karl Marx expounded as Communism was tried in several countries, only to be discovered as a practically impossibility that couldn’t be followed by any free society. Milton Freidman’s free market model was deemed impractical even by the free marketers themselves and consequently was implemented only in parts and never fully.

Rightly or wrongly, that implementation by Reagan during the 80s is now considered to be the starting point of the present economic crisis in the U.S and Europe. And speaking about the global economic crisis, one cannot forget the innumerous models and Nobel prizes that were given to these economists who neither could predict the crisis nor could find any practical solution to get out of it. Another ferocious capitalist, the darling of the Western fiscal conservatives and libertarians, Ayn Rand, justified the killing of Native Americans and the occupation of their land with her Capitalist theories. And these are the exemplary thinkers and their philosophies that we (both left & right) are supposed to idealize and follow!It has been the tendency of the West to first set an abstract ideal or framework into which they try to fit their everyday life. This framework may or may not be a success but is still put there blindly, as the ‘destination’ or the ‘million dollar trophy’.

But Indian civilization and its values are more organic. They tend to be more practical. Even our languages, like Sanskrit, are so practical with no irrational assumptions that plague its Western counterparts. Hence for us it does not matter what the ideal is as long as it is practical, achievable and more importantly harmonious with matter and spirit. It doesn’t matter if either the free market principles or the socialistic principles work. They both have some valid uses at certain times and at certain places and don’t work in other situations. To borrow certain things from one side doesn’t mean negating the other. Anything that works for the good of the society and falls within the purview of the Ethos that we call Dharma is welcome and needs to be supported.

Consequences of playing the Left Vs. Right Game

As explained earlier, the whole ‘Left Vs Right’ is very much a Western concept and it has been forced upon us through our education, media and politics, the effect being that most of us have started believing it as something natural to our own ecosystem. The Indian ‘Right’, especially, has been rightly concerned about the discourse on India by the West. Almost all of our present Governance, Economics (at least superficially), Administration, Entertainment, and Law has been borrowed from and/or influenced by the West. So much so that our country’s constitution has been generously moulded by other Western countries and we, strangely enough, seem to be very proud of it!

For too long, our History has been falsely written and taught. Millions of Indians have lived for generations together, with an inferiority complex that we are somehow inferior to the Western, white man. This includes even the intelligent PhDs, business tycoons and political leaders. We are ready to accept almost anything that comes out of a Westerner’s mouth. Hence it is urgently imperative to break away from this externally influenced narrative of us, at this juncture.

During the past few years, this voice of the so-called Indian Right has become stronger and more vocal with more and more well educated, informed, technologically savvy young Indians chipping in. They are not afraid to debate, ask questions and proudly claim allegiance to what they consider as true, valid and their own. This has indeed angered the Indian Left as well as the Western Liberal/Left who for the past 60 years had been given a free reign in setting the agenda for the country and are for the first time encountering a serious opposition since Independence.  And they’re retaliating furiously, trying to discredit the ‘Right’ as much as they can with lies and false propaganda. Issues like making India the rape capital, Gharwapsi, minorities fear, human rights violations are all the counteractive measures taken by the Left.

But the problem is that the so-called Indian Right has also identified itself, as ‘Right’ which is again a part of the same Western Worldview. So any desire to break away from the circle and any attempt to do so is not going to yield the desired result. If there is an attempt to take a stand on for example, a social issue, it is at once seen as a political struggle between the two sides and if the position tends to be against the Left/liberal agenda the Left’s entire intellectual mechanism, along with their political and media arms, starts working on it throughout the World.

And so the Indian Right always ends up defending its stand, always getting pushed back. Even if there is any success on any issues that it has taken up, it is always temporary and never a convincing or long-lasting one. And whatever victory it does achieve, it is as much a victory for the Left for successfully deluding the Right to bask in its achievement. There seems to be a never-ending queue of Leftists waiting to attack and slander the Right, not missing any opportunity. If it isn’t the activists and the NGOs, then it is the media or the writers, artists and intellectuals. If not them, then the politicians take up the mantle. And finally when all these have been exhausted, the courts step in and make sure that Leftists and Liberals win the day.

And this is to be expected, especially in a society which has been brainwashed for generations to be obedient babus and Sepoys. The West has always set this playing field. The Western Right might be fighting the Left in their own land. But we have to realize that it is not just the Indian Left that we are fighting, but the whole of the Western Right and Left, put together.

