Published On: Thu, Dec 11th, 2014

The Legacy of Christian Politics

Share This
Tags

This was contributed by an IndiaFacts reader from Sri Lanka.

This opinion piece is intended to throw light on a subject that the Anglicized Sri Lankan Establishment never discusses. The political role played by the church is deliberately covered up in Sri Lanka. The English speaking Sri Lankan intelligentsia instead focuses on Buddhist, Hindu and Muslim fundamentalism. Its important to investigate, scrutinize and ferret out what is intentionally overlooked in Sri Lankan debates.

This synopsis is intended to illustrate the role of the church in international politics. The subject is by definition vast and examples can be provided from every continent. But brevity demands that this be a short and selective piece.

This is not to deny the civilizational and intellectual role of Christianity in defining Europe along with the latter’s rich Graeco-Roman inheritance. This is not to attack Christians. Violence and prejudice exists in all religions. This precis is merely a corrective to the exclusive focus on Buddhist, Hindu and Muslim fundamentalism in the Colombo discussion circuit.

 Africa

The church sanctioned the African slave trade in keeping with the tenets of the Bible. Pope Nicholas V issued a papal bull in 1452 justifying the slave trade. 12 Million Black Africans were shipped to the Americas between the 16th and 19th centuries. An added 4 million Africans are estimated to have died in the process.

What is less known are the recent events in Africa. The 1980s and 1990s marked the emergence of the Republican Neo-Right in American politics, one linked to Pope John Paul II and the Evangelical Protestant Church. Ronald Reagan and George Bush epitomized this politics. The goal was to roll back Communism in Europe, Christianize Africa and intervene in the Middle East.

There was an organized and well-funded Christianization of the African continent on an unparalleled scale. Missionaries dismissed traditional African mores as “animist”, “backward” and “pagan”. Conversions disrupted social links, undermined tribal cohesion and fractured grass-roots society. Africans were taught to denigrate and reject their own past. This mass evangelization accelerated the breakdown of the African state and contributed to endemic civil conflict. That in turn displaced millions and resulted in famine and HIV/AIDS. Examples include the Congo, South Sudan and Rwanda. It also led to the heightening of Christian Muslim tensions in Nigeria, Sudan, the Central African Republic, Chad, Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Burkina Faso and Kenya.

[pullquote]The English speaking Sri Lankan intelligentsia instead focuses on Buddhist, Hindu and Muslim fundamentalism.[/pullquote]

A million Rwandans, almost all tribal Tutsis, were killed between April and June 1994. The United Nations did nothing as the murders took place in full view of international television. Timothy Longman released his monumental thesis in 2010 entitled Christianity and Genocide in Rwanda published by Cambridge University Press. Churches became the primary killing grounds. Archbishop Thaddeo Nthinyurva, Bishop Augustin Misago, Bishop Jonathan Ruhumuliza and countless nuns and priests were accused of participating in the genocide.

The church did not excommunicate any of them. The church fostered tribal divisions between the Tutsis and Hutus with its spurious scholarship of the Nilotic Tutsis and the Bantu Hutus. The two “tribes” however spoke the same language, followed the same tradititional religious customs and were racially linked! This was a social division and not racial. The Roman Catholic church backed by France supported the genocidal Hutu Administration. The message was sent out that tribal discrimination was consistent with church teaching.

A revisionist history tries to downplay this by advertising the role of isolated clergymen who helped save lives. This revisionist history is perhaps intended to whitewash a brutal episode.

rwanda

The Dutch Reformed Church similarly legitimized and sanctioned the system of Apartheid in South Africa. Blacks were excluded from wealth, power and dignity. A series of well educated and pious Dutch-speaking Calvinist theologians justified the racial segregation with reference to the Bible. This was standard Calvinist dogma in South Africa until 1992. The revisionist Christian history would like to down play these sorry instances with references to activist anti-Apartheid clergymen instead.

 Europe

Much of the Anti-Semitism that defined European history since the introduction of Christianity can be traced to the New Testament where the Jews were referred to as “sons of the devil”, “vipers” and “hypocrites”. This scriptural sanction explained the repeated violence and mass murder directed at the Jews. St Augustine of Hippo, Saint John Chrysostom and Saint Ephrem the Syrian provided the theological basis for the persecution of Jews. The Jews were accused of Deicide or the murder of “God” i.e. Jesus. Pope Paul IV in 1555 issued a Papal Bull sanctioning pogroms.

The Spanish Inquisition and the Nazi Holocaust took place in a context shaped by Christianity. Pope Pius XII was silent as millions of Jews were sent to the gas chambers in Europe. When Germany was defeated in 1945, the church helped Nazis flee to South America. John Cornwall published his work Hitler’s Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII in 1999, which discusses these events in detail. Pope Francis is expected to canonize Pope Pius XII as a saint.

inqusition 1

What is less well known was the similar burning of women at the stake by the medieval church. Pope Gregory VII in 1080, Pope John XX11 in 1320 and Pope Innocent VIII in 1484 invoked the Bible to sanction the killing of women suspected of witchcraft. While revisionist historians linked to the church downplay this act of cruelty, Mary Daly, an American feminist theologian, estimates that nine million women were burnt on the stake in Europe between 1450 and 1750 AD. She published her Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism in 1978. The modern church and associated scholarship vigorously disputes her conclusions.

