Arvind Kejriwal takes his gloves off
Aam Aadmi Party chief Arvind Kejriwal’s latest spat with the media reminds us of a painful irony of the modern era: evil does not enter the public domain stealthily; it marches in the open, often with aplomb, makes its wicked goals public, and yet is ignored by those who ought to know better. And when the malevolence establishes itself, a lot of surprise and indignation is expressed—despite the fact that every subsequent unpleasant event was openly preached and zealously espoused right from the beginning.
Consider the case of Hitler’s autobiography, Mein Kampf, some of whose extracts are:
“The Jews were responsible for bringing negroes into the Rhineland with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate.” “The longer I lived in Vienna, the stronger became my hatred for the promiscuous swarm of foreign peoples [from east Europe] which began to batten on that old nursery ground of German culture.” “We must eliminate the disproportion between our population and our area… Some of this land can be obtained from Russia… We must secure for the German people the land and soil to which they are entitled.” “[The state] must see to it that only the healthy beget children.”
Almost three quarters of a century before Hitler announced his Nazi agenda, Marx and Engels propounded an equally, if not more, dangerous ideology—communism. In the Communist Manifesto (1848), they thundered, “Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can only be attained by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.” Later communists like Lenin, Stalin, and Mao also never concealed their opinions and objectives.
Islamists all over the world, too, don’t feel shy in revealing their ultimate goal—global supremacy of Islam, imposition of Shariat, and dhimmitude for the non-believers. Yet, when there was September 11 or 26/11, there was shock and awe, as if something unexpected had happened.
Nor is anything unexpected in the way the AAP is behaving these days. When Arvind Kejriwal and his chums burst onto the political firmament—and especially after the party did well in Delhi Assembly polls—a large section of intellectuals and many media pundits saw in him a possible roadblock to the Modi juggernaut. So, AAP leaders’ sympathies with the Maoists and jihadists were ignored; the party’s predilection for the discredited socialism was downplayed; its policies were seldom scrutinized; and, in this age of media ubiquity, the party was allowed to peddle its lies.
[contextly_sidebar id=”Dma8GrX3SsD8yofc0tRpHfvGRQfaknhn”]
Arvind Kejriwal has proved to be a congenital liar (among other things, promised to throw Sheila Dikshit behind bars but did not act while in office) and dangerous perjurer (took oath to uphold the Constitution but violated it brazenly). He started hurling allegations at everybody he did not like—from Congress and Bharatiya Janata Party leaders to big corporations and then the media. Emboldened by his success in Delhi polls, Arvind Kejriwal went on to threaten the media.
He threatened journalists that he would send them to jail. “Since past one year, the media has been drumming support for Modi in people’s minds. An aura is sought to be created that corruption would end and Ramrajya will come if Modi is elected,” Kejriwal said in Nagpur a few days ago. “Why such a thing is happening? Because businessmen have paid money to media and television channels to promote Modi.”
Anybody even slightly familiar with Indian politics knows that many journalists and media houses have continuously ran stories against the Gujarat chief minister. In fact, many of them hate Narendra Modi; this was a big factor in their earlier support for Arvind Kejriwal in the first place. And now Kejriwal himself accuses them of being pro-Modi!
There was outrage in the media. Comparisons were made about the AAP’s attitude and the mindset that was responsible for the Emergency. The point to note here is that there was nothing surprising in Kejriwal’s mendacity, antics, and bullying; they are part and parcel of Maoism that he and his buddies sympathize with. The AAP’s behavior is the natural corollary of its ideology.






Arvind Kejriwal was ambitious and a crook from beginning. Follow his graph.He went and worked for Mother Teresa foundation just for three months to be noticed by Ford Foundation.His Aim was magasasy.Most who get this award work against establishment.While working for IT department he never left Delhi and one reason apparently was his NGO and funding.He did not mind aproching Sonia for stopping his posting.He went for study leave to US who funded it remains a mystery.After US so called study leave stint he became full time activist and used everybody including Anna.But did he become too ambitious. Anna movement and disgust of people and large no of scams Delhi wanted change.BJP could not provide an alternative resulted in AAP getting 28 seats which was a form of NOTA vote.This success went into Kejriwal’s head who already had a bloated ego.He became too ambitious too soon.Most of the people who led this new were crooks and blackmailers from Media and large support came from frustrated young generation working in Call centres night after night and surviving at the discretion of their bosses.Everyday long hours underpaid jobs with no security were motivators for taking power in own hands.It was a revolution or mutiny against current government with the hope that they will turn into Tehrir square.Jokers never realised Undia is huge and diverse that such revolution can never happen in India.It did not happen in 1857.For the same reason in India there ca never be coup.So we can right obituary of AAP after 16 May.It would be called a revolution by English TV channels that never happened.
It is the mistake of media. On its prejudice against Modi, they projected Kejriwal. He met secretly Ahmed Patel. Deal was struck for an escape route for Sheila Dixit. Kejri made a lot of stunts, first day he came by train and afterwards he moved with motorcade. First he refused to take a house and now he refuses to vacate it. He says corporate are funding Modi and he is flying by An Exclusive Jet provided by India Today Group. He says he is fighting against corruption but he is not opposing Bansal, Kalmadi. He is going to oppose Modi. Full of contradictions.
Indian media deserves this. AAP was nothing two years before and Media only projected him as a great personality. They covered all his double talks and made him a big hero. Now it backfires.
I do not agree with above. If we go in the past, Mahatma Gandhi and Sardar Bhagat Singh also raised their voice against the system which was prevalent then. They were called Arajak and terrorist by then govt.at that time. But now they are called patriots.
As far as Hitler is concerned, he was against Jews other classes while AK never gave any comment like this, against any caste or religion. so Hitler and AK can not be compared.
If this time is like the emergency period, and Emergency period was so bad then, at first, Congress must be removed from National politics. We can not have two stands for same thing.
As far as Sheila Dikshit is concerned, AK followed all democratic process which takes time due to current inappropriate system. So he could not succeed to get her in Jail in such a short time. Only a dictator could do that in such a short time like in Pakistan politics. It means he has strong faith in true democracy.
No doubt, Indian public also of the view that our journalism is not fully mature not professional and not impartial but truly commercial. If they make AK rise unnecessarily, then it was wrong at that time and now they are taking things personally, it is also wrong. Our Journalist need to be more impartial and professional in future.
It is also not wrong to raise question on Journalism if there is something wrong there. Journalist not above our constitution.
Actually I think, He is changing the rules of estabilished politics and so old estabilished players are feeling the danger. He is agressive and expressive about our politics and politicians which never happened in Indian politics so it seeming somewhat odd to intelligentia. This is the starting of Indian being expressive which is must to be at the top of the world. We need to come out our cowardice and accept new changes which are beneficial for this nation.
Dear AAPite common sense is not an I-Phone feature.
regards 🙂