Both sides have huge stakes in India and they wouldn’t mind joining hands to achieve their sinister objectives. How many times have we in the recent past, seen instances where the left/liberal (in and out of India) and the so-called ‘Right’ of the West have joined hands and maligned our culture? Is it not true that the dubious NGOs here get funding from both the sides? The Indian communist will shamelessly shed tears for the Church attacks, supposedly done by Hindus, which will then become a headline in the liberal New York Times!

So by identifying with them, what is the Indian right actually fighting against? How can we even spot the real enemy when we are misidentifying as ‘Right’ with such a blurry and confused vision?

Another important issue of this identity crisis is the inability to find indigenous solutions to problems that we face here in India. By tagging ourselves along with their system we tend to look into their models and their experience to find answers for our issues. Hence by all probability any solution that we do pick, inevitably fails, as those solutions haven’t worked even for their own societies. Considering the present social-political-economic situation prevailing in the West, we would be wise to disregard their models. Conversely, by identifying with them we tend to forget to look into our own systems to find answers for our problems. The answers could be here. It most probably is. But by not even considering to look here we lose an opportunity to solve the problem right here, and with comparative ease.

Even inside the so-called Indian Right there are some incredible divisions. A lot of the ‘fiscally conservative’ Indians ironically consider RSS (which is obviously seen as the evil fountainhead of Indian Right-wing by the leftists) as Left because of their stand on certain issues relating to farmers and industry. This chunk of the Indian Right Wing mostly looks up to Western economists, their models and particularly their corporate/capitalist set up and considers that as the primary reason for their prosperity. They are ardent fans of their economic policies.

But what they forget is that India had a share of at least 25 per cent or more of the world GDP from 1AD till the 1750s. India and China together shared more than 50 per cent of the World GDP for all those centuries. India was a thriving nation with numerous industries and services. Other countries looked to India just as we look to the West nowadays. We were once a very prosperous nation indeed and we didn’t particularly practice the Capitalistic (or the socialistic) policies that are in vogue now. In fact some data suggests that in those days, everyone involved in the production of a product, say an Iron tool had a share in its sale profit unlike most of the corporate policies practiced now.

If the farmers are fighting for some issue, say their land, the Left automatically takes it up as its own fight. And the Indian Right foolishly lets the left get away with it. This being the case, on what basis does it become a leftist issue? If a farmer is insecure about something, he has the right to be so. And his insecurity must be addressed in the best way possible. It’s a human issue. And because the Right has already accepted a narrative that claims that such issues are typically the Left’s issues (just by playing the left vs. right game), they do not push to take up those causes as their own. Conversely if there are any laws or bills that are passed by the government that seem to lean towards the corporates or the rich, they are at once termed as ‘anti-people’,’ anti-poor’, ‘pro-rich’ and so on. It is at once pushed to the Right which now has to deal with the burden of defending and explaining itself, trying to look less evil.  There is no discussion on whether those laws might actually help a lot of poor people to get jobs and education.

Only by following or identifying with the native Dharma do we have any chance of breaking out of this Western narrative. Only then will we be playing to our strengths and be successful in taking on our opponents on our own terms. It will also put them on the defensive, make them get out of their comfort zone and sweat a bit for a change. By changing the discourse to ‘Dharma vs. Adharma’ we gain an upper hand to play the game as it should be played in our own backyard according to our own rules.

The Leftists would do well to remember that Dharma, millenniums ago, had declared ‘Vasudeva Kutumbhakam’, that the whole world is one big family. No communism, no amount of Marxist or Maoist propaganda can make any sense beyond that aphorism. It was Dharma that first gave us the insight that society needs to be complementary and  supplementary instead of just being equal. What one individual lacks another should stand up and make up for the shortcoming by complementing him/her. It is the duty of every member of the society to do so. And this is how our civilization has survived for such a long time.  Hence it was indeed sad to hear when a wise learned man like His Holiness the Dalai Lama said, “As far as socioeconomic theory, I am Marxist”, in a recent meeting. It shows how much the Western thought has taken over our minds and thinking.

Finally, the biggest outcome of this paradigm shift from the Left/Right fight would be the harmony that would ensue in society. Instead of the constant bickering between two sides politicizing everything, there would really be opportunities where people involved can sit, discuss and solve their problems without resorting to name calling and labeling. Instead of a society with two mutually exclusive sides struggling to outsmart each other, there could be a possibility of a society where people can work together, with mutual respect, agreeing on some issues and respectfully agreeing to disagree on others, working not to prove a point or an abstract ideology, but to address the problems of the society and nurturing the future with positivity.