Published On: Wed, Feb 14th, 2018

What’s Love Gotta Do with it? Valentine’s Day & Fringe Groups’ Agenda

The human soul has still greater need of the ideal than of the real. It is by the real that we exist, it is by the ideal that we live. – Victor Hugo

When it comes to the talking about love no other country has, as many love stories as India.  Royalty in ancient India might have tied the knot for sake of convenience, but all our Gods had ‘marriages of choice’.  Often they did much ‘tapas’ to get the object of their affection.  And even though Laila-Majnun’s story is originally not Indian, India has immortalized it in movies, and songs, more than the country of its origin.  Not to mention that we have several such Indian stories to beat the Romeo-Juliet concept.  And not to forget that erotic love in India was not only accepted but, actually celebrated.

So why object to Valentine’s Day celebration?

Growing up in India, we may not have known much about St. Valentine, but we sure heard much about love.  How can you not in the land of Geeta Govinda? (I would include Bollywood but in the last two decades our film industries have tried to match non-Indian film industries in forwarding what ‘love’ means.)

Commitment and dedication in marriage, and the significance of having only one partner in a lifetime was also drilled into us!  Commitment was held higher than meaningless attachments.  And such expectations of physical and emotional purity, an important aspect of defining character, were not ‘only’ from women but also men.  And therefore, the idea of ‘Puroshottam Ram, the ideal man who broke the tradition of Kings having multiple wives, and was devoted only to Ma Sita, even they were apart, whether as Ravana’s captive, or with Rishi Valmiki when Lord Rama had to give up his pati-dharma to follow raj-dharma.

Celebration of love in the Indian context was also never limited to romantic love, amor but acknowledged an agape like passion for various relationships.  Parents’, especially mother’s love for their children, (also rendered in mythology, history, movies, songs and poetry), love for your family-especially the sister-brother relationship through Raksha-Bandhan, love of students for their teachers and vice-versa, and so on.  There were many words to distinguish between various manifestations of love – prem, sneh, vatsalya, mamta, pyaar, preet, pranay, kaamna, chaah, sammoh, and anuraag.

Rich, deep, thought-provoking, inspiring stuff!

Did it mean that we did not have unhealthy relationships where love’s flow was blocked?  Absolutely not!  There were cracks.  And they cracks were measured with an ideal—Adarsh! What ought to be!!

But a rude awakening, about how narrow was the understanding of love in many places, awaited me.  On my first Valentine’s Day in the US, along with junk mail, phone bill and some coupons, in my dorm mailbox, there was a condom.  The resident director smiled at my confusion, and said, ‘Happy Valentine’s day!’, as if it was a token of genuine concern.

The word ‘love’ itself was used glibly – love for a person was expressed with same words and tone, as love of food, pets or TV shows.  Like was equated with love, love was often only a like.  And romantic love, though may nor may not have the intention of commitment, was always accompanied with physical affection.  In fact, exchange of physical affection was how a ‘love’ relationship began, in the expectation that it will lead to trust and a healthy emotional relationship, not the other way around.

Interestingly, today this idea of love—where physical precedes and takes precedence over the emotional, mental and spiritual, is what is reinforced via the mediaBut more interestingly, this message of love and sex (and consumerism) being intertwined is often directed at people who are not in a committed relationship.  Despite being romantic musicals Bollywood, until recently, focused on emotional involvement sans physical one.  Mainly because it understood that exchange of physical affection without meeting of the souls was meaningless.  Physical union was not less important, but enhanced by an emotional connection.  Since the support of western studios, even Bollywood has leaned towards a more Hollywood style of ‘love’, which promotes physical intimacy, without accountability.   More movies about joys of uncommitted sex are made than an unwanted pregnancy or emotional scars from meaningless relationships.

Valentine’s Day was supposed to address both platonic and romantic love.  But, the mother of all media industries, the US, has focused only on the romantic and intertwined sex and love, very conveniently, in service of market economy. Every sitcom and magazine has special issue dedicated to the day.  No surprise that come Valentine’s Day, restaurants are booked, sales of chocolates and flowers goes up, movies are released, diamond rings are bought, and possibly sale of contraceptives is high around February.  In fact, countries such as Pakistan and Indonesia have complained about the fact that condoms are promoted as a ‘guilt free pass’, around February 14.

So, when these holidays get transported to India, Indonesia, Pakistan etc. the focus on platonic love is missing.  Delivering a dual function, of consumerism and westernization, Valentine’s day is turned into a ‘youth festival’ and made to seem ‘progressive’ which the ‘backward, older generation’ cannot understand.’

