Narendra Modi and the Law of Unspecified Prerequisites
A most important factor responsible for rout of the Bharatiya Janata Party in the Delhi Assembly polls pertains to a simple fact: the Narendra Modi dispensation forgot the fundamental difference between divine powers and human capabilities.
“God said, ‘Let there be light!’ So there was light” (Bible, Genesis 1.3). Similarly, when Hindu gods bless a worshipper with a boon, they just have to say “Tathastu!” and the worshipper’s wish comes true. But, unlike gods, men and women cannot just make some wish, say a few words, and expect the favorable results. If we wish to have light, we must have a bulb and electricity connection, and we have to switch on the bulb.
[pullquote]Oratory minus genuineness is rhetoric, and few appreciate rhetoric. Evidently, fewer voted for it.[/pullquote]
In this context, it is important to pay heed to what I call the Law of Unspecified Prerequisites. If you want to have a physique similar to that of movie stars and models, you have to bring in a major change in my routine, diet, and other habits. You have to eat carefully; you must avoid fried and high-calorie food, sweets, smoking, drinks, etc. You have to exercise regularly, take adequate rest, and so on. These are the prerequisites for a healthy, good-looking body. A new-year resolution or a desire, however fervent, for an attractive physique will not help you beyond a point; nor would miracle pills, magic therapies, the chanting of some mantra. Similarly, if a student wants to do well in exams, he has to study hard; pujas, offerings, rituals, etc., will take him nowhere.
In the realm of statecraft and economic management, too, there are several prerequisites for achieving targets. However eloquent the speech on good governance and new initiatives may be, and however grand may be the occasion, the objectives cannot be met without solid action. It is here that the Modi government was found lacking. Consider the two marquee initiatives of the Modi regime—the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan and Make in India. The success of the former is predicated upon a complete makeover in the ways the country is governed: the local authorities should be efficient and professional; sweepers should be doing their jobs; waste should be collected and disposed of properly; industrial effluents and sewage should be treated before getting dumped into rivers; and long is the list of must-dos.
But little, if anything, was done on the ground. So, when the Aam Aadmi Party slammed the BJP for its incompetence, it resonated with the feelings of the people of Delhi. In a statement in November, it said, “The miserable condition of cleanliness in the national capital shows the real face of the BJP-run Municipal Corporations of Delhi.” The AAP was stating the obvious, as the incompetence and corruption of Delhi’s municipal bodies was for all to see; it took Rs 12 crore and 13 years to prepare MCD’s web portal, and even then it was incomplete. But the BJP grandees could not see the writing on the wall—or even in the social media where it has considerable experience and acumen.
All the nice things that Modi said about governance, which sounded genuine when he was campaigning for Lok Sabha elections, started appearing hollow. Oratory minus genuineness is rhetoric, and few appreciate rhetoric. Evidently, fewer voted for it.
Similarly, just by organizing gala functions to promote the Make in India programme, the economy would not be galvanized. According to National Manufacturing Policy 2011, “On an average, a manufacturing unit needs to comply with nearly 70 laws and regulations. Apart from facing multiple inspections, these units have to file sometime as many as 100 returns in a year. This kind of compliance burden puts-off young entrepreneurs and they are not willing to take up an entrepreneurial role. As a result, a large number of people who could have been self-employed and would contribute to further employment and enhance economic activity, end up accepting jobs much below their potential.”
[pullquote]In the realm of statecraft and economic management, too, there are several prerequisites for achieving targets. However eloquent the speech on good governance and new initiatives may be, and however grand may be the occasion, the objectives cannot be met without solid action.[/pullquote]
The Modi government indeed did take a few steps to improve the situation, but not as much as his supporters had desired. In general, his government’s position on economic reforms has been gradualist, whereas the mandate was for a paradigm shift. It was the mandate for change; what we got was not even change with continuity but continuity with minor alterations—and that too mainly in nomenclature.