The Americas

The extermination of the indigenous peoples in the Americas and Australia can also be attributed to the introduction of Christianity and white man’s rule. The Spanish massacred, pillaged and destroyed the Native Americans in the name of Jesus. Pre Christian America had developed in isolation and had its towering achievements in mathematics, astronomy, engineering, literature and the arts, a legacy which has now been completely obliterated. Inca, Maya and Aztec monuments were razed. This represented a successful instance of cultural genocide.

incans

The Native Americans perished as they were forced into hard and inhumane slave labor. It is estimated that there were 50 million Native Americans in 1490. This declined to 1.8 million in 1890. American historian David Stannard has documented this in his thesis American Holocaust published by Oxford University Press in 1992. The revisionist church attributes the whole sale disappearance of the indigenous peoples to the ravages of European disease. That analysis conveniently omits deliberate attempts at murder, killing and slave labour. A revisionist history instead emphasizes the actions of individual Christian clergy men who attempted to help the native American. These were the exception to the rule.

Conclusion

Many more examples can be provided using the histories of Asia and the Middle East. So before we focus on Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist fundamentalism alone, lets not deliberately sidestep Christian politics and its legacy. Its important to be even-handed while assessing religious fundamentalism and its impact on politics.

About the Author

- IndiaFacts Staff articles, reports and guest pieces


Displaying 16 Comments
Have Your Say
  1. Kalavai Venkat says:

    I want to thank the writer for this outstanding article. In Sri Lanka, Hindus and Buddhists have coexisted for two millennia. The church played a key part in creating ans sustaining the strife over the last 50 years. As Sri Lanka burned, they proselytized both Hindus and Buddhists and captured power.

  2. Mithie says:

    brilliant paper by the Sri Lankan reader.

  3. Raman says:

    I forgot to thank the writer. What was most enlightening to me at least was the specifics on the Rwanda genocide and burning innocent women in the name of jesus. I am sure your country’s literati did not appreciate your points but it needed to be said anyway. Demolish their self righteous pretensions! I would also highlight the Congo genocide by the Belgians in the 1890s.

  4. Aryo Sastro says:

    what a fascist bore!

  5. TV says:

    Indian/not/amused is a troll and a fake. Ignore the sucker.

  6. Raman says:

    This is standard anti Tamil propaganda. Its rubbish as several
    of the commentators have themselves noted. You have not responded to any of my
    points which only shows that you can not. You are not a Hindu.

    Subramanian Swamy is simply unelectable. No one takes him seriously.

    Now read this!

    http://hinduexistence.org/2013/03/20/ignoring-tamil-hindu-genocide-in-sl-is-a-sin-of-indian-politics-delhi-to-geneva-all-should-make-a-justice-to-the-150000-tamil-victims/

    http://www.srilankaguardian.org/2014/07/is-india-adopting-pro-islamic-and-anti.html

    • Ruben says:

      you are a self righteous person who claims to speak for 1.2 billion Indians. How dare you? Who are you to speak on behalf of us? Speak for your self. Most Indians have no real affinity to the sri lankan government as you claim. As one commentator said above, you are likely a Sinhala pretending to be one of us.

  7. Jeevan says:

    IndiannotAmused – you are being simplistic. Do not detract from what the author is saying. The hackneyed “LTTE is Christian” bogey is flawed and one created by the Rajapakses and their ilk. The Sri Lankan Tamils and its political establishment are mostly Hindu. Tamil separatism arose because of Buddhist belligerence. Christians hijacked the movement because the Hindu (read RSS) leadership in India continued to ignore the Tamil issue! The LTTE top leadership was NOT made up of converted Christians. They were middle caste Hindu, Prabhakaran included. It was their advisers who were bishops and archbishops much as Rajapakse’s advisers are. You come across as anti Tamil, a mind set which allowed the Christians to succeed.

    • Radha Rajan says:

      Rajapakse and his brothers are Christian as is all Sinhala political leadership and most of Tamil political leadership. The church is playing both sides of the civil war in Sri lanka because no matter who wins or loses, the church wins everytime.

      • Raman says:

        Rajapakse, his brothers and the Sinhalese political leadership are indeed Christian. Rajapakse invited the Pope to visit before any Asian, African or Arab leader had, and traveled to the Vatican many times. He visited Nativity Square in Bethlehem and the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem. His first ever visit to Lumbini by contrast was only last month. No one talks about that. Rajapakse’s biggest supporter in Sri Lanka is Cardinal Malcolm Ranjit a Sinhalese and former Vatican emissary to Indonesia when East Timor was created! No one talks about Rajapakse’s Christian connections in India.

        Justice Wigneswaran the Chief Minister of the Sri Lankan North was with the Dalai Lama and the RSS Sangh Sarchalak in inaugurating the World Hindu Congress last month. Wigneswaran starts ALL his speeches in Sri Lanka or elsewhere with a Sanskrit Sloka. No one covered his speech at the Conference either!

  8. Radha Rajan says:

    What Hindu fundamentalism?

    • Aryo Sastro says:

      look at the mirror lady!

    • Surya Kant says:

      Fundamentalism is not possible or sustainable in Hinduism. Dharmic system is a conglomeration of distinct intellectual or philosophical points of view, rather than a rigid common set of beliefs, thus the basic definition of fundamentalism cannot apply to Hinduism because it does not contain any fundamental thoughts to abide to. There is not One Messenger or One History or One God type cosmic-dictatorship or ‘history-centrism’.

Leave a comment