For those who are already turned off by reading this and will not read further, let me state that Valentine’s day celebration is not that popular in Europe, the birthplace of the Saint.  And that by no means am I supporting the violence that has sometime accompanied Valentine’s Day in India and other countries.

While protests against Valentine’s Day are presented as protests against modernization (think westernization), here are some thoughts on aspects that are hardly considered in detail.

Concept of Love itself

The concept of love in the east, with its special focus on reincarnation, is certainly very unique.  In the east, love was not arrived at, by trial and error, it was a resolve that continued for lifetimes, not just one short life, and so in a sense as it was close as one can get to eternity. The seventh century novel Kadambari, is actually a love story where the lovers go through several lifetimes to be with each other.  The adarsh in India was long-term relationship, even when it was a Gandharva vivah (equivalent of western romantic love), which provided security to the family unit and therefore the society.  Not a fling, nor just summer-dating, or something to be experimented with.  Inherent in that idea was conviction of ‘knowing one’s heart’.  Indian spring holiday of Vasant Utsav or Holi and autumn celebration of Vivaah Panchami were dedicated to celebrating love and commitment.   While Krishna, is associated with Holi, both Lord Ram and Lord Shiva hailed on Vivaah Panchami, testifying that love in all forms was praised in our culture.

Valentine’s Day, as celebrated today, does not focus on commitment.  The focus on the same person and several lifetimes would make it much too eastern.  Valentine’s Day in the way it is advertised to keep it controversy free is — just about the moment, flowers, chocolates, latest movie followed by a three course dinner at an expensive restaurant.  Very market oriented—with a focus on boosting sales!! An example of this thinking is that a sleazy film like Fifty Shades of Gray was released in February of 2014, as a date-movie.  What’s love got to do with it?

The Adarsh is Missing, and love is commoditized

Adarsh, the ideal what ought to be, is a standard which every society must have, both personal and public.  What is the ‘ideal’ in this case? Is there one? The concept that what we do in private lives does not matter until it affects anyone is quite incomplete.  As I see it, many of our acts, both public and private have a ripple effect.  But the fact is that Valentine’s Day with its public celebration is not really a private affair.  And often this depiction of love does not necessarily imply long-term commitment or sacrifice, both of which are an important component when we talk about ‘love’.

While there should not be any restriction on how and with whom we fall in love, the casual associations and flings promoted as a lifestyle are certainly not the ideal.  In fact, it is a good recipe for taking commitment lightly.  Old Bollywood movies therefore, reflecting the Indian ideal, began in playfulness, courtship and usually ended in marriage.  But the commitment free emotional entanglement is a sure recipe for creating a very insecure population because it removes the significance of accountability.  Love, in a real sense should begin and continue in commitment with an inherent idea of improving oneself and the relationship.  As I heard somewhere, ‘Love is a decision’.  In fact, it is both an emotion and a decision, but once the decision is made, emotions are not the only ones leading the way, for they fluctuate even with the waxing and waning of the moon.  Because, ideally the emotion and the decision, are supposed to function like one.

What value is love without commitment? Romantic or not.  Adarsh-romantic love, would always end up singing, janam janam ka saath hamara!

Critique is equated with Being Regressive, even as every emotion is commoditized

Globalization can be blamed for this one.  As a part of a global market we must join forces and believe that all these holidays –especially if they come from the west, are just part of being ‘modern’.  We must also buy the idea that all cultures and civilizations end up on the same road as that the west has paved.

Mother’s and Father’s day, also new to India, are holidays to bring families together in countries where adult children do not live with their parents.  In India, holidays such as Raksha Bandhan, Bhai Duj, Goad-Bharai (for pregnant women), and tradition of post-natal women to stay at their parents for months are ways in which families connect regularly.  During these visits, daughters and sisters, sons and brothers exchange gifts.  Parents, grandparents and other extended family members are always a part of that celebration.

While people have less of an objection to parent’s day celebrations, they are artificially created Hallmark holidays (the card company)! Notice how cleverly the days are placed on Sundays, which while providing no extra time away from work (no loss to the state) generate revenue for the stores.  Valentine’s Day is the same, while it does not fall on a Sunday because it is the birthdate of the saint, no day is given off and it generates sales.  But to question these new imports is considered backward, and an opposition to modernization.  So, how about we change the question.  Would countries like the US be willing to add about three national holidays for these days?  So that families and romantic relationships can truly be celebrated at home with loved ones? But that would cost the state and might even reduce sales – na bibi na bachcha, na baap bada na maiya, the whole thing is that ke bhaiya sabse bada rupaiyah!