At any rate, there was not as much emphasis on remedial government action as bombast and jamborees. Perhaps the powers that be were convinced that they have divine powers; the words and wishes would become real. The February 10 results have shown that human beings, however powerful, can never be godlike. So, the lesson to be learnt is: Never ignore the Law of Unspecified Prerequisites.






I would sum up the NaMo Sarkar till date as : ALL RHETORIC; NOTHING SUBSTANTIVE TO MAKE A CHANGE FOR THE AAM AADMI. Period. Less Talk ; More Karma Yoga please. And, I’m still waiting for the promised “Rs. 15 lakh ” !! Regards
Some parts of the writer’s article are OK, but I believe that it is also silly for human beings to transform a country which has been continuosly destroyed since 1950, in just 9 months. In the matters pertaining to an economic growth, cleanliness, fixing corruption, etc, I think we are being too harsh on Modi. In all elections across the world, political parties ‘promise the moon’ to voters, but finally are only able to fulfil part of them. If Modi is able to fix even 20% of what promised, he would be considered successful.
I live in Gurgaon, my work takes me the capital at least once a week. I always feel that many of these pollsters are ‘rank outsiders’, meaning most of the polls that are conducted are always wrong. Take Delhi. We are being told that as late as December, BJP had an advantage and only later lost it. I really have no idea how that survey was being made. Being an extremely extrovert person, I have a habit of speaking with all and sundy. Since October at least whenever I spoke with the auto rikshawwallah, shopkeeper, business people, passengers on the bus, etc, 9 out of 10 told me they would vote for AAP. Many of them told me that on a national level they voted for Modi as that is on the national level. But on local level their vote would be for Kejriwal, because he did fix corruption and many other problems in the 49 days that he ruled (I know that was just a perception, but that is what most people told me). I could hardly find anyone who told me that he wasn’t going to vote for AAP. I really don’t know who are the people that the pollsters contacted.
But to summarize, my complaints with the BJP gov’t is that it is also trying its best to appease minorities,and not supporting persons like Sakshi Maharaj and Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti. Not even supporting their own VHP in ‘ghar waapsi’ while turning a blind eye to Chrisian missionaries conversion and Islamic goondagardi
Normally the country’s new leader waits for two, three or even four years before embarking on foreign countries tour (expept, of course going for necessary meetings). Modi saw our country’s different requirement. He realized that development takes time. So very early in his reign, he embarked on visiting many important countries which can invest in India. Investment takes time. Land acquisition, factory construction etc. before hiring and production starts. In about three years, India’s development will be humming. If he waited to visit these countries for normal three four years, by the time new election comes there would not be recognizable development and we could have witnessed one more ‘India Shining’ failure. As Vikram mentioned, Modi is fighting on many fronts. One such example is media, 10 Lakhs Rupee suit Vis-a-vis 7000 Rupee suit.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/christian-community-to-host-modi/article6888677.ece
Another Vajapayee in the making ? Should we consider this as strategy ?
The single act of PMO intervention in the chruch attacks makes Modi become more Congressi than the Congressi Sanjay Jha. But everyone can fail, but failing for the secular forces is a mockery of the people’s faith who voted BJP to correct the narrative about the secularism itself.
No doubt your cautionary analysis is timely. And Government’s attention ought to be put into suggestions implied in it. But as it is 9 months since Modi took the charge of a country of vast magnitude (in many aspects) of 120 crores and expectations are on high. Compared to that how much time should be given to Arvind Kejriwal who has to deliver on his high promises only to 1.6% of population? And mind it, he has limited responsibilities to look after!
Yes, we all wish that dramatic change should have happened by now. But just how do you transform a moribund government machinery (which includes large swathes of your own party corporators, MLAs, MPs as well) so quickly? I believe Modi is trying a top down approach wherein he sets the pace, and makes gradual changes to bureacracy. We should not forget that India’s challenges are HUGE, and Modi is fighting (a mostly lone) battle on many fronts – to dismiss even genuine achievements of last 9 months of this government as bombast is to do a great disservice to India