Duplicitous media: Media‘s Deliberate Incomplete Reporting

Advertisements for Valentine’s day start appearing in January, but there is hardly ever a show on what might be common wo/man’s arguments against this.  Media simply covers the anger and violence that follows Valentine’s Day, without ever having a serious coverage of various viewpoints or questioning the impact of short term love commitments on a society.  It is interesting to see how Indian media, for the last decade, has reveled in first reminding people of the day, and then covered the anger towards the celebration.  Never have they tried to do a long series on understanding of love from a stand-point of different cultures, and the reasons behind them.  Nor do they critique the commercial aspect of Valentine’s Day.  Nor have they talked about failure of romantic love, almost everywhere.  Considering practically ‘every marriage’ in western countries is supposedly a result of ‘love-interaction’ it is interesting to examine the high rate of divorce or the fact that people would rather co-habit than commit.  Seriously, where in this scenario do we smell ‘love?’ If media were concerned, it could simply make a pact with the concept of ‘non-commercialization of emotions’, and not allow any ads related to Valentine’s day, no celebration of it on any TV shows and no Bollywood songs around it.  After all, India has a much better celebration for spring, – Saraswati Puja, Goddess of knowledge, how many countries outside of India, does one see copying our festivals?  The fact is that media, especially English speaking media in India has been interested in presenting native traditions as being in conflict with modernity, animal rights and environmentally conscious behavior.  So it frames everything from Illayraja’s win to IPL auction in terms that somehow show divisions in India, or present India as a strife-stricken society that is still living in the dark ages.  Kahein to —- Kahin pe nigahen, kahin pe nishaana…

Alla Hjartans Dag (All Hearts Day)

In Scandinavia only weeks before Valentine’s Day, I realized that there were a few things different from the US.  Valentine’s Day not only did not have much presence in the display windows, but also there were hardly any special sales, or ads or shows on TV to ‘celebrate’.  In the following years, I would learn that Sweden, a country that very much prides itself in its domestic culture and has resisted Americanization in many ways, comes up with a Swedish equivalent for every English word and even a new name for a supposedly an international holiday (my favorite Swedish word is häftapparat—stapler.  No other country that I have lived in or travelled to has called it by any other name other than a stapler.) Swedes, who refuse to accept domination of English and Swedishize everything.  So Valentine’s Day then becomes Alla Hjartans DagAll Hearts Day and is associated more with agape than amor.  But more importantly, there is no focus on spending.  People usually spend it at home with loved ones, in some cases sales of flowers may go up, for they work well with freezing February in Sweden.  In that sense, the suggestion of turning Feb 14 to ‘Love Your Parents Day’, is not such a bad idea.  So, yes, ‘love your family day’ instead of Valentine’s Day is a good option.  Well, an Indian ‘Alla Hjartans Dag’ can be ‘Har Dil Pyar Kare’ (every heart loves).  All about love! No need for gifts, no flowers, no three-course meals at restaurants, but just a heart crazy with love that sings with passion.

Featured Image: Flickr

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. IndiaFacts does not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information in this article.

About the Author


Displaying 20 Comments
Have Your Say
  1. Shridas says:

    ” So, yes, ‘love your family day’ instead of Valentine’s Day is a good option. ”
    Family is already prized to the utmost in our India, I think a day for lovers is better, being that even now, dating and having a girlfriend or boyfriend is still shunned, shamed and taboo across most of our villages, towns and even cities. Maybe a “Tell Your Family Who You Would Like To Marry Instead Of Them Telling You Day” would even be better.

    • guest says:

      ‘Tell Your Family Who You Would Like To Marry Instead Of Them Telling You Day’ happens in many countries, do you want to check their status of family life? separation rates?

      • Shridas says:

        False equivalency. And just because a couple isn’t divorced doesn’t mean they love each other.

        • guest says:

          No, its not equivalency. It is actually asking you the consequences of those approaches to life. And what love? convenient, temporary, selfish love…?

          • HARRY says:

            Exactly, what I wanted to say. ???

          • Shridas says:

            “And if love relationships do not lead to long term relationships”
            Plenty do.
            You are equating love to divorce. And arranged marriage and staying together as a type of “real” love or “commitment”. Again, all false equivalencies.
            There is absolutely no “issue” with romantic love. Romantic love is great and commitment makes it greater. I hope you get to experience both and be happy.

          • guest says:

            Problem with a response like this is that it does not want to look at flaws in its own argument. Also, it becomes a personal attack, assuming that those who write or agree with such things have no understanding of certain relationships or have not experienced them (too much assumption). The fact is that there has been a decline in the concept of commitment in love relationships, flings and short term relationships are promoted. Even many long term relationships are arrived at after several break ups. Not that relationships that are not good should be continued. But the point is that younger and younger people are encouraged to engage in this–leaving very little space for them to develop their inner strength. there as reason that people in India suggested that romantic or other relationships that lead to long term commitments should be begun after one has worked towards a career (or established a sense of self, during which learning and self-discipline along with learning a skill to survive on your own was important.) Don’t think the suggestion is that love relationships are ‘all’ bad, as you would agree neither are all ‘arranged marriages’ bad. But promoting commitment less relationships (we’ll see where it goes) –is problematic, without a doubt. Your argument that plenty do, is understandable, but by that token plenty of arranged marriages work out great, or are you going to say that all those are forced and kept together artificially? Have you never heard of people in love relationships who stay together for the fear of being alone –?? or not being economically self sufficient?

          • Shridas says:

            ” there as reason that people in India suggested that romantic or other relationships that lead to long term commitments should be begun after one has worked towards a career (or established a sense of self, during which learning and self-discipline along with learning a skill to survive on your own was important.) ”

            I would initially agree with this, in another era. In today’s world, by the time one finishes higher education, job search (can take years to land a good job unfortunately), finally getting hired and establishing oneself, many men and women are almost 30 years old, or even in their 30s!

            As far as short term relationships, I don’t see anything wrong with them. Most students aren’t ready for marriage but simply want to date in their college years. If some of those daters fall in love and later marry, congratulations to them. Every dating relationship doesn’t have to end in marriage, why should it?

            “Love, by its very definition is strong. And it is not necessary that it come in a ‘romantic’ way.”
            Romance and sexual attraction will have to come at some point, even in old style arranged marriage where the couple meet on the day of shaadi itself. If this type of attraction does not grow between them, or grows only for one and not the other, the marriage will be miserable and not worth calling a “marriage”.

          • guest says:

            Look, what you are doing is trying to assert that you are in the right….and I am incorporating what you are saying and yet telling you only one thing…..’it is not as rosy as it is made out to be’. Are you sure that in romantic relationships attraction is both sided?? that is delusion….Arranged marriages today are not what they were supposed to be….there was much research and use of astrology, which I know many do not believe in, but it looked towards long term adjustments. That might have been one of the reasons for the success of marriage. Also a better understanding that relationships needs adjustment and sacrifice–from both partners. But often it is one more than other, sometimes man, sometimes woman. Are you suggesting that romantic relationships have ‘love and attraction’ equal on both ends? I have seen romantic relationships just as ‘practical’ as arranged marriage, and without the support of large extended family–especially in the west (extended family has its own place in understanding between the couple–they get to see relationships up close and personal)—So, one final time, understand this…..marriage works–in many cases because we have made a decision. as far as a attraction is concerned, it can happen with another even after marriage and what do you then? say you want to be married to two or divorce? No end to the focus on attraction. There has to be a concept of ‘sacred’ something that is sacred to you. That is why, in India marriages were sacred, men and women did not even take each other’s names, almost like a deity. The concept behind so many ceremonies in Indian marriages was to slowly allow them to be a couple. Does not mean that marriages did not break up. In the end, both can work fine, but the way romantic works today where nothing is sacred and commitment is not paramount and short term dating is the thing…well, that is something that undermines the idea of love. It is after all –short term, no love there, it is only to hide the fact that it is hard to be alone and so, let us spend time with others…till it lasts…are you sure that one partner cannot feel used?

          • guest says:

            Also today most arranged marriages consider attraction as one major goal (as it should be) and forget many other things that arranged marriages considered earlier. So the focus on personal attraction is very narrow. The concept of marriage is not just for two people, it is a basic unit, which needs to be a part of a larger context. IN the west, when that context is missing, there is no purpose to the love relationship. Focus on children in Indian marriages was because of two things. 1. of course we need people to continue a civilisation. 2. people understood children bring newness and play back in the lives of the adults. Too much focus only on romantic love –WHICH HAPPENS EVEN WITHIN ARRANGED MARRIAGE—takes away from the focus on purpose of marriage.

          • Shridas says:

            Focus on children is ok to a point. I don’t think we need to get into India’s current population numbers. Many couples want to be together but don’t want children. I know some who were pressured into having children by their families, in-laws, society, etc. I don’t have to explain this, we all know how people can be. Well, they had kids and are not happy, nor are they great parents. Would have been better off moving away from all the nosy busy bodies and living life as a couple on their own.
            The days of marriage being largely for the propagation of the species and culture are numbered.
            There are many options for coupling these days, and more are coming. Let’s wish everyone well.

          • guest says:

            Know one thing, children are always going to be needed, every generation. As for having children under pressure, well, its not the society as much as people who cannot stand up for themselves. Children bring joy into people’s lives. Not being good parents, well, there are many reasons….for one—parenting is learnt from our own parents. and parenting in modern world has been reduced to being between two people. It is supposed to be a large community endeavour. These issues are intertwined with many other issues. Your comments do not emerge from wisdom or having understood various aspects of life. when you say, ‘The days of marriage being largely for the propagation of the species and culture are numbered.’ meaning what? we will always need children, because they are the ones who grow up into adults. If we will always need children then marriage is the only way to give them a a healthy space to grow up. The main purpose of marriage was supporting a community, for in the long run the community provided a safe space. Wishing everyone well is absolutely fine. The ways of coupling without understanding their long term consequences is something we need to be wary of. And again, ‘happiness as a pursuit’¨as recommended by the west, is problematic. Happiness is not a goal, its a journey, and it happens when we are engaged in activates that have a positive impact on those around us, directly or indirectly. Marriage then is a small bit in creating and continuing community.

          • Shridas says:

            Yes children bring joy and every child deserves a joyous life. There are so many orphans in our India. Indian couples should adopt these children. Actually shame on those that don’t. In my own family I’ve managed to convince 2 couples so far to adopt. My cousin and her husband decided not have children but to adopt 3, so far they have adopted 2 and are waiting for their third. My uncle and his wife have adopted one and had one. I don’t know how we live with ourselves knowing there are so many orphans in our country who need families and yet they keep on breeding to the tune of over a billion. Shameless.

          • guest says:

            Again, some good points, but without complete understanding. It sounds nice, and noble as it is…to adopt children. Adopting is not new. Yet, very few do it. Human nature. Can that change? Sure, but not much. Krishna himself is one of the best examples of ‘adoption’ of a kind. You continue to say, ‘Shameless’ as if your own ideas is the way world should work. Does that mean who want their own children are not good people? Some can rise about the instinct to have a biological child. Others cannot. Simple. and yet, you digress. Marriage is still required to take care of children. So long as people are living together to have social and emotional benefits, it is marriage, whether we call it or not. And please stop imposing your idea of morality on everyone (I did it once, but now understand that the real freedom lies in allowing people their way towards life, unless they are willingly hurting someone or themselves.)

          • Shridas says:

            I know several singles who’ve adopted so no, marriage is not required for children. I’m not a believer in moral relativism. There are higher morals, and adopting children who need families is a superior moral than breeding in a country of over a billion. A policy should be built around this. At the very least some sort of cultural encouragement. People can improve themselves and their morals through encouragement, through teaching, through culture and through examples of others. We don’t need to remain ignorant and immoral or amoral our whole lives.

          • guest says:

            Agree about moral relativism, but you know that world over people spend millions in trying to have their own children. So may be a bit of wisdom in understanding human nature and the need for an ‘offspring’ will help. As for being morally superior value, well, most people (exceptions exist) adopt when they cannot have their own (most I said, which points to a norm)—again testifying for a deep human desire for their offspring.

            Can morals be changed and improved? surely, biological natures are hard to change. If you change them for some and for a short time, usually they return.

            As for singles adopting children….some can, for the most it becomes a hard thing for taking care of children is not easy. Do not go thinking of celebrities, they have plenty of dough to support their choices. And they get enough support. Raising children, can never be reduced to one or two people. Can people do it? surely, not desirable not recommended. Not just in India, the world over.

    • HARRY says:

      What is your beef with anything Indian, you always seem to criticize everything that is indian ? I don’t seem to understand you or your logic.

      • Shridas says:

        What? Quote me where I criticized even one thing Indian, forget everything.

        • HARRY says:

          You seem to appreciate more western models of everything, you think it’s good as a slice bread, and everyone knows how good slice bread is for you.

          If you don’t like anything, don’t follow it, be it western or eastern , from your comments you seem to show resentment and contempt towards any solution or write up from either the writer of the article or the other comments and it can be seen from your comments reply .

          Why hate one’s own culture solutions, there’s time like you are one of those individuals who punches his own wife and then complains about the marks that appears afterwards. Why?

          You are giving this kind of signals from your comments . This is why I had to write this.

          You have your own solution, if you don’t like anything , just walk away, it’s simple as this.

Leave a comment